Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion

2020 Edition
| Editors: David A. Leeming

Paranormal Experience

  • Nicholas Grant BoevingEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24348-7_492

Although the word itself did not come into common usage until at least 1920 (from the Latin para: counter, against), the cluster of phenomena generally agreed upon as being “paranormal” has appeared in every culture, age, and era of which we have written record. As is the case in every historical excavation, one must take note of the fact that the taxonomies used are indeed our own and, in the particular case of this category, entirely new. What we in the modern age consider outside or next to the limen of experience, other cultures included with the mysteries of the circulation of the blood and the wind, harsh demarcations being the province of the modern age. Generally speaking, however, the paranormal is an umbrella term used to describe unusual experiences or events that resist scientific explanation. The term is frequently found in conjunction with parapsychology, the scientific field dedicated to the gathering and analysis of paranormal data, under which the following are...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Alleau, R. (1960). History of occult sciences (The new illustrated history of science and invention). London: Leisure Arts Limited Publishers (No date appears, but probably1960s).Google Scholar
  2. Cohen, D. (1971). A natural history of unnatural things. New York: McCall.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, D. (1979). Ceremonial magic. Cincinnati: Four Winds Press.Google Scholar
  4. Condon, E. U. (1969). Scientific study of unidentified flying objects (Report commissioned by the U. S. Air Force. Introduction by W. Sullivan). New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  5. Fort, C. (1919). The book of the damned. New York: Boni and Liveright.Google Scholar
  6. Fort, C. (1923). New lands. New York: Boni and Liveright.Google Scholar
  7. Fort, C. (1931). Lo! New York: Claude Kendall.Google Scholar
  8. Fort, C. (1932). Wild talents. New York: Charles Fort.Google Scholar
  9. Kreskin. (1974). The amazing world of Kreskin. (c. 1973 by Kreskin). New York: Avon.Google Scholar
  10. Krupp, E. C. (Ed.). (1978). In search of ancient astronomies. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  11. Kusche, L. D. (1975). The Bermuda Triangle mystery-solved. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  12. Larue, G. A. (1975). Ancient myth and modern men. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Lewinsohn, R. (1961). Science, prophecy and prediction. New York: Bell.Google Scholar
  14. Ley, W. (1969). Another look at Atlantis, and fifteen other essays. New York: Bell.Google Scholar
  15. MacDougall, C. D. (1958). Hoaxes. (c. 1940 by C. D. MacDougall). Mitchell: Dover. Hoaxes in Art, History, Science, Literature, Politics and Journalism. (A6253.M3).Google Scholar
  16. MacDougall, C. D. (1983). Superstition and the press. Bufallo: Prometheus.Google Scholar
  17. Mackay, C. (1892). Memoirs of extraordinary popular delusions and the madness of crowds. London: George Routledge & Sons.Google Scholar
  18. McCain, G., & Segal, E. M. (1994). The game of science (5th ed.). Pacific Grove: Brooks-Cole.Google Scholar
  19. McIntosh, C. (1969). The astrologers and their creed, an historical outline. London: Praeger.Google Scholar
  20. Neher, A. (1980). The psychology of transcendence. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Randi, J. (1975). The magic of Uri Geller, as revealed by the amazing Randi. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
  22. Randi, J. (1986). The faith healers. Seattle: Prometheus.Google Scholar
  23. Shirley, R. (1972). Occultists & mystics of all ages. Buffallo: University Books.Google Scholar
  24. Stiebing, W. H., Jr. (1984). Ancient astronauts, cosmic collisions, and other popular theories about man’s past. Buffallo: Prometheus.Google Scholar
  25. Tompkins, P. (1973). The secret life of plants. Kent: Avon.Google Scholar
  26. West, J. A., & Toonder, J. G. (1970). The case for astrology. London: MacDonald.Google Scholar
  27. Zölner, J. C. F. (1888). Transcendental physics. In An account of experimental investigations from the scientific treatises of Johann Carl Friederich Zölner. Boston: Colby & Rich.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rice UniversityHoustonUSA