Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion

2020 Edition
| Editors: David A. Leeming

Love

  • David C. BalderstonEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24348-7_394
  • 3 Downloads

Love is a powerful force that connects and energizes people. It has long been a theme of religions and literatures around the world. More recently, love has been studied by social scientists. This article surveys the major meanings of love, as used in various religions and in modern psychological thought.

Introduction

Love means several different things. Other languages have two, three, or more words with different meanings, where English has only one, to use in many different situations. The authoritative Oxford English Dictionary describes over 30 uses of “love.” Like many writers, Scots poet Robert Burns (1759–1796) used literary devices to heighten the effects of his thoughts, e.g., “O, my luv’s like a red, red rose” – here, a simile to dramatize love’s power of attraction. In contrast, a modern definition strives for neutral objectivity: “Love is the creating and/or sustaining of the connections of mutual support in ever-widening ranges of significance” (Carothers 1968)....

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Blum, D. (2002). Love at God park: Harry Harlow and the science of affection. Cambridge: Perseus.Google Scholar
  2. Buber, M. (2000). I and thou (trans: Smith, R. G.). New York: Scribners. (Original work published 1923)Google Scholar
  3. Carothers, J. E. (1968). The pusher and puller: A concept of God. Nashville: Abingdon.Google Scholar
  4. Cassidy, J., & Shaver, P. R. (Eds.). (1999). Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  5. Chess, S., & Thomas, A. (1984). Origins and development of behavior disorders. New York: Bruner/Mazel.Google Scholar
  6. Erikson, E. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  7. Hunt, M. (1959). The natural history of love. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  8. Maslow, A. (1987). Motivation and personality (3rd ed.). New York: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  9. Niebuhr, R. (1937). Beyond tragedy. New York: Scribners.Google Scholar
  10. Rogers, C. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  11. Shakespeare, W. (1609/1974). Cymbeline. In G. B. Evans (Ed.), The Riverside Shakespeare. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. [Originally written ca. 1609–1610 and first published in the “First Folio” of Heminge, J., & Condell, H. (Eds.). (1623). Mr. William Shakespeares comedies, histories, & tragedies. London: Isaac Iaggard & Ed. Blount, printers].Google Scholar
  12. Simpson, J. A., & Weiner E. S. C. (Eds.). (1989). The Oxford English dictionary (2nd ed., 20 Vols.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Sternberg, R., & Weis, K. (Eds.). (2006). The new psychology of love. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Tillich, P. (1954). Love, power, and justice. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Toman, W. (1976). Family constellation (3rd ed.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Weinberg, G. (1981). The pliant animal: Understanding the greatest human asset. New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.New YorkUSA