Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion

2020 Edition
| Editors: David A. Leeming

Incarnation

  • Charlene P. E. BurnsEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24348-7_327
  • 2 Downloads

Literally, the act of being “made flesh”; the earliest and most common usage is in reference to the Christian doctrine about the divine nature of Jesus.

Historical Overview

Belief that the divine manifests in human form is as old and diverse as religion itself. Cave art from the late Paleolithic Age depicts masked figures thought to represent the divine animal spirit; sacred heavenly visitors are portrayed in the art of premodern societies. Many Native American religions teach that souls of the dead return to earth in human or animal form and also that the divine incarnates itself from time to time. Some Australian indigenous peoples teach that the human has two souls: one mortal and the other immortal and believed to be a particle of the totemic ancestral beginnings.

Ancient Greek Gnostics believed that the human being is a duality of material body and immortal soul. The souls turned away from contemplation of the One and fell from the divine realm to be incarnated and imprisoned in...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Burns, C. P. E. (2001). Divine becoming: Rethinking Jesus and incarnation. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  2. Dourley, J. P. (2001). Revisioning incarnation: Jung on the relativity of God. Shim-Song Yon-Gu: Journal of the Korean Jung Institute, 16(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  3. Forster, S. E., & Carveth, D. L. (1999). Christianity: A Kleinian perspective. Canadian Journal of Psychoanalysis, 7(2), 187–218.Google Scholar
  4. Freud, S. (1913, 1953). Totem and taboo: Some points of agreement between the mental lives of savages and neurotics (SE, Vol. 13, pp. 1–161).Google Scholar
  5. Freud, S. (1927). The future of an illusion. In J. Strachey (Ed.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 21, pp. 1–56). London: Hogarth Press, 1961.Google Scholar
  6. Freud, S. (1947). Moses and monotheism (trans: Jones, K.). New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  7. Gard, R. A. (1963). Buddhism, great religions of modern man. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
  8. Heimbrock, H. (1977). Phantasie und christlicher Glaube: Zum Dialog zwischen Theologie und der Psychoanalyse. Grunewald: Kaiser.Google Scholar
  9. Jung, C. G. (1938/1966). Psychology & religion: The Terry lectures. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Jung, C. G. (1948). A psychological approach to the Trinity. In H. Read, M. Fordham, G. Adler & W. McGuire (Eds.), The collected works (2nd ed., Vol. 11, pp. 107–200, trans: Hull, R.F.C.). Bollingen Series. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
  11. Jung, C. G. (1976). Answer to job. In J. Campbell (Ed.), The portable Jung (pp. 519–650). New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  12. Martin, R. C. (1982). Islamic studies: A history of religions approach (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Moltmann, J. (1973). The crucified God: The cross of Christ as the foundation and criticism of Christian theology (trans: Wilson, R. A. & Bowden, J.). New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  14. Neusner, J. (1988). The incarnation of God: The character of God in formative Judaism. Philadelphia: Fortress Press.Google Scholar
  15. Parrinder, G. (1982). Avatar and incarnation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Rizzuto, A. M. (1979). The birth of the living God: A psychoanalytic study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Stoler Miller, B. (trans.) (1986). The Bhagavad Gita. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  18. Waida, M. (1987). Incarnation. In M. Eliade (Ed.), The encyclopedia of religion (Vol. 7, pp. 156–161). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Wyschograd, M. (1996). A Jewish perspective on incarnation. Modern Theology, 12(April), 195–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and Religious StudiesUniversity of Wisconsin-Eau ClaireEau ClaireUSA