Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion

2020 Edition
| Editors: David A. Leeming

Fundamentalism

  • Louis HoffmanEmail author
  • Erica Palmer
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24348-7_254

The term fundamentalism has been associated with a variety of meanings since its inception into the English language during the early twentieth century through Christianity. At the outset, it was intended to convey a belief in the need to return to the fundamentals of faith (González 1985). Increasingly, fundamentalism has been associated with a narrow, rigid approach to religious belief across various world religions. It is also commonly associated with conservative religious, and sometimes political, beliefs. Fundamentalism, which originated as a term within Christianity, is now often applied to Islamic, Buddhist, Jewish, Hindu, and other religious groups. When used in popular culture today, fundamentalism often is intended to have a pejorative connotation to it. When considering fundamentalism, it is important to recognize how its meaning in popular, religious, and scholarly literature has evolved overtime.

Origins of Fundamentalism

The term fundamentalism emerged in the 1800s as a...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Carlucci, L., Tommasi, M., Balsamo, M., Furnham, A., & Saggino, A. (2015). Religious fundamentalism and psychological well-being: An Italian study. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 43, 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Friedman, M. (2008). Religious fundamentalism and responses to mortality salience: A quantitative text analysis. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 18(3), 216–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. González, J. L. (1985). The story of Christianity, The reformation to the present (Vol. 2). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  4. Hill, P. C., & Hood, R. W., Jr. (Eds.). (1999). Measures of religiosity. Birmingham: Religious Education Press.Google Scholar
  5. Hoffman, L., & Kurzenberger, M. (2008). Premodern, modern, and postmodern interpretations of the miraculous and mental illness from religious and psychological perspectives. In J. H. Ellens (Ed.), Miracles: God, science, and psychology in the paranormal (Vol. 3). Westport: Praeger Books.Google Scholar
  6. Hood, R. W., Jr., Hill, P. C., & Williamson, W. P. (2005). The psychology of religious fundamentalism. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  7. Noll, M. A. (1992). A history of Christianity in the United States and Canada. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
  8. Phillips, R. E., III, & Ano, G. G. (2015). A re-examination of religious fundamentalism: Positive implications for coping. Mental Health, Religion, and Culture, 18, 299–311.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2015.1022521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Rogers, M. B., Loewenthal, K. M., Lewis, C. A., Amlot, R., Cinnirella, M., & Ansari, H. (2007). The role of religious fundamentalism in terrorist violence: A social psychological analysis. International Review of Psychiatry, 19(3), 253–262.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Spilka, B., Hood, R. W., Jr., Hunsberger, B., & Gorsuch, R. (2003). The psychology of religion: An empirical approach. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  11. Strobel, L. (1998). The case for Christ: A journalists personal investigation of the evidence for Jesus. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Saybrook UniversityOaklandUSA
  2. 2.AspenPointeColorado SpringsUSA