Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion

2020 Edition
| Editors: David A. Leeming

Extrasensory Perception (ESP)

  • C. Harry HuiEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24348-7_214
  • 4 Downloads

Extrasensory perception refers to the alleged processes of precognition, telepathy, and clairvoyance that take place via channels other than the sensory system that biologists and psychologists have been researching with scientific means. Precognition is the knowledge of future events obtained not through logical reasoning but through dreams or other psychical awareness. Telepathy is the sending and receiving of message over a distance, through nonphysical means. Clairvoyance is the perception of an object that is out of normal sight. Some records exist of people who have such experience of anomalous information transfer. Goulding and Parker (2001) claim that 25–45% of the western population may report some form of ESP or other paranormal experiences.

Some clinical psychologists regard such experiences as delusion and therefore associate them with mental disorder, while the more new-age-oriented psychologists do not agree with this correlation (Targ et al. 2000). Besides the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Bem, D. J., & Honorton, C. (1994). Does psi exist? Replicable evidence for an anomalous process of information transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 4–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, A. S. (2004). The déjà vu experience. New York: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cardeña, E., Lynn, S. J., & Krippner, S. (Eds.). (2000). Varieties of anomalous experience: Examining the scientific evidence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  4. Goulding, A., & Parker, A. (2001). Finding psi in the paranormal: Psychometric measures used in research on paranormal beliefs/experiences and in research on psi-ability. European Journal of Parapsychology, 16, 73–101.Google Scholar
  5. Milton, J., & Wiseman, R. (1999). Does psi exist? Lack of replication of an anomalous process of information transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 387–391.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Myers, D. G. (2006). Psychology (8th ed.). New York: Worth.Google Scholar
  7. Targ, E., Schlitz, M., & Irwin, H. J. (2000). Psi-related experiences. In E. Cardeña, S. J. Lynn, & S. Krippner (Eds.), Varieties of anomalous experience: Examining the scientific evidence (pp. 219–252). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Tobacyk, J. J., & Milford, G. (1983). Belief in paranormal phenomena: Assessment instrument development and implications for personality functioning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1029–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of ChinaHong KongPeople’s Republic of China