Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion

2020 Edition
| Editors: David A. Leeming

James, William, and the Phenomenology of Religious Experience

  • M. Laurel-Leigh Meierdiercks
  • John R. SnareyEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24348-7_200207

James, Brentano, and Husserl

William James is widely known as the father of American psychology and a leading American philosopher. Religious studies scholars also know him as a founding father of their field. Surprisingly, however, James’s vital contributions to the development of phenomenology, in general, and the phenomenology of religious experience, in particular, are virtually unknown or overlooked. Nevertheless, historically, James influenced phenomenologists Franz Brentano and Carl Stumpf and, in turn, Edmund Husserl himself.

Edmund Husserl was a German phenomenologist who worked in the early twentieth century. He is typically credited with founding the contemporary phenomenological tradition. Scholarship on the topic has shown that Husserl’s development of the phenomenological method was inspired by his teacher, Franz Brentano, as well the work of William James. Although the term “phenomenology” had already appeared in German philosophy in the works of Johann Heinrich Lambert...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Blum, J. N. (2015). William James on how to study experience: Integrating phenomenology of religion and radical empiricism. Method and Theory in the Study of Religion, 27, 423–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brentano, F. C. (1867–1917) Correspondence (MS Ger 202). Houghton Library, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  3. Bridgers, L., & Snarey, J. (2003). From father to son: Generative care and gradual conversion in William James’s writing of The Varieties. Journal of Moral Education, 32(4), 329–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Drabinski, J. E. (1993). Radical empiricism and phenomenology: Philosophy and the pure stuff of experience. The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, 7(3), 226–242.Google Scholar
  5. Duncan, F. D. (1974). The contribution of William James to the psychology of religion. The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary.Google Scholar
  6. Edie, J. M. (1987). William James and phenomenology (1st ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Husserl, E. (1983). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: First book: General introduction to a pure phenomenology. (trans: Kersten, F). The Hague/Boston/Hingham: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Husserl, E. (2007). Wahrnehmung und Aufmerksamkeit: Texte aus dem Nachlass (pp. 1893–1912). New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  9. James, W. (1902/2002). The varieties of religious experience. Amherst: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
  10. Meierdiercks, M. L.-L., & Snarey, J. (2016). James and Husserl: The early development of phenomenology of religious experience. Presented at the Circle in Phenomenology of Religious Experience, Berkeley, Graduate Theological Union.Google Scholar
  11. Rollinger, R. D. (2009). Austrian phenomenology: Brentano, Husserl, Meinong, and others on mind and object. Frankfurt/Piscataway: Ontos Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. Spiegelberg, H. (1971). The phenomenological movement: A historical introduction (2nd ed). The Hague: Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Laurel-Leigh Meierdiercks
    • 1
  • John R. Snarey
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.University of South Florida, PhilosophyTampaUSA
  2. 2.School of Theology and Department of PsychologyEmory UniversityAtlantaUSA