Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion

2020 Edition
| Editors: David A. Leeming

Optics (Latin)

  • Dan MillsEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24348-7_200148

Beginning with Plato’s Timaeus, philosophical treatises on optics from the ancienty world through the late middle ages and early modern period addressed optics through a religious and spiritual perspective. Many medieval philosophers on optics, including Abu Yusuf Ya‘qub ibn Ishaq Al-Kindi, Hasan ibn al-Haytham (Latinized as Alhazen or Alhacen), Roger Bacon, Witelo, and Robert Grosseteste were theologians as well as natural philosophers, and their discussions of optics all have varying degrees of religious implications. Al-Kindi and Alhazen established the foundation upon which optical theory in the medieval Latin West would base optical theory through translations of the ancient sources into Latin as well as Latin versions of their Arabic sources.

Latin sources on optics had their beginning with the Latin translation of and commentary on Plato’s Timaeus by Chalcidius. Other important sources include Latin translations of Euclid, Ptolemy, and Aristotle’s psychological texts, De anima, D...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Darrigol, O. (2012). A history of optics from Greek antiquity to the nineteenth century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Denery, D. G., II. (2005). Seeing and being seen in the later medieval world: Optics, theology and religious life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Lacan, J. (2006a). Presentation on psychical causality. In B. Fink (Trans.), Écrits: The first complete edition in English (pp. 123–158). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  4. Lacan, J. (2006b). The mirror stage as formative of the function of the I as revealed in psychoanalytic experience. In B. Fink (Trans.), Écrits: The first complete edition in English (pp. 75–81). New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  5. Lindberg, D. C. (1976). Theories of vision from al-Kindi to Kepler. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  6. Smith, A. M. (1998). The physiological and psychological grounds of Ptolemy’s visual theory: Some methodological considerations. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 34(3), 231–246.Google Scholar
  7. Smith, A. M. (2004). What is the history of medieval optics really about? Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 148(2), 180–194.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Smith, A. M. (2006). Introduction. In Alhacen on the principles of reflection: A critical edition, with English translation and commentary, of books 4 and 5 of Alhacen’s “De aspectibus” (pp. xv–cxxvii). Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Athens Technical CollegeAthensUSA