Skip to main content

Imagination

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion
  • 16 Accesses

Introduction

Imagination always infers perception (Aristotle, Book II). Aristotle’s opening quote points to one view for imagination, and it is from perception and its mechanics that this investigation into the state of imagination commences hoping to become less imaginary about perception.

Historical Views

Greek philosophers perceived imagination, or phantasia, as a filter that directly affected/changed perception (Caston 1996). This suspicion/mistrust of imagination has historically led Western philosophers to construe it as: “…something different from the mind” (Cohoe 1996/2016, p. 321). The nature of this something different was written about by both Aristotle and Plato as, “causally derives from sensation, and its character derives from the character of that sensation” (Ibid, p. 328). Linking imagination to perception, sensation, and character reflects on how early Greek philosophers framed human psychology and imagination’s influence on human nature. Scheiter (2012) notes that...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Boff, L. (1979). Liberating grace. New York: Orbis Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, J. D. (1998). Seeing ino the life of things. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caston, V. (1996). Phronesis, 41(1), 230–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohoe, C. (1996/2016). Phronesis, 61(3), 337–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ error. New York: Grosser/Putman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmundson, M. (2012). Imagination: powers and perils. Raritan, 32(2), 144–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flory, D. (1996). Philosophy and Rhetoric, 29(2), 147–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, H. (1995). On the nature of consciousness: cognitive, phenomenological and transpersonal perspectives. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kast, V. (2014). Analytical Psychology, 59(5), 680–694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, R. (1988/2002). The Wake of Imagination. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, G. (1989). Imaging god, theology, and religious imagination. Cambridge, MA: Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, W. (1973). Images of faith: An exploration pf iconic influences. London: Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, J. (1987). Faith, theology, and imagination. Edingurgh: Handsel Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouspensky, P.D. (1957). The Fourth Way. N.Y.: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. M. (2000). The critical edition of Q. Augsburg Fortress Publishers, Project Muse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre’, J. P. (1940). The imaginary (trans: Webber, J.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheiter, L. (2012). Phronesis, 57(1), 251–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, N. (2003). http://cgu.edu/htm/bradshaw.htm.

  • Watson, E. (1975). Biogrphia Literaria. London: Dent.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Haldeman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Haldeman, D. (2020). Imagination. In: Leeming, D.A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24348-7_200068

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics