Advertisement

Evolution of Space Traffic and Space Traffic Management

Living reference work entry
  • 192 Downloads

Abstract

In 2016, the notion that the local space environment would continue to evolve at rates defined by previous satellite launch histories changed dramatically when SpaceX requested permission to place over 4400 satellites in low Earth orbits. Prior to that time, predictions were that the space environment could be stabilized by space operators abiding by rules and guidelines designed to limit the growth of debris. While all proposed satellites might not be realized, major changes in the near-space environment are coming and may come quickly. This chapter provides background, discusses potential changes, and highlights new polices and services that could arise.

References

  1. Ailor W (2019) Hazards of reentry disposal of satellites from large constellations. J Space Safe Eng 6:113–121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ailor W, Womack J, Peterson G, Lao N (2010) Effects of space debris on the cost of space operations. In: IAC-10.A6.2.10, 61st International astronautical congress. Czech Republic, Prague, 27 Sept–1 Oct 2010Google Scholar
  3. Ailor WH, Hallman WP, Steckel GL, Weaver MA (2011) Test cases for reentry survivability modeling. In: 5th IAASS conference, Versailles, 17–19 Oct 2011Google Scholar
  4. Ailor W, Peterson GE, Womack J, Youngs M (2017) Effect of large constellations on lifetime of satellites in low earth orbits. J Space Safe Eng 4:117–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feistel AS, Weaver MW, Ailor WH (2013) Comparison of reentry breakup measurements for three atmospheric reentries In: 6th International association for the advancement of space safety conference, Montreal, May 2013Google Scholar
  6. ISO 24113 (2019) Space Systems - Space debris mitigation requirements. Reproduced with permission of International Organization for Standardization, ISO. Standard available from any ISO member or see http://www.iso.org. Copyright remains with ISO
  7. Oltrogge DL et al (2018) A comprehensive assessment of collision likelihood in geosynchronous earth orbit. Acta Astronaut 147:316–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Peterson GE, Jenkin AB, Sorge ME, McVey JP (2018) Tracking requirements for space traffic management in the presence of proposed small satellite constellations. In: IAC-18,A6,7,6,x43991, 69th international astronautical conference, Bremen, 1–5 Oct 2018Google Scholar
  9. Position Paper (2017) A grand challenge for active removal of space debris In: International association for the advancement of space safety, IAASS-PP-00117-WA, 17 May 2017. See http://iaass.space-safety.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/24/2018/03/Orig.-Position-Paper-on-ADR-v6-1.pdf

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Orbital and Reentry Debris StudiesThe Aerospace CorporationEl SegundoUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Peter L. Hays
    • 1
  1. 1.Space Policy InstituteGeorge Washington UniversityWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations