Skip to main content

Resilience of Space Systems: Principles and Practice

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Abstract

In view of the increasing complexity of the space environment, resilience has emerged as a pervasive concept in contemporary space security. This chapter provides an overview on the principles and practice of resilience of space systems and operations. It frames the emerging field from two distinct but complementary approaches: mission assurance and deterrence and high reliability and resilience engineering. Drawing on contemporary thinking from civilian and military perspectives, the chapter posits resilience as a distinct yet malleable notion at the intersection of space security and safety and highlights specific areas meriting further engagement for policy makers, systems analysts, and operators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • A New Space Strategy for Canada (2019) Ministry of Innovation, Science and Economic Development, Alberta

    Google Scholar 

  • Aerospace (2018) Resilience for space systems: concepts, tools and approaches (ATR-2017-02226). Aerospace Corporation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Air Force Space Command (2016) Resiliency and disaggregated space architectures: a white paper. US Air Force, Colorado Springs

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold DC, Hays PL (2013) Strategy and the security space enterprise. In: Sadeh E (ed) (2012) Space strategy in the 21st century: theory and policy. Routledge, London, pp 120–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendiek A (2017) A paradigm shift in the EU’s common foreign and security policy: from transformation to resilience. German Institute for International and Security Affairs, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • BMVg (2016) Weissbuch zur Sicherheitspolitik und Zukunft der Bundeswehr. German Federal Ministry of Defence, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Defense Science Board (2017) Task Force on Defense Strategies for Ensuring the Resilience of National Space Capabilities, March 2017, Office of the Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology and Logistics, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker S (2005) Ten questions about human error: a new view of human factors and system safety. CRC Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker S (2012) Just culture: balancing safety and accountability, 2nd edn. Ashgate, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • DOD (2011) Fact sheet: resilience of space capabilities. US Department of Defense, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • DOD (2012) Directive 3100.10: space policy (update 2016). US Department of Defense, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • ESPI (2018) Security in outer space: rising stakes in Europe. European Space Policy Institute, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2016) A space strategy for Europe, COM (2016) 705. European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Haavik TK, Antonsen S, Rosness R, Hale A (2016) HRO and RE: a pragmatic perspective. Saf Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haimes YY (2009) On the definition of resilience in systems. Risk Anal 29(4):498–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey MP, Hodgkinson GP (2008) Troubling futures: scenarios and scenario planning for organizational decision making. In: Hodgkinson GP, Starbuck WH (eds) The Oxford handbook of organizational decision making. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 565–585

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E, Woods DD, Leveson NG (2006) Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. Ashgate, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E, Nemeth CP, Dekker S (eds) (2008) Remaining sensitive to the possibility of failure. Resilience engineering perspectives, vol 1. Ashgate, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakhu RS, Pelton JN (2017) Global space governance: an international study. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Freese J (2016) Space warfare in the 21st century: arming the heavens. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leveson NG (2011) Engineering a safer world: systems thinking applied to safety. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick PK (2013) Space debris: conjunction opportunities and opportunities for international cooperation. Sci Public Policy 40(6):801–813

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod G, Nacouzi G, Dreyer P, Eisman M, Hura M, Langeland KS, Manheim D (2016) Enhancing space resilience through non-material means. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministère des Armées (2019) Stratégie Spatiale de Défense: Rapport du groupe de travail ≪ Espace ≫, Ministere des Armees, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • NSSS (2011) National security space strategy: unclassified summary. US Department of Defense and Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • OSD (2015) Space domain mission assurance: a resilience taxonomy. Office of the Assistance Secretary of Defense for Homeland Defense & Global Security, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Pace S (2015) Security in space. Space Policy 33(2):51–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parly F (2018) Intervention de Florence Parly, ministre des Armées: Espace et défense, 7 September 2018, CNES, Toulouse. https://www.defense.gouv.fr/actualites/articles/direct-florence-parly-s-exprime-sur-les-enjeux-de-l-espace-pour-la-defense. Accessed 22 Jan 2018

  • Pawlikowski E, Loverro D, Cristler T (2012) Space: disruptive challenges, new opportunities and new strategies. Strateg Stud Q 6(1):27–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Peldszus R (2015) The Human Element and System Resilience at the European Space Operations Centre, AMCO-TN-0006 and AMCO-TN-00011 (Internal Reports), ESOC, Darmstadt

    Google Scholar 

  • Peldszus R (2018) Foresight methods for multilateral collaboration in space situational awareness (SSA) policy and operations. J Space Saf Eng 5(2):115–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino M, Stang G (2016) Space security for Europe. EUISS report no. 29, July 2016. EU Institute for Security Studies, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow C (2007) The next catastrophe: reducing our vulnerabilities to natural, industrial, and terrorist disasters. Princeton University Press, Princeton/Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Prior T (2017) NATO: pushing the boundaries for resilience. CSS analyses in security policy, CSS report no. 213. Center for Security Studies, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason J (2008) The human contribution: unsafe acts, accidents and heroic recoveries. Ashgate, Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson J, Šmuclerová M, Degl’Innocenti L, Perrichon L, Pražák J (2018) Europe’s preparedness to respond to space hybrid operations. PSSI report July 2018. Prague Security Studies Institute, Prague

    Google Scholar 

  • UK National Space Policy (2015) HM Government, London

    Google Scholar 

  • UK Space Security Policy (2014) HM Government, London

    Google Scholar 

  • US National Space Policy (2010) Office of the President of the United States, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM (2001) Managing the unexpected: assuring high performance in an age of complexity. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Regina Peldszus .

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Peldszus, R. (2019). Resilience of Space Systems: Principles and Practice. In: Handbook of Space Security. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22786-9_87-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22786-9_87-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22786-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22786-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics