AI and Space Safety: Collision Risk Assessment

Living reference work entry


The New Space environment will introduce notorious changes in the space environment during the next decades with the irruption of mega-constellation, the boost of small satellites, and the generalization of low-thrust engines. Current safety strategies and collision avoidance procedures will no longer be capable to deal with the increase on conjunction alerts. Artificial intelligence appears to be the best strategy to cope with this new situation, thanks to its ability to perform faster than physical models and make decisions based on a wider range of parameters than human operators. This results in better performances when more data are available, as the situations will present on the coming years.


  1. Anderson JL, Kurfess FJ, Puig-Suari J (2009) A framework for developing artificial intelligence for autonomous satellite operations. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI-09 workshop on artificial intelligence in space, Pasadena, 17–18 July 2009Google Scholar
  2. Benjamin Bastida V, Flohrer T, Krag, H, Merz K, Lemmens S (2019) CREAM – ESA’s proposal for collision risk estimation and automated mitigation. In: 1st international orbital debris conference, Sugar Land, 9–12 December 2019Google Scholar
  3. Berquand A, Murdaca F, Riccardi A, Soares T, Gerené S, Brauer N, Kumar K (2018) Towards an artificial intelligence based design engineering assistant for the early design of space missions. In: 68th international astronautical conference, Bremen, 2018Google Scholar
  4. Crosier C (2016) United States Strategic Command space situational awareness sharing program update. United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, Scientific and Technical Subcommittee, 54th session, Vienna, 3 February 2016Google Scholar
  5. ESA Space Debris Office (2019) ESA’s annual environment report. Technical report, ESA.
  6. Furfaro R, Linares R, Reddy V (2019) Space objects classification and characterization via deep learning and light curves: applications to space traffic management. In: Space traffic management conference, Austin, 26 February 2019Google Scholar
  7. Haimerl J, Fonder G (2015) Space fence system overview. In: Advanced Maui optical and space surveillance technologies conference proceedings, Maui, Hawai, September 2015Google Scholar
  8. Izzo D, Märtens M, Pan B. (2019) A survey on artificial intelligence trends in spacecraft guidance dynamics and control. Astrodyn 3, 287–299 (2019). Scholar
  9. Jasiobedski P, Greenspan M, Roth G (2001) Pose determination and tracking for autonomous satellite capture. In: 6th international symposium on artificial intelligence, robotics and automation in space, Montreal, June 2001Google Scholar
  10. Julian K, Lopez J (2016) Policy compression for aircraft collision avoidance systems. In: IEEE/AIAA 35th digital avionics systems conference (DASC), Sacramento, September 2016Google Scholar
  11. Kochenderfer MJ, Chryssanthacopoulos JP (2011) Robust air-borne collision avoidance through dynamic programming. Lincoln Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Lexington, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  12. Lewis H, Radtke J, Rossi A, Beck J, Oswald M, Anderson P, Bastida Virgili B, Krag H (2017) Sensitivity of the space debris environment to large constellations and small satellites. J Br Interplanet Soc 70:105–117Google Scholar
  13. Mashiku A, Frueh C, Memarsadeghi N (2018) Supervised-machine learning for intelligent collision avoidance decision-making and sensor tasking. 2018 NASA Goddard workshop on artificial intelligence, Greenbelt, Maryland, November 2018Google Scholar
  14. Mashiku A, Frueh C, Memarsadeghi N, Gizzi E, Zielinki M, Burton A (2019) Predicting satellite close approaches in the context of artificial intelligence. In: AAS/AIAA astrodynamics specialist conference, Portland, 11–15 August 2019Google Scholar
  15. Minisci E, Serra R, Vasile M, Riccardi A, Grey S, Lemmens S (2017) Uncertainty treatment in the GOCE re-entry. In: 1st IAA conference on space situational awareness, Orlando, November 2017Google Scholar
  16. Murakami D, Nag S, Lifson M, Kopardekar P (2019) Space traffic management with a NASA UAS traffic management (UTM) inspired architecture. AIAA SciTech Forum, San Diego, 7–11 January 2019.
  17. Nag S, Murakami D, Lifson M, Kopardekar P (2018) System autonomy for space traffic management. In: IEEE/AIAA digital avionics and systems conference, London, September 2018Google Scholar
  18. Peng H, Bai X (2017) Limits of machine learning approach on improving orbit prediction accuracy. In: Advanced Maui optical and space surveillance technologies (AMOS) conference. Maui Economic Development Board, Wailea Marriott, September 2017Google Scholar
  19. Peng H, Bai X (2018a) Improving orbit prediction accuracy through supervised machine learning. Adv Space Res 61(10):2628–2646. Scholar
  20. Peng H, Bai X (2018b) Artificial neural network–based machine learning approach to improve orbit prediction accuracy. J Spacecr Rocket 55:1248–1260. Scholar
  21. Peterson G (2019) Establishing space traffic management standards, guidelines, and best practices. Center for Space Policy and Strategy, The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  22. Peterson G, Sorge M, Ailor W (2018) Space traffic management in the age of new space. Center for Space Policy and Strategy, The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  23. Ramirez-Atencia C, Bello-Orgaz G, R-Moreno MD, Camacho D (2017) Solving complex multi-UAV mission planning problems using multi-objective genetic algorithms. Soft Comput 21(17):4883–4900. Scholar
  24. Russell S, Norvig P (eds) (2009) Artificial intelligence. A modern approach, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall Press, Upper Saddle RiverzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Sanchez L, Vasile M, Minisci E (2019) AI to support decision making in collision risk assessment. Paper presented at the 70th international astronautical conference, Washington, DC, 21–25 October 2019Google Scholar
  26. Sanchez L, Vasile M, Minisci E (2020) On the use of machine learning and evidence theory to improve collision risk management. Paper presented at the 2nd IAA international conference in space situational awareness, Washington, DC, 14–16 January 2020Google Scholar
  27. Shabarekh C, Kent-Bryant J, Keselman G, Mitidis A (2016) A novel method for satellite maneuver prediction. In: Advanced Maui optical and space surveillance technologies conference, Maui, September 2016Google Scholar
  28. Statheros T, Howells G, McDonald-Maier K (2008) Autonomous ship collision avoidance navigation concepts, technologies and techniques. J Navig 61(1):129–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vasile M, Rodriguez-Fernandez V, Serra R, Camacho D, Riccardi A (2017) Artificial intelligence in support to space traffic management. Paper presented at the 68th international astronautical conference, Adelaide, September 2017Google Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of StrathclydeGlasgowUK

Section editors and affiliations

  • Maarten Adriaensen
    • 1
  1. 1.European Space AgencyParisFrance

Personalised recommendations