Advertisement

Cybersecurity Space Operation Center: Countering Cyber Threats in the Space Domain

Living reference work entry
  • 250 Downloads

Abstract

The focus of this article is to describe the rapid changing nature of space systems where the electromagnetic spectrum and cybersecurity aspects coexist, leading to a “change of course” to ensure secure space communications. Space systems must be designed to achieve cyber resilience. Existing vulnerabilities must be mitigated as resulted from a risk management methodology. To avoid compromises of security, a security monitoring mechanism and incident response for space systems have to be implemented. The authors provide an analysis of the functional capabilities and services of a “cybersecurity space operations center.” System monitoring is essential in view of obtaining a cyber situational awareness and decision-making for space missions. Security operation center-related services could be built up in a permanent or in an ad hoc mobile infrastructure. An integrated cyber range capability to test, train, and exercise over modeled and simulated space systems will improve space operators’ skills when confronted with time-critical interventions.

Notes

Disclaimer

This article is a product of the authors. It does not represent the opinions or policies of the European Defence Agency or the European Union and is designed to provide an independent position.

References

  1. Byrne DJ, Morgan D, Tan K, Johnson B, Dorros C (2014) Cyber defense of space-based assets: verifying and validating defensive designs and implementations. Proc Comput Sci 28. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050914001276
  2. Cayirci E, Karapinar H, Ozcakir L (2017) Joint military space operations simulation as a service. In: Proceedings of the 2017 winter simulation conference. IEEE PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Cuntz M, Konovaltsev A, Dreher A, Meurer M (2012) Jamming and spoofing in GPS/GNSS based applications and services – threats and countermeasures. In: Aschenbruck N, Martini P, Meier M, Tölle J (eds) Future security 2012, Communications in computer and information science, vol 318. Springer, Berlin/HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  4. Endsley MR (1995a) Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors: J Hum Factors Ergon Soc 37(1):32–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Endsley MR (1995b) Measurement of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Hum Factors 37(1):65–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Falco G Job one for space force: space asset cyber security; cyber security project, Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. Harvard Kennedy School, July 2018. https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/job-one-space-force-space-asset-cybersecurity
  7. Jones DG, Endsley MR Can real-time probes provide a valid measure of situation awareness. In: Proceedings of the human performance, situation awareness and automation: user-centered design for the new millennium, Savannah, GA (2000)Google Scholar
  8. Liu AM et al (2013) Predicting space telerobotic operator training performance from human spatial ability assessment. Acta Astronaut 92(1):38–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Martin PK, Inspector General Nasa cybersecurity: an examination of the agency’s information security. US House of Representatives, Feb (2012)Google Scholar
  10. Matthews MD et al (2000) Measures of infantry situation awareness for a virtual MOUT environment. In: Proceedings of the human performance, situation awareness and automation: user centred design for the new millennium conferenceGoogle Scholar
  11. McArdle J (2019) Rethinking cyber training for the non-cyber warrior, conference summary and conclusions, Pell center for international relations and public policy. https://pellcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/01/McArdle-Rethinking-Cyber-Training-Final.pdf
  12. Strater LD et al (2001) Measures of platoon leader situation awareness in virtual decision-making exercises. No. SATECH-00-17. TRW INC Fairfax VA Systems and Information Technology GroupGoogle Scholar
  13. United States Defence Intelligence Agency, Challenges to Security in Space, January 2019Google Scholar
  14. United States Department of the Army, FM 3-12 Cyberspace and electronic warfare operations, April 2017Google Scholar
  15. United States, Joint Publication 3–13.1 electronic warfare, 8 February 2012Google Scholar
  16. Zatti S, The protection of space missions: threats and cyber threats; information and systems security. In: 3th international conference, ICISS 2017, Mumbai, India, 16–20 Dec 2017, ProceedingsGoogle Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.European Defence AgencyBrusselsBelgium
  2. 2.RHEA GroupWavreBelgium
  3. 3.Royal Military AcademyBrusselsBelgium

Section editors and affiliations

  • Maarten Adriaensen
    • 1
  1. 1.European Space AgencyParisFrance

Personalised recommendations