Abstract
As human civilizations increasingly explore, utilize, and compete in space, the man-made security challenges are evolving and the strategies and political economic rationales become increasingly relevant for analysis. Sustainability and efficiency call for exploitation of static economies of scale and scope in space industries and services, yet the trade-offs in control, governance, and dynamic innovation point towards autonomy and oligopolistic structures with overcapacity. The economic sustainability becomes a key element of the dynamic pursue of space policies and objectives at national and partnership levels. In the latter case, specialization and its implications for the wide economy through externalities and indirect effects receive increasing attention as space becomes contested, congested, and competitive. Notwithstanding the fact that they are largely government controlled, aerospace industries play a crucial role in trading patterns. Hence, they can be considered a fiscal government spending element similar to defense expenditure. The country specializations and their evolution in commercial markets and alliances are focal points in the current global trade policy paradigm shifts, affecting performance and evolution of space programs and industries. The analysis concludes with the ever-increasing role of regulation and relative power balances across nations, companies, and terrestrial-air-space systems especially for telecommunication applications.
References
Butler A (2015) USAF operationally responsive space office could oversee next SSA, Weather Sats. Aviation Week, February 12. http://aviationweek.com/space/usaf-operationally-responsive-space-office-could-oversee-next-ssa-weather-sats
Commission (2001) Report of the Commission to Assess Unites States National Security Space Management and Organization. Commission to Assess United States National Security Space Management and Organization, Washington, DC
DoD (2018) Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America. Unpublished, Department of Defense, US
Graziola G, Cefis E, Gritti P (2011) LÍndustria Spaziale Italiana nel Contesto Europeo. IL Muliko, Bologna
Harford J (1997) Korolev: how one man masterminded the soviet drive to beat America to the moon. Wiley, New York
Henry (2019) ITU wants megaconstellations to meet tougher launch milestones. Spacenews. https://spacenews.com/itu-wants-megaconstellations-to-meet-tougher-launch-milestones/?fbclid=IwAR0VpMhgrwveNmii_mNkC2a8inzFnG9Lhc_aspFLgAG_RoPcD4W6AsC5pII. Accessed July 2019
Hertzfeld HR (2002) Technology transfer in the space sector: an international perspective. J Technol Transf 27(4):307–309
HoC (2017) Space sector report. House of Commons Committee on Exiting the European Union, London
ITU (2015) Improving the dissemination of knowledge concerning the applicable regulatory procedures for small satellites, including nanosatellites and picosatellites, Resolution ITU-R 68. ITU, Geneva
ITU (2016) Workplan timeline process and deliverables for the future development of IMT. Unpublished Document, International Telecommunications Union, IMT-ADV/2 Working Group TECH, Meeting 24 June, ITU, Geneva
OECD (2019) The space economy in figures: how space contributes to the global economy. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/c5996201-en
PriceWaterhouseCoopers (2019) Main trends and challenges in the space sector. PWC, Paris
Reagan R (1985) Determination under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, memorandum for the United States trade representative. The President of the US, White House, Washington, DC
Rostow E (1968) President’s task force on communications policy, final report. Superintendent of Documents, US Government Printing Office (GPO 0-351-636), Washington, DC
Snow M (1976) Communication via satellite – a vision in retrospect. A.W. Sijthoff International Publishing Company, Boston
Snow M (1987a) National monopoly in INTELSAT: cost estimation and policy implications for a separate system issue. Telemetics Inform 4(2):133–150
Snow M (1987b) An economic issue in international telecommunications: national monopoly in commercial satellite systems. In: Macauley MM (ed) Economics and technology in space policy. R.F.F., Washington, DC
USAF (2013) Global horizons final report. United States Air Force, SAF/PA Public Release case no. 2013-0434, June, US
Zervos V (1998) Competitiveness of the European space industry, lessons from Europe’s role in NATO. J Space Policy 14(1):39–47
Zervos V (2002) The economics of the European space industry. DPhil thesis, University of York
Zervos V (2011) Conflict in space. In: Braddon L, Hartley K (eds) Handbook of the economics of conflict. Edward Edgar Publishers, Cheltenham
Zervos V (2018) Vasilis Zervos: “public goods, club goods and specialization in evolving collaborative entities”. In: Vliamos S, Zouboulakis M (eds) Institutionalist perspectives on development – a multidisciplinary approach. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Zervos V, Siegel D (2008) Technology, security and policy implications of future transatlantic partnerships in space: lessons from Galileo. Res Policy 37:1630–1642
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Zervos, V. (2020). Political Economy of Outer Space Security. In: Handbook of Space Security. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22786-9_101-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22786-9_101-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22786-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22786-9
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering