Skip to main content

Misconceptions and Alternative Conceptions in Mathematics Education

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education

Definition

The term “misconception” implies incorrectness or error due to the prefix “mis.” However its connotation never implies errors from a child’s perspective. From a child’s perspective, it is a reasonable and viable conception based on their experiences in different contexts or in their daily life activities. When children’s conceptions are deemed to be in conflict with the accepted meanings in mathematics, the term misconceptions has tended to be used. Therefore some researchers or educators prefer to use the term “alternative conception” instead of “misconception.” Other terms sometimes used for misconceptions or terms related to misconceptions include students’ mental models, children’s arithmetic, preconceptions, naïve theories, conceptual primitives, private concepts, alternative frameworks, and critical barriers.

Some researchers avoid using the term “misconceptions,” as they consider them as misapprehensions and partial comprehensions that develop and change over the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Confrey J (1987) Misconceptions across subject matter: science, mathematics and programming. In: Novak JD (ed) Proceedings of the second international seminar: misconceptions and educational strategies in science and mathematics. Cornell University, Ithaca, pp 81–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Confrey J, Kazak S (2006) A thirty-year reflection on constructivism in mathematics education in PME. In: Gutierrez A, Boero P (eds) Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: past, present and future. Sense, Rotterdam, pp 305–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis R (1976) The children’s mathematics project: the syracuse/illinois component. J Child Behav 1:32–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Erlwanger S (1975) Case studies of children’s conceptions of mathematics. J Child Behav 1(3):157–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg H (1976) The children’s mathematical project: an overview of the Cornell component. J Child Behav 1(1):7–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan J, Williams J (2007) Children’s mathematics 4–15: learning from errors and misconceptions. Open University Press, Maidenhead

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey K (2005) Travelling the road to expertise: a longitudinal study of learning. In: Chick HL, Vincent JL (eds) Proceedings of the 29th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education, vol 1. University of Melbourne, Melbourne, pp 19–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi A (2006) Characteristics of Japanese mathematics lessons. Tsukuba J Educ Stud Math 25:37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson JM (2011) Foundations for improving statistical literacy. Stat J IAOS 27:197–204. https://doi.org/10.3233/SJI20110728

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toshiakira Fujii .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Fujii, T. (2020). Misconceptions and Alternative Conceptions in Mathematics Education. In: Lerman, S. (eds) Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_114

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics