Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson A, Hamilton RJ, Hattie J (2004) Classroom climate and motivated behavior in secondary schools. Learn Environ Res 7(3):211–225
Csikszentmihalyi M (1997) Finding flow: the psychology of engagement with everyday life. The masterminds series. Basic Books, New York
Esmonde I (2009) Mathematics learning in groups: Analyzing equity in two cooperative activity structures. The Journal of the Learning Sciences 18(2):247–284
Fraser BJ (1989) Twenty years of classroom climate work: progress and prospect. J Curric Stud 21(4):307–327
Fredricks JA, Blumenfeld PC, Paris AH (2004) School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev Educ Res 74(1):59–109
Goldin GA, Epstein YM, Schorr RY, Warner LB (2011) Beliefs and engagement structures: behind the affective dimension of mathematical learning. ZDM 43(4):547
Hohensee C (2016) Student noticing in classroom settings: a process underlying influences on prior ways of reasoning. J Math Behav 42:69–91
Horn IS (2007) Fast kids, slow kids, lazy kids: framing the mismatch problem in mathematics teachers’ conversations. J Learn Sci 16(1):37–79
Ing M, Webb NM, Franke ML, Turrou AC, Wong J, Shin N, Fernandez CH (2015) Student participation in elementary mathematics classrooms: the missing link between teacher practices and student achievement? Educ Stud Math 90(3):341–356
Jimerson SR, Campos E, Greif JL (2003) Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. Calif Sch Psychol 8(1):7–27
Lobato J, Hohensee C, Rhodehamel B (2013) Students’ mathematical noticing. J Res Math Educ 44(5):809–850
Middleton J, Jansen A, Goldin G (2017) The complexities of mathematical engagement: Motivation, affect, and social interactions. In J. Cai (Ed.) First Compendium for Research in Mathematics Education (chapter 25, p. 667–699), Reston, VA: NCTM
Peterson PL, Janicki TC (1979) Individual characteristics and children’s learning in large-group and small-group approaches. J Educ Psychol 71(5):677
Peterson PL, Swing SR, Stark KD, Waas GA (1984) Students’ cognitions and time on task during mathematics instruction. Am Educ Res J 21(3):487–515
Sanchez Leal L, Schorr RY, Warner LB (2013) Being challenged in an urban classroom: a case study documenting the engagement of a young male who wanted to “look smart”. J Urban Learn Teach Res 9:78–88
Schiefele U, Csikszentmihalyi M (1995) Motivation and ability as factors in mathematics experience and achievement. J Res Math Educ 26(2):163–181
Shernoff DJ (2013) Optimal learning environments to promote student engagement. Springer, New York
Shernoff DJ, Csikszentmihalyi M (2009) Flow in schools: cultivating engaged learners and optimal learning environments. In: Gilman RC, Heubner ES, Furlong MJ (eds) Handbook of positive psychology in schools. Routledge, New York, pp 131–145
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Jansen, A. (2020). Engagement with Mathematics. In: Lerman, S. (eds) Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_100040
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_100040
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-15788-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-15789-0
eBook Packages: EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education