Skip to main content

Secession and Self-Determination

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Peace and Conflict Studies

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, G. (2013). Secession in International Law and Relations: What Are We Talking About? In L.A. Loyola (Ed) International and Comparative Law Review, 35, 343–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G. (2016). Unilateral non-colonial secession and internal self-determination: right of newly seceded peoples to democracy. Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, 34(1), 1–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereketeab, R. (2014). Self-determination and secession – African challenges. In R. Bereketeab (Ed.), Self-determination and secession: The post-colonial state (pp. 3–19). New York City: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brilmayer, L. (1991). Secession and self-determination: A territorial interpretation. Yale Journal of International Law, 16, 177–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassese, A. (2005). International law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catala, A. (2013). Remedial theories of secession and territorial justification. Journal of Social Philosophy, 44(1), 74–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christakis, T. (2011). The ICJ advisory opinion on Kosovo: Has international law something to say about secession? Leiden Journal of International Law, 24, 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coggins, B. (2011). Friends in high places: International politics and the emergence of states from secessionism. International Organization, 65(3), 433–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, J. (2006). The creation of states in international law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, J. (2012). Brownlie’s principles of public international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Driest, S. (2015). Crimea’s separation from Ukraine: An analysis of the right to self-determination and (remedial) secession in international law. Netherlands International Law Review, 62, 329–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, L. M. (1992). International law of secession: New rules for new era. Houston Journal of International Law, 14(3), 521–564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, M. (1999). The right to self-determination in international politics: Six theories in search of a policy. Review of International Studies, 25, 355–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, R. (2014). The future of self-determination and territorial integrity in the Asian century. The Pacific Review, 27(3), 457–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannum, H. (1996). Autonomy, sovereignty, and self-determination: The accommodation of conflicting rights.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • International Court of Justice. (2010). Advisory Opinion of 22 July 2010 on Accordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapustin, A. (2015). Crimea’s self-determination in the light of contemporary international law. Heidelberg Journal of International Law, 75, 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissinger, H. (1994). Diplomacy. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klabbers, J. (2019). Shrinking self-determination: The Chagos opinion of the international court of justice. ESIL Reflections, 8(2), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. (2012). The identity argument for national self-determination. Public Affairs Quarterly, 26(2), 123–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCorquodale, R. (2018). Group rights. In D. Moeckli, S. Shah, & S. Sivakumaran (Eds.), International human rights law (pp. 344–365). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J. (2018). The great delusion. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meester, D. (2010). The International Court of Justice’s Kosovo case: Assessing the current state of international legal opinion on remedial secession. The Canadian Yearbook of International Law, 48, 215–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. (1997). On national self-determination. Political Studies, 45, 900–913.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellet, A. (1992). The opinions of the Badinter arbitration committee: A second breath for the self-determination of peoples. European Journal of International Law, 3, 178–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portman, R. (2010). Legal personality in international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seshagiri, L. (2010). Democratic disobedience: Reconceiving self-determination and secession at international law. Harvard International Law Journal, 51(2), 553–598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterio, M. (2010). On the right to external self-determination: Selfistans, secession, and the great powers’ rule. Minnesota Journal of International Law, 19(1), 137–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterio, M. (2015). Self-determination and secession under international law: The new framework. ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law, 21(2), 293–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasco, Z. A. (2014). Self-determination and secession: Human rights-based conflict resolution. International Community Law Review, 16(1), 75–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitz, E. (2015). Self-determination: How a German Enlightenment idea became a slogan of national liberation and a human right. American Historical Review, 120(2), 462–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welhengama, G., & Pillay, N. (2013). Minorities’ claim to secession by virtue of the right to self-determination: Asian perspectives with special reference to Kosovo and Sri Lanka. Nordic Journal of International Law, 82, 249–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, M. (2009). Settling self-determination conflicts: Recent developments. The European Journal of International Law, 20(1), 111–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilde, R. (2011). Self-determination, secession, and dispute settlement after the Kosovo advisory opinion. Leiden Journal of International Law, 24, 149–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Muharremi .

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Muharremi, R., Dragusha, N. (2020). Secession and Self-Determination. In: The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11795-5_51-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11795-5_51-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-11795-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-11795-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Political Science and International StudiesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics