Skip to main content

Ecosystem Services and Sustainable Development

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education

Abstract

The paper aims on the characterization of the role of ecosystem services (ES) in the frame of sustainable development. ES are services produced by ecosystems through the function of the compartments of the respective ecosystem that provide essential benefits to human (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC, ISBN 1-59726-040-1, 2005). They include purification of drinking water and air, climate regulation, pest and disease control, pollination, and other mechanisms of supporting food production, medicinal resources, flood regulation, and the recreational value. The paper presents the current status on ES assessment frameworks and their classification as well as typology and provides insights into the intrinsic value and the approaches for economic valorisation of ES. Sustainable development is a driving force for the effectiveness of ES which aims particularly also to defragmentation of environment as well as social and economic aspects. Nature conservation provides lessons on reintegration. These strategies go beyond conventional spatial and conservation planning as the focus is a holistic reintegration. In terms of ES, the lessons to be learned lead to nature-based planning solutions, for instance, for climate change adaptation or flood protection. But the role of ES goes much beyond this, having in view also the future role of cultural ecosystem services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Antrop M (2005) Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landsc Urban Plan 70(1–2):21–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergen V, Löwenstein W, Olschewski R (2013) Forstökonomie – Ansätze für eine vernünftige Umwelt- und Landnutzung. Vahlen, München, 477 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd J, Banzhaf S (2007) What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol Econ 63:616–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhard B, Maes J (eds) (2017) Mapping ecosystem services. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, 376 pp. Open Access

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkhard B, Kandziora M, Hou Y, Müller F (2014) Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands – concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification. Landsc Online 34:1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Shacham E, Walters G, Janzen C, Maginnis S (eds) (2016) Nature-based solutions to address global societal challenges. IUCN, Gland, xiii + 97pp. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2016.13.en. ISBN 978-2-8317-1812-5

  • De Groot R, Fisher B, Christie M, Aronson J, Braat L, Gowdy J, Haines-Young R, Maltby E, Neuville A, Polasky S, Portella R, Ring I (2010) Integrating the ecological and economic dimensions in biodiversity and ecosystem service valuation. In: Kumar P (ed) TEEB – The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations. Earthscan, London/Washington, DC, pp 9–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (1997) Cannibals with forks – triple bottom line of 21st century business. New Society Publishers, Stoney Creek

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission, FET Advisory Group (2016) The need to integrate the Social Sciences and Humanities with Science and Engineering in Horizon 2020 and beyond. European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • European Environment Agency (2011) Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES). Paper prepared for discussion at the expert meeting on ecosystem accounts organised by the UNSD, the EEA and the World Bank, London, December 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union (2016) Mapping and assessment of ecosystems and their services – mapping and assessing the condition of Europe’s ecosystems: progress and challenges, 3rd report – final, March 2016. https://doi.org/10.2779/351581. ISBN 978-92-79-55019-5

  • Fish R, Church A, Winter M (2016) Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: a novel framework for research and critical engagement. Ecosyst Serv 21: 208–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher B, Turner K (2008) Ecosystem services: classification for valuation. Biol Conserv 141:1167–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hersperger AM, Bürgi M (2009) Going beyond landscape change description: quantifying the importance of driving forces of landscape change in a Central Europe case study. Land Use Policy 26:640–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff H (2011) Understanding the Nexus. Background paper for the Bonn 2011 conference: the water, energy and food security Nexus. Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI), Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • IPBES (2016) Decision IPBES-214: conceptual framework for the intergovernmental science – policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. http://www.ipbes.het/

  • Kabisch N, Korn H, Stadler J, Bonn A (2017) Nature-based solutions to climate change in urban areas – linkages of science, policy and practice. Theory and practice of urban sustainability transitions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56091-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Langemeyer J, Camps-Calvet M, Calvet-Mir L, Barthel S, Gómez-Baggethun E (2017) Stewardship of urban ecosystem services: understanding the value(s) of urban gardens in Barcelona. Landsc Urban Plan. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.013

  • Lindborg R, Eriksson O (2004) Historical landscape connectivity affects present plant species diversity. Ecology 85:1840–1845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC. ISBN 1-59726-040-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Naturkapital Deutschland – TEEB DE (2012) Der Wert der Natur für Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft – Eine Einführung. ifuplan/Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung – UFZ/Bundesamt für Naturschutz, München/Leipzig/Bonn. Download 14.10.2014. http://www.naturkapital-teeb.de/publikationen/projekteigene-publikationen.html

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Farrell PJ, Anderson PML (2010) Sustainable multifunctional landscapes: a review to implementation. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2:59–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olschewski R (2017) Bewertung von Ökosystemleistungen: eine Bestandsaufnahme. Schweiz Z Forstwes 168(1):3–13. Perspectives

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascual U, Balvanera P, Diaz S, Pataki G, Roth E, Stenseke M, Watson RT, Dessane EB, Islar M, Kelemen E, Maris V, Quaas M, Subramanian SM, Wittmer H, Adlan A, Ahn S, Al-Hafedh YS, Amankwah E, Asah ST, Berry P, Bilgin A, Breslow SJ, Bullock C, Caceres D, Hamed Daly-Hassen H, Figueroa E, Golden CD, Gomez-Baggethun E, Gonzalez-Jimenez D, Houdet J, Keune H, Kumar R, Ma K, May PH, Mead A, O’Farrell P, Pandit R, Pengue W, Pichis-Madruga R, Popa F, Preston S, Pacheco-Balanza D, Saarikoski H, Strassburg BB, van den Belt M, Verma M, Wickson F, Yagi N (2017) Valuing nature’s contributions to people: the IPBES approach. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 26:7–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plieninger T, Kizos T, Bieling C, Le Dû-Blayo L, Budniok M-A, Bürgi M, Crumley CL, Girod G, Howard P, Kolen J, Kuemmerle T, Milcinski G, Palang H, Trommler K, Verburg PH (2015) Exploring ecosystem-change and society through a landscape lens: recent progress in European landscape research. Ecol Soc 20(2):5. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07443-200205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roetman PEJ, Daniels CB (2011) Creating sustainable communities in a changing world. Crawford House Publishing, Adelaide, p 262

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt K, Walz A, Martín-López B, Sachse R (2017) Testing socio-cultural valuation methods of ecosystem services to explain land use preferences. Ecosyst Serv 26:270–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider P, Popovici LD (2019) Approaches for the implementation of water-related cultural ecosystem services in teaching programs on sustainable development. In: Leal Filho W, McCrea AC (eds) Sustainability and humanities. Springer, Cham, pp 267–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95336-6 (online first)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider P, Folkens L, Busch M (2018) The teaching-research-practice nexus as framework for the implementation of sustainability in curricula in higher education. In: Leal Filho W (ed) Implementing sustainability in the curriculum of universities. World sustainability series. Springer, Cham, pp 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70281-0_8. ISBN 978-3-319-70280-3 (online first)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schröter M (2017) Do ecosystem services and sustainability fit together? ESP-DE Blog. http://www.esp-de.de/passen-oekosystemleistungen-und-nachhaltigkeit-zusammen/. Accessed 02 Dec 2017

  • Schröter M, vander zanden EH, van Oudenhoven APE, Remme RP, Sema-chavet HM, de Groot RS, Opdam P (2014) Ecosystem services as a contested concept: a synthesis of critique and counter-arguments. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.1209n. Conservation letters

  • Teal JM, Weinstein MP (2002) Ecological engineering, design, and construction considerations for marsh restorations in Delaware Bay, USA. Ecol Eng 18:607–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TEEB (2010) The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: mainstreaming the economics of nature: a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. http://www.theweb.org/our-publications/teeb-study-reports/synthesis-report/

  • United Nations (2015) Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations – Sustainable Development Knowledge Platform, 25.09.2015

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann RC (2006) Recording rural landscapes and their cultural associations: some initial results and impressions. Environ Sci Policy 9(4):360–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2006.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zölch T, Wamsler C, Pauleit S (2018) Integrating the ecosystem-based approach into municipal climate adaptation strategies: the case of Germany. J Clean Prod 170:966–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.146

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The current contribution was prepared in the context of the project “Water Management and Climate Change in the Focus of International Master Programs WATERMAS” funded by the Erasmus+ Program of the European Union. In this regard, this manuscript reflects only the views of the authors; as such, the European Union cannot be held responsible for these views or any future use of them.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petra Schneider .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Schneider, P., Belousova, A. (2019). Ecosystem Services and Sustainable Development. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11352-0_423

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics