Skip to main content

Prosocial Behavior and Sustainable Development

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education

Definition

Prosocial behavior is considered a social behavior that benefits other individuals or even the society as a whole, comprising actions such as helping, volunteering, donating, or sharing.

Introduction

Prosocial behavior represents voluntary behavior intended to benefit either another individual or society as a whole (Aronson et al. 2005; Eisenberg et al. 2007) by engaging in behaviors such as helping, sharing, donating, cooperating, and volunteering as well as complying with the rules and remaining compatible with socially accepted behaviors (Brief and Motowidlo 1986). These actions stem from a range of motivations, whether sympathy or concerns over welfare, egoistic or practical concerns, such as the individual’s social status and reputation (Eisenberg et al. 2007). As such, altruism and empathy feature among the relevant motivating factors (Straubhaar et al. 2009).

Altruism might be considered as a “subcategory” of prosocial behavior. Borden and Francis (1978) theorize...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 849.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ajzen I, Madden JT (1986) Prediction of goal-directed behaviour: attitudes, intention, and perceived behavioral control. J Exp Psychol 22:453–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen JB, Ferrand J (1999) Environmental locus of control, sympathy, and proenvironmental behavior: a test of Geller’s actively caring hypothesis. Environ Behav 31(3):338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson E, Wilson TD, Akert RM (2005) Social psychology, 5th edn. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Balderjahn I (1988) Personality variables and environmental attitudes as predictors of ecologically responsible consumption patterns. J Bus Res 17:51–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batson CD, Thompson ER, Chen H (2002) Moral hypocrisy: addressing some alternatives. J Pers Soc Psychol 77:525–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borden D, Francis JL (1978) Who cares about ecology? Personality and sex difference in environmental concern. J Pers 46:190–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brick C, Sherman D, Kim HS (2017) “Green to be seen” and “brown to keep down”: visibility moderates the effect of identity on pro-environmental behaviour. J Environ Psychol 51:226–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brief AP, Motowidlo SJ (1986) Prosocial organizational behaviors. Acad Manag Rev 11(4):710–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caprara GV, Alessandri G, Eisenberg N (2012) Prosociality: the contribution of traits, values, and self-efficacy beliefs. J Pers Soc Psychol 102(6):1289–1303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clayton S (2003) Environmental identity: a conceptual and an operational definition. In: Clayton S, Opotow S (eds) Identity and the natural environment: the psychological significance of nature. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 45–65

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cleveland M, Kalamas M, Laroche M (2005) Shades of green: linking environmental locus of control and pro-environmental behaviors. J Consum Mark 22(4):198–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Groot J, Steg L (2009). Morality and prosocial behavior: The role of awareness, responsibility and norms in the normactivation model. J Pers Soc Psychol 149:425–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg N, Fabes RA, Spinrad TL (2007) Prosocial development. In: Handbook of child psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0311

  • Ellemers N, Spears R, Doosje B (2002) Self and social identity. Annu Rev Psychol 53(1):161–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geller ES (1991) If only more would actively care. J Appl Behav Anal 24:607–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am J Sociol 91:481–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollmuss A, Agyeman J (2002) Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ Educ Res 8(3):239–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P, Ghodeswar B (2015) Factors affecting consumers’ green product purchase decisions. Mark Intell Plan 33(3):330–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laroche M, Bergeron J, Barbaro-Forleo G (2001) Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products. J Consum Mark 18(6):503–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood JM, Muraven M (2015) Self-control depletion does not diminish attitudes about being prosocial but does diminish prosocial behaviors. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 37:68–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ottman JA (2011) The new rules of green marketing. Strategies, tools, and inspiration for sustainable branding. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz SH (1977) Normative influences on altruism. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 10. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern PC (2000) New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J Soc Issues 56(3):407–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Straubhaar JD, LaRose R, Davenport L (2009) Media now: understanding media, culture, and technology. Wadsworth, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Welte T, Anastasio P (2010) To conserve or not to conserve: is status the question? Environ Behav 42(6):845–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zabkar V, Hosta M (2013) Willingness to act and environmentally conscious consumer behaviour: can prosocial status perceptions help overcome the gap? Int J Consum Stud 37:257–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arminda Paço .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Paço, A. (2019). Prosocial Behavior and Sustainable Development. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Encyclopedia of Sustainability in Higher Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11352-0_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics