Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies

2020 Edition
| Editors: Arthur Tatnall

Online Teaching, Emotions, and Emoticons in Computer-Mediated Communication

  • Cornelia ConnollyEmail author
  • Mayank Singh Parihar
  • Nicola Marsden
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_78
  • 5 Downloads

Synonyms

Introduction

The most natural and perhaps richest form of communication is face-to-face communication, but due to the growth of computer systems and Internet usage during the past three decades, new ways of communication have emerged. Computer-mediated communication can be defined as human communication that is maintained or altered through machines. For effective communication, cues other than verbal are important, especially to develop relationships (Walther and Parks 2002). In face-to-face (F2F) communication, emotions are expressed by appearance, facial expression, gesture, and postures, but in CMC social cues are replaced by content, style, and timing of verbal online messages (Walther and Parks 2002). To fill the gap and deal with the lack of nonverbal cues in text-based communication, the interaction has to include some nonverbal cues to express emotion over a period of time.

The term paralanguage...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Carey J (1980) Paralanguage in computer mediated communication. Alternate Media Center, New York University, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen Z-Z, Liu M (2006) Computer mediated communication, social network and service industry. In: Service systems and service management, International Conference, Vol 2, 1346–1349Google Scholar
  3. Connolly C, Parihar MS, Marsden M (2017) Online teaching and communication: Emotions in computer mediated communication. Paper presented at The World Conference on Computers in Education, DublinGoogle Scholar
  4. Daejoong K, Frank MG, Kim ST (2013) Emotional display behavior in different forms of computer mediated communication. Comput Hum Behav 30:222–229Google Scholar
  5. Dresner E, Herring SC (2010) Functions of the non-verbal in CMC: emoticons and illocutionary force. Commun Theory 20:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hancock JT, Landrigan C, Silver C (2007) Expressing emotion in text-based communication. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2007), 929–932Google Scholar
  7. Houston JE (ed) (1984) Thesaurus of ERIC descriptors, 10th edn. Oryx Press, PhoenixGoogle Scholar
  8. Loveday L (1982) The sociolinguistics of learning and using a non-native language. Pergamon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  9. Marvin L (1995) Spoof, spam, lurk, and lag: the aesthetics of text-based virtual realities. J Comput-Mediat Commun 1:2Google Scholar
  10. Pennycook A (1985) Actions speak louder than words: paralanguage, communication, and education. TESOL Q 19(2):259–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Rezabek LL, Cochenour JJ (1998) Visual cues in computer-mediated communication: supplementing text with emoticons. J Vis Lit 18(2):201–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Trager GL (1958) Paralanguage: A First Approximation. Studies in Linguistics 13:1–12.Google Scholar
  13. Vandergriff I (2013) Emotive communication online: a contextual analysis of computer-mediated communication (CMC) cues. J Pragmat 51(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Walther JB, D’Addario KP (2001) The impacts of emoticons in message interpretation. Soc Sci Comput Rev 19(3):324–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Walther JB, Parks MR (2002) Cues filtered out, cues filtered in: computer-mediated communication and relationships. In: Handbook of interpersonal communication, vol 3. Sage, Thousand Oaks, 529–563Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cornelia Connolly
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mayank Singh Parihar
    • 2
  • Nicola Marsden
    • 2
  1. 1.School of EducationNational University of Ireland (NUI)GalwayIreland
  2. 2.Faculty of Computer ScienceHeilbronn UniversityHeilbronnGermany

Section editors and affiliations

  • Don Passey
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Technology Enhanced Learning, Department of Educational ResearchLancaster UniversityLancasterUK