Skip to main content

Technology-Enhanced Learning

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:

Synonyms

E-learning

Introduction

Technology-enhanced learning (TEL) is concerned with using technologies to support learning whether the learning is local (i.e., on campus) or remote (at home or in the workplace). Historically, these technologies have included instructional films, radio, and television (Westera 2010), but in the current day, technology-enhanced learning pertains more to the use of computer-based technologies, including smartphones and other smart devices.

Learning can be considered as a process whereby the learner accesses concepts and ideas, assimilating these through practice and ultimately demonstrating mastery. Enhancements of learning seek to improve parts of this practice and process. With the progress of technologies, such enhancements are achieved through the facilitations of fundamental activities of learning by technology in various forms. Thus, what technology-enhanced learning ultimately offers are scalability, flexibility, and new methods of facilitating...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bailey C, Card K (2009) Effective pedagogical practices for online teaching: perception of experienced instructors. Internet High Educ 12(3–4):152–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copley J (2007) Audio and video podcasts of lectures for campus based students: production and evaluation of student use. Innov Educ Teach Int 44(4):387–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer-Torregrosa J, Jiménez-Rodríguez M, Torralba-Estelles J, Garzón-Farinós F, Pérez-Bermejo M, Fernández-Ehrling N (2016) Distance learning ects and flipped classroom in the anatomy learning: comparative study of the use of augmented reality, video and notes. BMC Med Educ 16(1):230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham P (2005) Web 2.0. [online] Paulgraham.com. Retrieved from: http://www.paulgraham.com/web20.html

  • Guri-Rosenblit S, Gros B (2011) E-Learning: confusing terminology, research gaps and inherent challenges. Int J E-Learning Dist Educ [online] 25(1). Retrieved from: http://ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/729/1206

  • Jamali S, Shiratuddin M, Wong K, Oskam C (2015) Utilising Mobile-augmented reality for learning human anatomy. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 197:659–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • JISC (2011, 22 July) Technology enhanced learning environments. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/whatwedo/programmes/elearning/tele.aspx

  • Kirkwood A, Price L (2013) Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learn Media Technol 39(1):6–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küçük S, Kapakin S, Göktaş Y (2016) Learning anatomy via mobile augmented reality: effects on achievement and cognitive load. Anat Sci Educ 9(5):411–421. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard D (2002) Rethinking university teaching: a framework for the effective use of educational technology, 2nd edn. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer RE (1997) Multimedia learning: are we asking the right questions? Educ Psychol 32:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray J (2013) Composing multimodality. Bedford-St. Martin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly T (2005). What is web 2.0. [online] Oreilly.com. Retrieved from: https://www.oreilly.com/pub/a/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html?page=1

  • Passey D (2013) Inclusive technology enhanced learning: overcoming cognitive, physical, emotional and geographic challenges. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Salkind N (2010) Pretest–posttest design. In: Encyclopedia of research design. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288.n331

  • Sankey M, Birch D, Gardiner M (2010) Engaging students through multimodal learning environments: the journey continues. Paper presented at the ASCILITE, Sydney, pp 852–863

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott C (2015) The futures of learning 3: what kind of pedagogies for the 21st century?. [ebook] UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000243126

  • Sen A (2012) Designing clicker questions that encourage active learning in a tech enhanced practical lab setting. In: INTED2012 proceedings. International association of technology, education and development, Spain, pp 3246–3255. ISBN: 978-84-615-5563-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A, Liew SH (2019) Augmented reality and its use in education. In: Tatnall A (ed) Encyclopedia of education and information technologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_211-1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sen A, Passey D (2013) Globalisation of next generation Technology Enhanced Learning Environments (TELEs) for learning: contexualizations in the Asia-pacific region. In: IEEE proceedings: fifth international conference on technology for education (T4E 2013). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) Computer Society, IIT Kharagpur, pp 111–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A, Selvaratnam L (2012) Affordances of an innovative ecosystem of multiple tabletops and Anatomy resources for supporting collaborative practical learning. In: Lee J et al. (eds) Proceedings of the 20th international conference on computers in education. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education, pp 79–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Shieh RS (2012) The impact of technology-enabled active learning (TEAL) implementation on student learning and teachers’ teaching in a high school context. Comput Educ 59:206–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan R (2009) Principles for constructing good clicker questions: going beyond rote learning and stimulating active engagement with course content. J Educ Technol Syst 37(3):335–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor L, Clark S (2010) Educational design of short, audio-only podcasts: the teacher and student experience. Australas J Educ Technol 26(3). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1082

  • Ti-Shen ET, Sen A (2019) Effective use of interactive videos as an educational tool in higher education – an Asian context, EDULEARN19 proceedings, Palma, Spain, pp 10379–10385. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2019.2610

  • Vartabedian RA (2002) Funding smart classrooms: administrating technological advances. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, New Orleans

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller M (2007) Virtual learning environments: using, choosing and developing your VLE. Routledge, Oxford, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Westera W (2010) Technology-enhanced learning: review and prospects. Serdica J Comput 4(2):159–182. [online]. Retrieved from: http://sci-gems.math.bas.bg/jspui/handle/10525/1589

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arkendu Sen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Sen, A., Leong, C.K.C. (2020). Technology-Enhanced Learning. In: Tatnall, A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_72

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics