Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies

2020 Edition
| Editors: Arthur Tatnall

Digital Storytelling in Teaching and Research

  • Marianna VivitsouEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_58
  • 4 Downloads

Synonyms

Introduction

The aim of this entry is to present digital storytelling as teaching and research method and draw from findings of previous studies in order to offer an updated definition based on both essential dimensions, the activity of telling stories and the use of digital technologies. Toward this end, the term will be considered as a metaphorical noun phrase. Words can be identified as metaphors at the level of language when they display a contrast between a target domain meaning and a more basic source domain meaning; also, at the level of thought, when they display a contrast between concepts that belong to different conceptual domains; and finally, at the level of communication, when they are used as metaphors to indicate a change of perspective of the target domain of an utterance. In all these cases, a contrast or comparison is involved in metaphorical meaning. More...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Buckingham D (2015) Defining digital literacy – what do young people need to know about digital media? Nordic J Digit Lit 10:21–35.  https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Engen BK, Giaever TH, Mifsud L (2015) Guidelines and regulations for teaching digital competence in schools and teacher education: a weak link? Nordic J Digit Lit 10:172–186.  https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Eteläpelto A, Vähäsantanen K, Hökkä P (2015) How do novice teachers in Finland perceive their professional agency? Teach Teach 21(6):660–680.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2015.1044327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kaplan DM (2003) Ricoeur’s critical theory. SUNY, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Kramsch C (2009) The multilingual subject. OUP, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  6. Kress G (2011) Multimodal discourse analysis from: the Routledge handbook of discourse analysis. Routledge. Accessed 29 Sept 2017, https://www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780203809068.ch3
  7. Kvale S, Brinkmann S (2009) Interviews – learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing. SAGE, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Lakoff G (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In: Ortony A (ed) Metaphor and thought, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 202–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lakoff G, Johnson M (1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  10. Lambert J (2013) Digital storytelling: capturing lives, creating community. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lankshear C, Knobel M (2015) Digital literacy and digital literacies: – policy, pedagogy and research considerations for education. Nordic J Digit Lit 10:8–20.  https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lund A (2006) The multiple contexts of online language teaching. Lang Teach Res 10(2):181–204.  https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168806lr191oaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Macy L (2016) Bridging pedagogies: drama, multiliteracies, and the zone of proximal development. Educ Forum 80(3):310–323.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2016.1173750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mariotti MA (2009) Artifacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective: the role of the teacher. ZDM 41:427–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McGee P (2015) The instructional value of digital storytelling: higher education, professional, and adult learning settings. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Moll L, Whitmore K (1993) Vygotsky in educational settings: moving from individual transmission to social transaction. In: Forman E, Minick N, Stone A (eds) Contexts for learning: sociocultural dynamics in children’s development. O.U.P, Oxford, pp 19–42Google Scholar
  17. Murray SJ (1997) Hamlet on the holodeck: the future of narrative in cyberspace. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Niemi H, Multisilta J (2016) Digital storytelling promoting twenty-first century skills and student engagement. Technol Pedagog Educ.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2015.1074610
  19. Niemi H, Harju V, Vivitsou M, Viitanen K, Multisilta J, Kuokkanen A (2014) Digital storytelling for 21st-century skills in virtual learning environments. Creat Educ 5(9):657–671.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.59078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Norton B (2010) Language and identity. In: Hornberger N, McKay S (eds) Sociolinguistics and language education. Multilingual Matters, Bristol, pp 349–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Norton B, Toohey K (2011) Identity, language learning, and social change. Lang Teach 44(4):412–446.  https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444811000309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ørevik S (2015) From book to screen: changing genre patterns and communicative purposes. Nordic J Digit Lit 2:102–120.  https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1891-943XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pavlenko A, Norton B (2007) Imagined communities, identity, and English language teaching. In: Cummins J, Davison C (eds) International handbook of English language teaching. Springer, New York, pp 669–680.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-46301-8_43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Penttilä J, Kallunki V, Niemi HM, Multisilta J (2016) A structured inquiry into a digital story: primary school students report the making of a superball. Int J Mob Blended Learn 8(3):19–34.  https://doi.org/10.4018/ijmbl.2016070102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reijnierse WG (2017) The value of deliberate metaphor. University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Doctoral DissertationGoogle Scholar
  26. Ricoeur P (1978) The rule of metaphor: multi-disciplinary studies of the creation of meaning in language (trans: Czerny R with McLaughlin K, J Costello SJ). Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Ricoeur P (1992) Oneself as another (trans: Kathleen B). University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  28. Steen GJ (2011) The contemporary theory of metaphor – now new and improved! Rev Cogn Linguist 9(1):26–64.  https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.9.1.03steCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Thompson I (2013) The mediation of learning in the zone of proximal development through a co-constructed writing activity. Res Teach Engl 47(3):247–276Google Scholar
  30. Thorne SL, Black RW (2011) Identity and interaction in internet-mediated contexts. In: Higgins C (ed) Negotiating the self in a second language: identity formation and cross-cultural adaptation in a globalizing world. Mouton de Gruyter, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Vivitsou M (2016) Social media and networks as communicative acts: vulnerabilities and possibilities for the pedagogies of the future an empirical hermeneutical study of Finnish and Greek teachers’ and students’ experiences. University of Helsinki, Finland. Doctoral dissertation. Accessed online: 1.1.2018. Available: https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/161007/Socialme.pdf?sequence=1
  32. Vivitsou M (in press) Values and purposes in digital pedagogies: a meta-analysis on Finnish & Greek teachers’ metaphorical thinking. In: Sharma R (ed) Innovative applications of online pedagogy & course design. IGI Global, USAGoogle Scholar
  33. Vivitsou M, Viitanen K (2015) The pedagogies of the future: through young people’s eyes in storytelling experiences with the digital in Finland and Greece. In: Zlitni S, Lienard F (eds) Electronic communication: political, social and educational uses. Peter Lang Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften, Bern, pp 110–123Google Scholar
  34. Vivitsou M, Kallunki V, Niemi HM, Penttilä JSM, Harju AV (2016) Student-driven knowledge creation through digital storytelling. In: Niemi H, Jia J (eds) New ways to teach and learn in China and Finland: crossing boundaries with technology. Peter Lang, Frankfurt, pp 35–54 20 pGoogle Scholar
  35. Vivitsou M, Niemi H, Wei G, Kallunki V, Miao R (2017) Teachers’ practices to support student work in digital storytelling: a study on Finnish and Chinese school teachers’ experiences. In: Seminar.net International Journal of Media, technology and Lifelong Learning), vol. 13, no. 2, 2017. ISSN: 1504–4831. Available: https://journals.hioa.no/index.php/seminar/article/view/2306
  36. Wass R, Golding C (2014) Sharpening a tool for teaching: the zone of proximal development. Teach High Educ 19(6):671–684.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.901958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Woodhouse, J. (2008). Storytelling: a telling approach in healthcare education. Paper presented at the Narrative Practitioner Conference, Wrexham, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  38. Zaretskii VK (2009) The zone of proximal development. J Russ East Eur Psychol 47(6):70–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CICERO Learning, Faculty of Educational SciencesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Section editors and affiliations

  • Jari Multisilta
    • 1
  1. 1.Satakunta University of Applied SciencesPoriFinland