Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies

2020 Edition
| Editors: Arthur Tatnall

Implementation of ICT in Secondary Schools

  • Pieter HogenbirkEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_26



In this document we will address how secondary schools (with pupils in the age of 12–18) can implement ICT in their educational system. We will use three different models or frameworks to guide such implementation. At first we distinguish between two ways of looking at ICT in education. On the one hand, educators can use ICT to improve the quality of the educational setting and the learning outcome. On the other hand, ICT should be regarded as a subject in the curriculum: learning about informatics, computer science and information literacy, and developing ICT skills. Being aware of the differences between those two ways of...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Beniger JR (1986) The control revolution: technological and economic origins of the information society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  2. Galvin, Gilleran, Hogenbirk, Hunya, Selinger, Zeidler, Reflections on eTwinning, Collaborations, enrichment and added value (September 2006), Pedagogical issues (October 2006), Cultural understanding and integration, professional development (February 2007). www.etinning.net
  3. Griffiths M (2002) The educational benefits of videogames. Educ Health 20(3). http://sheu.org.uk/sites/sheu.org.uk/files/imagepicker/1/eh203mg.pdf
  4. Hogenbirk P (1997) An educational tool for planning and monitoring the teaching-learning process in Dutch secondary education, ITEM, Hongkong. www.researchgate.net
  5. Hogenbirk P, de Rijcke, et al. (2006), Pupils: it kicks, new ways of learning, Dutch Inspectorate of Education. http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten-en-publicaties/brochures/2008/09/11/pupils-it-kicks.html
  6. Hogenbirk P (2016) ICT in Education: literacy, enhancement and personalization, www.odino.nl/publicaties/ and https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303080210_ICT_in_Education_literacy_enhancement_and_personalization_1. Note from UNESCO: “This paper was commissioned by the UNESCO International Bureau of Education (IBE). It has not been edited nor published by the team. The views and opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author and should not be attributed to the IBE-UNESCO. The paper can be cited with the following reference: “Paper commissioned by the UNESCO International Bureau of Education (IBE), ICT in Education: literacy, enhancement and personalization, please contact ibe.info@unesco.org”
  7. Hogenbirk PG, van de Braak P (2008) ICT action school development on the basis of an inspectorates assessment. LYICT, Malaysia. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10639-012-9224-x
  8. Hogenbirk PG, van de Braak P (2009) ICT action school development on the basis of an inspectorates assessment Part II, WCCE2009. Bento Conçalvez, Brasil. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007%2F978-3-642-03115-1_13.pdf
  9. Hogenbirk PG, van de Braak P (2011) ICT action school development on Helen Parkhurst Dalton school, IIGWE2011. Mombasa, Kenya. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273160594_ICT_Action_School_Development_at_Helen_Parkhurst_Dalton_School_Part_III
  10. ITEA’s Technology for All Americans Project (2006) http://www.iteea.org/TAA/Publications/TAA_Publications.html
  11. Izmestiev D (2012) Personalized learning: a new ICT-enabled education approach. Unesco IITE, Moscow. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002202/220240E.pdf
  12. Jensen JL, Kummer TA, Godoy PDDM (2015) Improvements from a flipped classroom may simply be the fruits of active learning. CBE Life Sci Educ 14(1):ar5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Moss S (2014, January) Making the most of ICT – what the research tells us. http://www.ictineducation.org/home-page/2014/1/29/making-the-most-of-ict-what-the-research-tells-us.html
  14. National educational technology standards for students, 2nd edn. International Society for Technology in Education, ISTE, Eugene (2007)Google Scholar
  15. Oblinger D (2006, May) Simulations, games, and learning. https://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eli3004.pdf
  16. OECD (2006) Are students ready for a technology-rich world? What PISA studies tell us. OECD Publishing, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Oliver M, Trigwell K (2005) Can ‘blended learning’ be redeemed? In: E-Learning, vol 2, no 1. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.17
  18. Prensky M (2001) Digital natives, digital immigrants, from on the horizon, vol 9, no 5. MCB University Press. https://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf
  19. Recommendation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 on key competences for lifelong learning, European Union (2006) http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32006H0962
  20. van Oel B et al (2009a) P2V project, using the European framework for the evaluation of ICT in education. http://p2v.eun.org
  21. van Oel B et al (2009b) P2V project, using the European framework for the evaluation of ICT in education. http://peerlearning.eun.org/shared/data/pdf/P2V_ICT_evaluation_framework_final.pdf
  22. Voogt J, Pareja Roblin N (2010) 21st century skills, discussion paper. http://opite.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/61995295/White%20Paper
  23. Ziehe T (1999) Schule und Jugend – ein Differenzverhältnis. In: Neue Sammlung 39, 4, S. 619–629, ISSN 0028-3355Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Projectbureau Odino BVDoornThe Netherlands

Section editors and affiliations

  • Sigrid Schubert
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty IV: Science and TechnologyUniversity of SiegenSiegenGermany