Skip to main content

Innate Abilities and Learning in Higher Education

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies

Synonyms

Big five personality traits; Culture; Higher education; Learning; UAE

Learning Models

The ever-lurking question that has always engaged educators is what drives students to effectively learn and excel. In their review of the literature, Zhang and Ziegler (2016) reported that although there is a plethora of cognitive, personality, and other narrower traits that contribute to student performance however, meta-analyses have always shown that personality traits that are based on the Big Five (BF) factor model (in particular openness and conscientiousness where conscientiousness was the most powerful predictor across the secondary and tertiary levels followed by openness) contribute to the prediction of student success above and beyond intelligence. The BF are five important factors that are used to describe human personality and behavior, and it is indicated to capture most of individual’s daily differences in behavioral patterns and performance in many domains (Babakhani 2014;...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Babakhani N (2014) The relationship between the big-five model of personality, self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance of Islamic Azad University students. Procedia Soc Behav Sci, 116:3542–3547. 5th World Conference on Educational Sciences – WCES 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbaranelli C, Caprara G, Rabasca A, Pastorelli C (2003) A questionnaire for measuring the Big Five in late childhood. Personal Individ Differ 34(4):645–664

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbaranelli C, Borgogni L, Perugini M (1993) The Big Five questionnaire: a new questionnaire for the measurement of the five factor model. Personal Individ Differ 15:281–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa PT, McCrae RR (1992) Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa

    Google Scholar 

  • De Feyter T, Caers R, Vigna C, Berings D (2012) Unraveling the impact of the Big Five personality traits on academic performance: the moderating and mediating effects of self-efficacy and academic motivation. Learn Individ Differ 22:439–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Digman JM (1990) Personality structure: emergence of the five-factor model. Annu Rev Psychol 41:417–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham S (2006) Listening comprehension: the learners’ perspective. System 34(2):165–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang M, Liu M, Ho H, Chen Y (2014) Using a “prediction–observation–explanation” inquiry model to enhance student interest and intention to continue science learning predicted by their Internet cognitive failure. Comput Educ 72:110–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen-Campbell L, Knack J, Waldrip A, Campbell S (2007) Do Big Five personality traits associated with self-control influence the regulation of anger and aggression? J Res Pers 41(2):403–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John O, Srivastava S (2001) The Big-Five trait taxonomy: history, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In: Pervin L, John OP (eds) Handbook of personality: theory and research, 2nd edn. Guilford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinga R, McInerneyb D, Watkinsa D (2012) Competitiveness is not that bad…at least in the east: testing the hierarchical model of achievement motivation in the Asian setting. Int J Intercult Relat 36(6):446–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn J (2009) Learning orientations: diversity in higher education. Learn Individ Differ 19(2):195–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peetsma T, Van der Veen I (2011) Relations between the development of future time perspective in three life domains, investment in learning, and academic achievement. Learn Instr 21(3):481–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swinton O (2010) The effect of effort grading on learning. Econ Educ Rev 29(6):1176–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vedel A (2014) The Big Five and tertiary academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Personal Individ Differ 71:66–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang J, Ziegler M (2016) How do the big five influence scholastic performance? A big five-narrow traits model or a double mediation model. Learn Individ Differ 50:93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nabeel Al-Qirim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Al-Qirim, N. et al. (2020). Innate Abilities and Learning in Higher Education. In: Tatnall, A. (eds) Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_220

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics