Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies

2020 Edition
| Editors: Arthur Tatnall

Value of Teaching PRINCE2 Project Management Methodology

  • Angela LecomberEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_199
  • 22 Downloads

Synonyms

Introduction

As project management evolves as a field of practice, companies are now realizing that their entire business, including most of the routine activities, can be regarded as a series of projects. Simply stated, businesses are managing their transformations by projects.

There are a number of accepted approaches to project management, the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) and Projects in Controlled Environments Version 2 (PRINCE2) being two of the most important. Recently there has been considerable interest in Agile Project Management.

Joslin and Muller (2015) found that there was a positive relationship between the use of project management methodologies such as PMBOK and PRINCE2 and project success. These are described as project management “best practices” by the respective “owners” which are the Project Management Institute (PMI) and AXELOS, respectively.

The teaching and learning of project management...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Callon M (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St. Brieuc Bay. In: Law J (ed) Power, action & belief. A new sociology of knowledge? Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, pp 196–229Google Scholar
  2. Davey W (2014) ANT, phenomenography and a research question in information systems. Int J Actor-Netw Theory Technol Innov 6(2):1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Joslin R, Muller R (2015) Relationships between a project management methodology and project success in different project governance contexts. Int J Proj Manag 33:1337–1392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Latour B (2005) Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  5. Lecomber A (2017) Reshaping the project manager’s project story: an adoption study of ‘best practice’ project management. PhD, RMITGoogle Scholar
  6. Lecomber A, Tatnall A (2014) Project management for IT professionals: education and training issues. In: Passey D, Tatnall A (eds) Key competencies in ICT and informatics: implications and issues for educational professionals and management. IFIP Springer, PotsdamGoogle Scholar
  7. Ojiako U, Chipulu M, Marshall A, Ashleigh M, Williams T (2015) Project management learning: a comparative study between engineering students’ experiences in South Africa and the United Kingdom. Proj Manag J 46(4):47–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Sargeant R, Hatcher C, Trigunarsyah B, Coffey V, Kraatz JA (2010) Creating value in project management using PRINCE2. Office of Government Commerce, London. 2017, from http://eprints.qut.edu.au/52853/Google Scholar
  9. Tatnall A (2009) Innovation translation as a research approach to theorising information systems implementation. Int J Netw Virtual Organ 6(1):64–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Wells H (2012) How effective are project management methodologies? An explorative evaluation of their benefits in practice. Proj Manag J 43(6):43CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.See DifferentlyMalvern EastAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Bill Davey
    • 1
  1. 1.RMIT UniversityMelbourneAustralia