Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies

2020 Edition
| Editors: Arthur Tatnall

Educators and Children Perceiving Affordances with Working Technologies in Early Childhood Settings

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_127
  • 6 Downloads

Synonyms

Introduction

The range of digital technologies available in early childhood education (ECE) settings for children birth to 5 years has increased over the last decade. While somewhat limited literature exists across the ECE field, researchers have now begun to explore how children engage with technologies, rather than concentrate solely on the quantifying screen time exposure and impacts (Bird and Edwards 2015; Marsh et al. 2016). More specifically exploring how young children engage with provided technologies provided in ECE settings will increase the practitioner’s knowledge base and effectively promote children’s learning with technology devices. The types of technologies provided for children’s use are detailed below, along with professional learning, the perceived affordances with devices, how children respond to provided technologies, and a discussion on the effect of changing perceived affordances.

Working...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This PhD research was undertaken while the author was in receipt of an Australian Government RTP Scholarship. Thank you also to Dr. Sue Elliott and Dr. Marg Rogers who provided feedback on earlier drafts.

References

  1. Bird J (2017) Children’s responses to working and non-working technologies. In: Arnott L (ed) Digital technologies and learning in the early years. Sage, London, pp 101–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bird J (2019) “You need a phone and camera in your bag before you go out!”: children’s play with imaginative technologies. Br J Educ Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12791
  3. Bird J, Edwards S (2015) Children learning to use technologies through play: a digital play framework. Br J Educ Technol 46(6):1149–1160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blackwell CK, Lauricella AR, Wartella E (2014) Factors influencing digital technology use in early childhood education. Comput Educ 77(August):82–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Furman M, De Angelis S, Dominguez Prost E, Taylor I (2018) Tablets as an educational tool for enhancing preschool science. Int J Early Years Educ 27(1):1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2018.1439368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gibson JJ (1979) The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin CompanyGoogle Scholar
  7. Lafton T (2015) Digital literacy practices and pedagogical moments: human and non-human intertwining in early childhood education. Contemp Issues Early Child 16(2):142–152.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949115585657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Marsh J, Plowman L, Yamada-Rice D, Bishop J, Scott F (2016) Digital play: a new classification. Early Years 36(3):242–253.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2016.1167675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. O’Mara J, Laidlaw L (2011) Living in the iworld: two literacy researchers reflect on the changing texts and literacy practices of childhood. English Teaching: Practice & Critique 10(4):149–159Google Scholar
  10. Pols AJK (2012) Characterising affordances: The descriptions-of-affordances-model. Design Studies 33(2):113–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Reid-chassiakos Y, Radesky J, Christakis D, Moreno MA, Cross C, Hill D, … Swanson WS (2016) Children and adolescents and digital media. Pediatrics 138(5):e1–e18.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2016-2593
  12. Scott F (2018) Young children’s engagement with television and related media in the digital age. Sheffield, UK: University of SheffieldGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia