Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies

2020 Edition
| Editors: Arthur Tatnall

Digital Technologies and Literacy Contexts for Young Indigenous Children

  • Nicola YellandEmail author
  • Caja Gilbert
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10576-1_102
  • 10 Downloads

Synonyms

Introduction

Acknowledgment of the ways in which becoming literate empowers children and adults to function at high levels in everyday life and participate in active social futures has been internationally recognized for a long time (New London Group 1996). With this in mind, it is apparent that young children enjoy using new (digital) technologies, yet many school-based learning contexts seem to be ambivalent about using them for literacy learning. For example, Flewitt et al. ( 2015) note that:

Children’s immersion in digital communication occurs at a critical period in their lives when their emerging literacy skills (speaking, listening, reading and writing) and identities as effective and competent learners are being moulded by the conventions of the social and cultural worlds in which they live. (p. 291)

Accordingly, it becomes important to understand the ways...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Agostino JV et al (2016) Introducing iPad app into literacy instruction for struggling readers: teacher perceptions and student outcomes. J Early Child Lit 16(4):522–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2013) National report on schooling. ACARA, Canberra. http://www.acara.edu.au/_resources/ANR_2013_Parts_1-6_8_and_10.pdf. Accessed 21 Oct 2016
  3. Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) (2015) National assessment program in literacy and numeracy (NAPLAN). ACARA, Canberra. http://www.nap.edu.au/_resources/2015_NAPLAN_national_report.pdf. Accessed 21 Oct 2016
  4. Brady LM et al (2003) Community archaeology and oral tradition: commemorating and teaching cultural awareness on Mua Island, Torres Strait. Aust J Indig Educ 31:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burnett J (2015) Intellect, dream and action: story-telling in Steiner schools in New Zealand and the embedding of Indigenous narrative knowledge in education. Int Educ J Comp Perspect 14(2):43–50Google Scholar
  6. Deacon D, Pickering M, Golding P, Murdock G (1999) Research communications: a practical guide to methods in media and cultural analysis. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. DEECD (Department of Education and Early Childhood Development) (2006) Digital learning statement. Innovation and Next Practice Division, Melbourne. http://www.education.vic.gov.au/researchinnovation/digitallearning
  8. Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR) (2009) Belonging, being and becoming. The early years learning framework. Commonwealth of Australia, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  9. Flewitt R et al (2015) New directions for early literacy in a digital age: the iPad. J Early Child Lit 15(3):289–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frigo T et al (2004) Supporting English literacy for Indigenous students in the early years. ACER, Camberwell/VictoriaGoogle Scholar
  11. Fullan M, Langworthy M (2014) A rich seam: how new pedagogies find deep learning. https://michaelfullan.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/3897.Rich_Seam_web.pdf. Accessed 8 Dec 2017
  12. Goodman YM (2011) Sixty years of language arts education: looking back in order to look forward. Engl J 101(1):17–25MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. Hare J (2011) ‘They tell a story and there’s meaning behind that story’: Indigenous knowledge and young children’s literacy learning. J Early Child Lit 12(4): 389–414MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jewitt C (2003) Technology, literacy and learning. A multimodal approach. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Kalantzis M, Cope WW (2012) New learning: elements of a science of education, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, MelbourneCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kress G, Jewitt C (eds) (2003) Multimodal literacies. Peter Lang, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Lankshear C, Knobel M (2003) New literacies: changing knowledge and classroom learning. Open University Press, BuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  18. Layton L, Miller C (2004) Interpretations of literacy. Camb J Educ 34(1):51–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lynch J, Redpath T (2014) ‘Smart’ technologies in early years literacy education: a meta-narrative of paradigmatic tensions in iPad use in an Australian preparatory classroom. J Early Child Lit 14(2):147–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marsh J (2004) The techno-literacy practices of young children. J Early Child Res 2(1):51–66MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McKee LL, Heydon RM (2015) Orchestrating literacies: print literacy learning opportunities within multimodal intergenerational ensembles. J Early Child Lit 15(2): 227–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moll L, Amati C, Neff D, Gonzales N (1992) Funds of knowledge for teaching: using a qualitative approach to connects homes and classrooms. Theory Pract 31(2):132–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nakata M (2003) Some thoughts on literacy issues in Indigenous contexts. Aust J Indig Educ 31:7–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nakata M (2010) The cultural interface of Islander and scientific knowledge. Aust J Indig Educ 39:53–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. New London Group (1996) A pedagogy of multiliteracies. Harv Educ Rev 60(1):66–92Google Scholar
  26. NICHHD (National Institute of Child Health and Human Development) (2000) Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: an evidence- based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. NIH publication no. 00-4769. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  27. Plowman L et al (2010) Growing up with technology. Routledge, Abingdon, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Roberts J et al (2005) The role of home literacy practices in preschool children’s emergent literacy skills. J Speech Lang Hear Res 48(2):345–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rowan L, Honan E (2005) Literarily lost: the quest for quality literacy agendas in early childhood education. In: Yelland N (ed) Critical issues in early childhood education. Open University Press, BuckinghamGoogle Scholar
  30. Rowe DW, Miller ME (2016) Designing for diverse classrooms: using iPads and digital cameras to compose eBooks with emergent bilingual/biliterate four year olds. J Early Child Lit 16(4):425–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Senechal M et al (2006) The misunderstood giant: on the predictive role of early vocabulary to future reading. In: Long GE, Volk D (eds) Handbook of early literacy research, vol 2. Guildford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Struppert A, Guo Q, Waniganayake M (2010) Promoting intercultural competence through technology-based play. In: Ebbeck M, Waniganayake M (eds) Play in early childhood education. Oxford University Press, Melbourne, pp 270–287Google Scholar
  33. Trilling B, Fadel C (2009) 21st century skills: learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  34. UNESCO (2004) The plurality of literacy and its implications for policies and programmes. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  35. Vygotsky LS (1978) Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  36. Yelland NJ (2007) Shift to the future: rethinking learning with new technologies in education. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  37. Yelland NJ (2015) Young children as multimodal learners in the Information age. In: Renck Jalongo M, Heider KL (eds) Young children and families in the information age: applications of technology in early childhood. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 151–163Google Scholar
  38. Yelland NJ (2017) Teaching and learning with tablets: a case study of 21st century skills and new learning. In: Kucirkova N, Falloon G (eds) Apps, technology and young learners: international evidence for teaching. Routledge, London, pp 57–72Google Scholar
  39. Yelland NJ, Gilbert CL (2013) iPlay, iLearn, iGrow. A report for IBM. Victoria University, Melbourne. http://www.ipadsforeducation.vic.edu.au/userfiles/files/IBM%20Report%20iPlay,%20iLearn%20%26%20iGrow.pdfGoogle Scholar
  40. Yelland NJ, Gilbert CL (2014) SmartStart: creating new contexts for learning in the 21st century. A report for IBM. Victoria University, Melbourne. http://www.ipadsforeducation.vic.edu.au/userfiles/files/226543%20Vic%20Uni%20IBM%20Report%20Smart%20Start%202.pdfGoogle Scholar
  41. Yelland NJ, Gilbert CL (2016) SmartStart: pathways to new learning for Indigenous children. Report to IBM. http://www.education.vic.gov.au/school/teachers/support/Pages/learninaction.aspx

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Melbourne Graduate School of EducationThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.CSIROMelbourneAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Don Passey
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Technology Enhanced Learning, Department of Educational ResearchLancaster UniversityLancasterUK