Abstract
Proceeding from data about the geographical location of the world’s languages to producing a map of that geographical distribution is heavily dependent on the purpose for which the map is intended. This is illustrated with reference to the project World Atlas of Language Structures (WALS), which aims to represent the geographical distribution of the structural diversity of the world’s languages. This leads overall to a preference for representing languages by means of dots rather than polygons, even though this creates problems with languages spoken over a wide area or in a number of nonadjacent areas. This is illustrated with maps showing phonetic, syntactic, and lexical features, such as tone systems, the number of grammatical genders in a language, the order of verb and object in the sentence, and the presence versus absence of a lexical distinction between “hand” and “arm.” Possible research uses of the resulting maps are demonstrated by asking the question whether languages can come to resemble their neighbors as much as their relatives (i.e., other languages descended from the same common ancestor), using Mainland Southeast Asia as the test case, and concluding that areal influence resulting from language contact can indeed cause languages to resemble their neighbors in a significant number of respects.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Brown, C. H. (2013). Chapter 129 Hand and arm. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.). The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Comrie, B. (2007). Areal typology of mainland Southeast Asia: What we learn from the WALS maps. In P. Kullavanijaya (Ed.), Trends in Thai linguistics (= Manusya, Special Issue 13) (pp. 18–47). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. Online version. http://www.manusya.journals.chula.ac.th/files/essay/Comrie_18-47.pdf. Accessed 15 May 2018.
Comrie, B. (2008). The areal typology of Chinese: Between North and Southeast Asia. In R. Djamouri, B. Meisterernst, & R. Sybesma (Eds.), Chinese linguistics in Leipzig (pp. 1–21). Paris: École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, Centre de Recherches Linguistiques sur l’Asie Orientale.
Comrie, B., Dryer, M. S., Gil, D., & Haspelmath, M. (2013). Introduction. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.). The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Corbett, G. G. (2013). Chapter 30 Number of genders. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.). The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Dryer, M. S. (2013). Chapter 83 Order of object and verb. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.). The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Dryer, M. S., & Haspelmath, M. (Eds.). (2013). The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info. Accessed 15 May 2018.
Gil, D. (2013). Chapter 55 Numeral classifiers. In M. S. Dryer & M. Haspelmath (Eds.). The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Hammarström, H., Bank, S., Forkel, R., & Haspelmath, M. (2018). Glottolog 3.2. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. http://glottolog.org. Accessed 15 May 2018.
Haspelmath, M., Dryer, M. S., Comrie, B., & Gil, D. (Eds.). (2005). The world atlas of language structures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Maddieson, I. (2013). Chapter 13 Tone. In M. S. Dryer, & M. Haspelmath (Eds.). The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
Moroz, G. (2017). lingtypology: Easy mapping for Linguistic Typology. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lingtypology. Accessed 06 Feb 2019.
R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 6 Feb 2019.
Simons, G. F., & Fennig, C. D. (Eds.). (2018). Ethnologue: Languages of the world (21st ed.). Dallas: SIL International. http://www.ethnologue.com. Accessed 15 May 2018.
Publisher’s note:
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Comrie, B. (2020). Mapping the World’s Languages: From Data via Purpose to Representation. In: Brunn, S., Kehrein, R. (eds) Handbook of the Changing World Language Map. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02438-3_131
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02438-3_131
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02437-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02438-3
eBook Packages: Social SciencesReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences