Skip to main content

Balanced Scorecard

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management
  • 146 Accesses

Synonyms

Strategic scorecard

Definition

A balanced scorecard (BSC) is defined as a management system, a framework designed for performance measurement at a strategic level for an entire organization. This solution was proposed by a team of 12 business representatives led by Robert S. Kaplan and David N. Norton in 1992 (Kaplan and Norton 1992). In their seminal paper, Kaplan and Norton initially referred the BSC as a set of measures divided into four interrelated categories: customer, finance, internal business, and (organizational) innovation and learning. Each of these perspectives addresses questions for management to answer. Their aim was to help to develop objectives, measures (KPIs), targets, and initiatives from the perspective of the identified categories. The customer perspective as its name implies takes the clients’ viewpoint. The financial perspective includes a shareholders’ perception of the organization’s performance. The internal perspective focuses on processes which...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ax, C., & Bjørnenak, T. (2005). Bundling and diffusion of management accounting innovations – The case of the balanced scorecard in Sweden. Management Accounting Research, 16(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2004.12.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, A., Malleret, V., & Nørreklit, H. (2004). The American balanced scorecard versus the French tableau de bord: The ideological dimension. Management Accounting Research, 15(2), 107–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2003.12.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ćwiklicki, M. (2016). Comparison of public value measurement frameworks. ZarzÄ…dzanie Publiczne, 1(35), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.15678/ZP.2016.35.1.02.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edvinsson, L. (1997). Developing intellectual capital at Skandia. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 366–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(97)90248-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedag, H. R., & Schmidt, W. (2001). Balanced scorecard: Mehr als ein Kennzahlensystem (3rd ed.). Freiburg im Breisgau: Haufe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoque, Z. (2014). 20 Years of studies on the balanced scorecard: Trends, accomplishments, gaps and opportunities for future research. The British Accounting Review, 46(1), 33–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2013.10.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard – Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review. January–February, 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1993). Putting the balanced scorecard to work. Harvard Business Review, 71(5) (September–October),134–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996a). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996b). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 74(1) (January–February), 75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001). The strategy-focused organization: How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy maps converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrie, G., & Cobbold, I. (2004). Third-generation balanced scorecard: Evolution of an effective strategic control tool. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 53(7), 611–623. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410400410561231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meynhardt, T., Gomez, P., & Schweizer, M. (2014). The public value scorecard: What makes an organization valuable to society? Performance, 6(1), 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, M. H. (2003). The public value scorecard: A rejoinder and an alternative to “strategic performance measurement and management in non-profit organizations” by Robert Kaplan (no. 18). Cambridge, MA: Hauser Center for Nonprofit Organizations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morisawa, T. (2002). Building performance measurement systems with the balanced scorecard approach. NRI papers, 45. Retrieved from http://members.home.nl/j.s.sterk/AQM/BuildingPerformanceMeasurementSystemswiththeBalancedScorecardApproach.pdf

  • Niven, P. R. (2008). Balanced scorecard step-by-step for government and nonprofit agencies (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nørreklit, H., Kure, N., & Trenca, M. (2018). Balanced scorecard. In R. L. Heath & W. Johansen (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of strategic communication (1st ed.). Boston: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119010722.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (2011). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding cultural diversity in business (2nd ed.). London: Brealey.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marek Ćwiklicki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Ćwiklicki, M. (2021). Balanced Scorecard. In: Idowu, S., Schmidpeter, R., Capaldi, N., Zu, L., Del Baldo, M., Abreu, R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Sustainable Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02006-4_378-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02006-4_378-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-02006-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-02006-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Business and ManagementReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics