Skip to main content

Identity Construction Amidst the Forces of Domination

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Theory and Research in Cultural Studies and Education

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

  • 90 Accesses

Abstract

Dominant group hegemony, and the discourses it generates, preserves its own privilege by carving its perspective and will into the minds of young people over time as powerful waves shape coastlines. This has particular consequences for those gendered as male and racialized as black. The negotiation of black masculinities, especially for those black males who are non-heteronormal, becomes a struggle against exclusion and resistance and being located at the bottom of a socioeconomic hierarchy determined by hegemonic masculinity. Caught between conceptual hegemony that streams the dominant’s discourses of hierarchical stratification through countless images, media, advertising, historical accounts, schooling, and society’s interminable dominant group messaging and the message itself of hegemonic masculinity, black masculinities are challenged with forces that threaten exclusion, dropout, trauma, and imprisonment. Whether or not this constant stream of indoctrination can be absorbed or resisted in a way that does not obliterate genuine being or necessarily require that black masculinities be relegated to the lowest levels of society is uncertain. Yet, some scholars posit that resilient self-conceptions can be scaffolded through interventions born of a critical race conceptual framework, which focuses on identity construction and which can improve self-conception and, through that, academic achievement as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Carter, D. J. (2007). Why the Black kids sit together at the stairs: The role of identity-affirming counter-space in a predominantly White high school. The Journal of Negro Education,76(4), 542–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, P. H. (2006). A telling difference: Dominance, strength and black masculinities. In A. D. Mutua (Ed.), Progressive black masculinities (pp. 73–97). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Chap 3. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordes, C., & Miller, E. (Eds.) (2000). Fool’s gold: A critical look at computers in childhood. Retrieved 19 Sept 2006 from Alliance for Childhood website at http://www.allianceforchildhood.net/projects/computers/computers_reports_fools_gold_contents.htm

  • Cummins, J., Brown, K., & Sayers, D. (2006). Literacy, technology, and diversity: Teaching for success in changing times. Pearson: Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dance, L. J. (2002). Tough fronts: The impact of street culture on schooling. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dei, G. (1996). Anti-racism education: Theory and practice. Halifax: Fernwood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dei, G. J. S. (2000). Removing the margins: The challenges and possibilities of inclusive schooling. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dei, G., Mazzuca, J., McIsaac, E., & Zine, J. (1997). Reconstructing ‘drop-out’: A critical ethnography of the dynamics of black student’s disengagement from school. Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2005). The Derrick Bell reader. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, A. (2000). Bad boys: Public schools in the making of Black masculinity. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gaskew, T. (2015). Developing a prison education pedagogy. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2015(170), 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, D. (1993). Racist culture (pp. 1–84). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchett, B. F., Black, L., & Holmes, K. (1999). Effects of citizenship inequalities on the black male. Challenge: A Journal of Research on Africa;i American Mcii, 10(2), 65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooks, B. (2003). Teaching community: A pedagogy of hope. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, C. E. (2005). Race in play: Understanding the socio-cultural worlds of student athletes. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, C. (2009). Masculinity, racialization, and schooling. In W. Martino, M. Kehler, & W. B. Weaver-Hightower (Eds.), The problem with boys education (pp. 102–123). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwan-Lafond, D. (2012). Racialized masculinities in Canada. In J. A. Laker (Ed.), Men & masculinities: An interdisciplinary reader (pp. 222–240). Ontario: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, M. (2005). Critical race theory, afrocentricity, and their relationship to critical pedagogy. In Z. Leonardo (Ed.), Critical pedagogy and race (pp. 127–139). Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majors, R. (1990). Cool pose: Black masculinity and sports. In M. A. Messner & D. F. Sabo (Eds.), Sport, men, and the gender order: Critical feminist perspectives (pp. 109–114). Champaign: Human Kinetics Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Majors, R., & Billson, J. M. (1992). Cool pose: The dilemmas of black manhood on America. New York: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noguera, P. A. (2003a). The trouble with black boys: The role and influence of environmental and cultural factors on the academic performance of African American males. Urban Education, 38(4), 431–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noguera, P. A. (2003b). Joaquin’s dilemma: Understanding the link between racial identity and school-related behaviors. In M. Sadowski (Ed.), Adolescents at school: Perspectives on youth, identity, and education (pp. 19–308). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odih, P. (2002). Masculinities and role models: Masculinity and the educational “underachievement” of young Afro-Caribbean males. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 5(1), 91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C. (2011). Young children making sense of racial and ethnic differences: A sociocultural approach. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 387. AERA.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santrock, J. W. (2001). Adolescence (p. 15). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J. (2014). High school equivalency as counter-space. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2014(144), 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solorzano, D., Ceja, M., & Yosso, T. (2000). Critical race theory, racial microaggressions, and campus racial climate: The experiences of African-American college students. The Journal of Negro Education, 69(1/2), 60–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C., & Schwartz, P. J. (2014). A new normal: Young men of color, trauma, and engagement in learning. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2014(144), 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terry Louisy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Louisy, T. (2019). Identity Construction Amidst the Forces of Domination. In: Trifonas, P. (eds) Handbook of Theory and Research in Cultural Studies and Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01426-1_49-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01426-1_49-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01426-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01426-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics