Skip to main content

The Politics of Seeing

Art and the Violence of Aesthetics

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Theory and Research in Cultural Studies and Education

Abstract

The measure of art is the ability to induce modes of sensibility that create new forms of intelligibility. In Les Desmoiselles d’Avignon and Guernica, Pablo Picasso enables the viewer to see what was not there before and in a different way. The paintings politicize aesthetic acts as moments of a questioning and reflection on subjectivity toward an emancipation of the image from past experience. Art no longer becomes a witness signifying the timeless truths of life, but is a battleground triggering nostalgia and disillusionment mourning the loss of meaning. The politics of seeing depends on the violence of aesthetics. That is, the extent to which artistic regimes impact the production of what is knowable and what is visible are reproduced and resisted in a work of art.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arnheim, R. (1954). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnheim, R. (1962). Picasso’s Guernica. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barthes, R. (1964). Image—Music—Text. New York: Hill & Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chave, A. C. (1994). New encounters with Les Demoiselles d’Avignon: Gender, race and the origins of cubism. The Art Bulletin, 76(4), 596–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1987). The truth in painting (trans: Bennington, G., & McLeod, I.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florman, L. (2012). Insistent, resistant Cézanne: On Picasso’s “Three Women” and ‘Les Demoiselles D’avignon’. Source: Notes in the History of Art, 31/32(4/1), 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janson, H. W., & Janson, A. F. (1997). History of art. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krampen, M. (1973). Iconic signs, supersigns and models. Versus, 4, 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noth, W. (1985). Handbook of semiotics. Indiana: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (2004). The politics of aesthetics (trans: Rockhil, G.). Great Britain: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Martin, F. (1990). Semiotics of visual language. Indiana: University of Indiana Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthi Trifonas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Trifonas, A., Trifonas, P.P. (2020). The Politics of Seeing. In: Trifonas, P. (eds) Handbook of Theory and Research in Cultural Studies and Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01426-1_40-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01426-1_40-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-01426-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-01426-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics