Advertisement

Natural Resource Flows and Sustainability in Urban Areas

  • Stefan Anderberg
Reference work entry
  • 448 Downloads
Part of the Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology Series book series (ESSTS)

Glossary

Ecological footprint

A measure of the resource consumption of a given unit (e.g., a city and its population) that represents the area of ecologically productive land and water needed for the production and assimilation of wastes generated.

Emergy analysis

Emergy is the amount of energy, usually solar, that is directly or indirectly required to generate a given output flow. Emergy analysis allows analysis of the whole embodied environmental work expressed in a single unit and has been applied to flows in cities and other regions as well as different types of products and production processes.

Urban ecology

Research on urban ecosystems and applications of ecological principles in connection with urban planning.

Urban metabolism

Involves conceptualizing a city as an organism or ecosystem and tracking resources that go into the system and products and wastes that leave it.

Urban mining

Recovery of metals and other valuable materials in urban areas. Studies that have identified...

Bibliography

Primary Literature

  1. 1.
    UNFPA (2007) State of world population 2007. Unleashing the potential of urban growth. United Nations Population Fund, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu J, Bai X, Briggs JM (2008) Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319:756–760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Huang SL, Yeh CT, Chang LF (2010) The transition to an urbanizing world and the demand for natural resources. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2:136–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ravetz J (2000) Integrated assessment for sustainability appraisal in cities and regions. Environ Impact Assess Rev 20:31–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rotmans J, van Asselt MBA, Vellinga P (2000) An integrated framework for sustainable cities. Environ Impact Assess Rev 20:265–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Alberti M (1996) Measuring urban sustainability. Environ Impact Assess Rev 16(4–6):381–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Newman PWG (1999) Sustainability and cities: extending the metabolism model. Landsc Urban Plan 44:219–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Batty M (2008) The size, scale, and shape of cities. Science 319:769–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luckin B, Massard-Guilbaud G, Schott D (eds) (2005) Environment and the City. Modern European cities and the management of their resources. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Douglas I, Hodgson R, Lawson N (2002) Industry, environment and health through 200 years in Manchester. Ecol Econ 41(2):235–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Keiner M, Koll-Schretzenmayr M, Schmid WA (2005) Managing urban futures: sustainability and urban growth in developing countries. Ashgate Publishers, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ooi GL (2009) Challenges of sustainability for Asian urbanization. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2009(1):187–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Agudelo-Vera CM, Mels AR, Keesman KJ, Rijnaarts HH (2011) Resource management as a key factor for sustainable urban planning. J Environ Manag 92:2295–2303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Roseland M (2005) Toward sustainable communities: resources for citizens and their governments. New Society, Gabriola IslandGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Newman P, Jennings I (2008) Cities as sustainable ecosystems: principles and practices. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Girardet H (1999) Creating sustainable cities. Green Books/The Schumacher Society, TotnesGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Register R (2006) Ecocities: rebuilding cities in balance with nature. New Society, Gabriola IslandGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McIntyre NE, Knowles-Yánez K, Hope M (2008) Urban ecology as an interdisciplinary field: differences in the use of “Urban” between the social and natural sciences. In: Marzluff JM (ed) Urban ecology. An international perspective on the interaction between humans and nature. Springer, New york, pp 49–65Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM, Boone CG, Groffman PM, Irwin E, Kaushal SS, Marshall V, McGrath BP, Nilon CH, Pouyat RV, Szlavecz K, Troy A, Warren P (2011) Urban ecological systems: scientific foundations and a decade of progress. J Environ Manag 92:331–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hultman J (1993) Approaches and methods in urban ecology. Geograf Ann Ser B Hum Geogr 75(1):41–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    McGranahan G, Marcotullio P, Bai X, Balk D, Braga T, Douglas I, Elmqvist T, Rees W, Satterthwaite D, Songsore J, Zlotnick H, Eades J, Ezcurra E, Whyte A (2005) Urban systems. In: Millennium ecosystem assessment: conditions and trends assessment. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Duvigneaud P, Denayeyer-De Smet S (1977) L’Ecosystéme Urbs, in L’Ecosystéme Urbain Bruxellois. In: Duvigneaud P, Kestemont P (eds) Productivité en Belgique. Traveaux de la Section Belge du Programme Biologique International. Bruxelles, pp 581–597Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wolman A (1965) The metabolism of cities. Sci Am 213: 179–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kennedy CA, Cuddihy J, Engel Yan J (2007) The changing metabolism of cities. J Ind Ecol 11(2):43–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ayres RU, Simonis UK (eds) (1994) Industrial metabolism. United Nations University Press, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kennedy C et al (2011) The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning and design. Environ Pollut 159:1965–1973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bergbäck B, Johansson K, Mohlander U (2001) Urban metal flows – a case study of Stockholm, review and conclusions. Water Air Soil Pollut Focus 1(3/4):3–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Barles S (2007) Feeding the city: food consumption and flow of nitrogen, Paris, 1801–1914. Sci Total Environ 375:48–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Browne D, O’Regan B, Moles R (2009) Assessment of total urban metabolism and metabolic inefficiency in an Irish city-region. Waste Manag 29(10):2765–2771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Zucchetto J (1975) Energy, economic theory and mathematical models for combining the systems of man and nature. Case study, the urban region of Miami. Ecol Model 1:241–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Huang SL, Hsu WL (2003) Materials flow analysis and energy evaluation of Taipei’s urban construction. Landsc Urban Plan 63(2):61–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Zhang Y, Yang Z, Yu X (2009) Evaluation of urban metabolism based on energy synthesis: a case study for Beijing. Ecol Model 220(13–14):1690–1696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ascione M, Campanella L, Cherubini F, Ulgiati S (2009) Environmental driving forces of urban growth and development. An emergy-based assessment of the city of Rome, Italy. Landsc Urban Plan 93:238–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wackernagel M, Kitzes J, Moran D, Goldfinger S, Thomas M (2006) The ecological footprint of cities and regions: comparing resource availability with resource demand. Environ Urban 18(1):103–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wackernagel M, Rees W (1995) Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth. New Society, Gabriola IslandGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wackernagel M (1998) The ecological footprint of Santiago de Chile. Local Environ 3(1):7–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Folke C, Jansson Å, Larsson J, Costanza R (1997) Ecosystem appropriation by cities. Ambio 26:167–172Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Barrett J, Vallack H, Jones A, Haq G (2002) A material flow analysis and ecological footprint of York. Technical report. Stockholm Environment Institute, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Collins A, Flynn A, Weidmann T, Barrett J (2006) The environmental impacts of consumption at a subnational level: the ecological footprint of Cardiff. J Ind Ecol 10(3):9–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chartered Institute of Wastes Management (2002) A resource flow and ecological footprint analysis of greater London. Best Foot Forward, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Eaton RL, Hammond GP, Laurie J (2007) Footprints on the landscape: an environmental appraisal of urban and rural living in the developed world. Landsc Urban Plan 83:13–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Niza S, Rosado L, Ferrão P (2009) Urban metabolism: methodological advances in urban material flow accounting based on the Lisbon case. J Ind Ecol 13(3):384–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schulz NB (2007) The direct material inputs into Singapore’s development. J Ind Ecol 11(2):117–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sörme L, Bergbäck B, Lohm U (2001) Century perspective of heavy metal use in urban areas. A case study in Stockholm. J Water Air Soil Pollut Focus 1(3–4):197–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Svidén J, Jonsson A (2001) Urban metabolism of mercury turnover, emissions and stock in Stockholm 1795–1995. J Water Air Soil Pollut Focus 1(3–4):79–196Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Brunner PH, Rechberger H (2004) Practical handbook of material flow analysis. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Obernosterer R, Brunner PH (2001) Urban metal management the example of lead. J Water Air Soil Pollut Focus 1(3–4): 241–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Baker LA, Hope D, Xu Y, Edmonds J, Lauver L (2001) Nitrogen balance for the Central Arizona Phoenix (CAP) ecosystem. Ecosystems 4:582–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Færge J, Magid J, Penning de Vries FWT (2001) Urban nutrient balance for Bangkok. Ecol Model 139:63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Forkes J (2007) Nitrogen balance for the urban food metabolism of Toronto Canada. Resour Conserv Recycl 52:74–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Neset TSS, Lohm U (2005) Spatial imprint of food consumption. A historical analysis for Sweden, 1870–2000. Hum Ecol 33(4):565–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hermanowicz SW, Asano T (1999) Abel Wolman’s the metabolism of cities’ revisited: a case for water recycling. Water Sci Technol 40(4):29–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gandy M (2004) Rethinking urban metabolism: water, space and the modern city. City 8(3):363–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Thériault J, Laroche AM (2009) Evaluation of the urban hydrologic metabolism of the Greater Moncton region, New Brunswick. Can Water Resour J 34(3):255–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Sahely HR, Kennedy CA (2007) Integrated systems flow model for quantifying environmental and economic sustain-ability indicators: case study of the City of Toronto urban water system. ASCE J Water Resour Plann Manage 133(6):550–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Baker LA (ed) (2009) The water environment of cities. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kennedy C, Steinberger J, Gasson B, Hillman T, Havránek M, Hansen Y, Pataki D, Phdungsilp A, Ramaswami A, Villalba Mendez G (2009) Greenhouse gas emissions from global cities. Environ Sci Technol 43:7297–7302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Fischer-Kowalski M, Krausmann F, Smetschka B (2004) Modelling scenarios of transport across history from a socio-metabolic perspective. Rev – Fernand Braudel Center 27:307–342Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Bettencourt L, Lobo J, Helbing D, Kuhnert C, West GB (2007) Growth innovation scaling and the pace of life in cities. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:7301–7306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    SUME (Sustainable Urban Metabolism for Europe) FP7 Collaborative Research Project. http://www.sume.at. Accessed 1 July 2011
  61. 61.
    BRIDGE programme (sustainaBle uRban plannIng Decision support accountinG for urban mEtabolism). http://www.bridge-fp7.eu. Accessed 1 July 2011
  62. 62.
    Baccini P, Bader HP (1996) Regionaler Stoffhaushalt. Spektrum Akad. Verlag, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Cencic O, Rechberger H (2008) Material flow analysis with software STAN. J Environ Eng Manage 18(1):3–7Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Oswald F, Baccini P (2003) Netzstadt: designing the urban. Birkhäuser, BaselGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Newcombe K, Kalma J, Aston A (1978) The metabolism of a city: the case of Hong Kong. Ambio 7:3–15Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Boyden S, Millar S, Newcombe K, O’Neill B (1981) The ecology of a city and its people: the case of Hong Kong. Australian National University Press, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Warren-Rhodes K, Koenig A (2001) Escalating trends in the urban metabolism of Hong Kong: 1971–1997. Ambio 30(7):429–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Bai X (2007) Integrating global environmental concerns into urban management – the scale and readiness arguments. J Ind Ecol 2(11):15–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Anderberg S, Clark E (2011) The green and sustainable Øresund region: eco-branding Copenhagen and Malmö. In: Vojnovic I (ed) Sustainability: a global urban context. Michigan State University Press, Lansing. (in press)Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Redkin A. Portland again tops a sustainable cities list, dot earth, the opinion pages, New York Times. http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com. Accessed 22 June 2011
  71. 71.
    Sustainable Business Oregon Portland’s traffic is 16th worst. http://www.sustainablebusinessoregon.com. Accessed 22 June 2011
  72. 72.
    Tratalos J, Fuller R, Warrren P, Davies R, Gaston K (2007) Urban form, biodiversity potential and ecosystem services. Landsc Urban Plan 83:308–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Geurs KT, van Wee B (2006) Ex-post evaluation of thirty years of compact urban development in the Netherlands. Urban Stud 43(1):139–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Jenks M, Burton E, Williams K (eds) (2000) The compact city: a sustainable urban form? Oxford Brookes University, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Halbert L, Pain K, Thierstein A (2006) European polycentricity and emerging Mega-City-Regions – “one size fits all” policy? Built Environ 32(2):194–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    European Commission (1999) European spatial development perspective. Towards balanced and sustainable development of the territory of the European UnionGoogle Scholar

Books and Reviews

  1. Anderberg S, Prieler S, Olendrzynski K, de Bruyn S (2000) Old sins – industrial metabolism, heavy metal pollution and environmental transition in Central Europe. UN University Press, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  2. Baccini P, Brunner PH (1991) Metabolism of the anthroposphere. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernhardt C (ed) (2004) Environmental problems in European cities in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Waxmann, Münster\New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Odum HT (1996) Environmental accounting: emergy and environmental policy making. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Tarr JA (2002) The metabolism of the industrial city: the case of Pittsburgh. J Urban Hist 28(5):511–545CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Anderberg
    • 1
  1. 1.Lund University Centre for Sustainability StudiesLund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations