Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology

Living Edition
| Editors: Robert A. Meyers

Gas to Liquid Technologies

  • Marianna AsaroEmail author
  • Ronald M. Smith
  • Burtron H. Davis
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2493-6_72-3

Glossary

Autothermal reforming (ATR)

The reaction of oxygen and carbon dioxide or steam with methane to form synthesis gas, wherein the exothermic partial oxidation of methane provides energy for the endothermic steam reforming of methane. ATR is also used in reference to the autothermal reformer itself.

BOE

Barrel of oil equivalent

Btu

Also btu, British thermal unit, a measure of energy content

bbl

Barrels (of oil)

Catalytic membrane reactor (CMR)

A flow-through reactor used to influence an equilibrium-limited reaction to proceed further in the forward direction via selective transport of reactant(s) or product(s) across the membrane

CPOx

Catalytic partial oxidation

CTL

Coal-to-liquids

DME

Dimethylether

DOE

United States Department of Energy

Fischer-Tropsch reaction

The catalytic conversion of synthesis gas to primarily hydrocarbons, the discovery being credited to Franz Fischer and Hans Tropsch

Gas heated reforming (GHR)

Use of heat available by recycling process gas (tail gas)...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    Crane H, Kinderman E, Malhotra R (2010) A cubic mile of oil. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    United States Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Compilation of emission factors AP-42, v1, 5th edn, supplement DGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    United States Environmental Protection Agency (2010) Compilation of Emission factors AP-42, vl 1, 5th edn, supplement E, corrected. Calculation for low-sulfur No. 6 fuel oilGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    United States Environmental Protection Agency (1998) Compilation of emission factors AP-42, v1, 5th edn, supplement E. Calculation for medium volatile bituminous coalGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rajnauth J, Ayeni K, Barrufet M (2008) Gas transportation: present and future. In: CIPC/SPE gas technology symposium 2008 joint conference, Calgary, 16–19 JuneGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bellussi G, Zennaro R. New developments: energy, transport, sustainability. In: Encyclopaedia of hydrocarbons, vol III, Ch 2.6, pp 161–182, EniChemGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smith R, Asaro M, Naqvi S (2008) Fuels of the future: technology intelligence for coal to liquids strategies. Process Economics Program, SRI Consulting, Menlo ParkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yost C, DiNapoli R (2003) Benchmarking study compares LNG plant costs. Oil Gas J 101(15):56–59Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nielsen R (2001) Fundamentals of mixed refrigerant compared to conventional refrigeration are discussed in “Ethylene Plant Enhancement”. PEP report 29G, SRI Consulting, Menlo ParkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Low WR, Andress D, Houser C (1997) Method of load distribution in a cascaded refrigeration process. US 5611216 to Phillips Petroleum CompanyGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Houser C, Yao J, Andress D, Low WR (1997) Efficiency improvement of open-cycle cascaded refrigeration process. US 5669234 to Phillips Petroleum CompanyGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Delong BW (1987) Method for cooling normally gaseous material. US 4680041 to Phillips Petroleum CompanyGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Netzer D, Nielsen R (2003) Baseload liquefied natural gas by Cascade refrigeration. PEP review 2003-15. SRI Consulting, Menlo ParkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Huffman GP, Feeley III TJ (2000) Fuel science in the year 2000: where do we stand, where do we go from here? I: power generation and related environmental concerns – DOE’s fine particulate and air toxics research program: responding to the environmental challenges to coal-based power production in the 21st century. Preprints of the Division of Fuel Chemistry of the American Chemical Society 45(1):108–112. 2000 Spring conference of the American Chemical Society, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reprinted from Hydrocarbon Engineering (2006) Topsoe_synthesis_g#6D6FFA1.ashx.pdf. Accessed 2 Apr 2011Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Christensen TS, Østberg M, Bak Hansen J-H (2001) Process demonstration of autothermal reforming at low steam-to-carbon ratios for production of synthesis gas. In: AIChE annual meeting, Reno, 4–9 NovGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wesenberg MH (2006) Gas heated steam reformer modelling. PhD thesisGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Aasberg-Petersen K, Thomas S, Christensen TS, Charlotte Stub Nielsen CS, Dybkjær I (2003) Recent developments in autothermal reforming and pre-reforming for synthesis gas production in GTL applications. Fuel Process Technol 83(1–3):253–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Loock S, Ernst WS, Thomsen SG, Jensen MF (2005) Improving carbon efficiency in an auto-thermal methane reforming plant with gas heated heat exchange reforming technology. Paper no. O96-001, 7th World congress of chemical engineering, GlasgowGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tsuru T, Yamaguchi K, Yoshioka T, Asaeda M (2004) Methane steam reforming by microporous catalytic membrane reactors. AICHE J 50(11):2794–2805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Carolan MF, Chen CM, Rynders SW (2003) Development of the ceramic membrane ITM syngas/ITM hydrogen process. Fuel Chem Div Preprints 48(1):344Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Repasky J, McCarthy D, Armstrong P, Carolan M (2014) ITM technology for carbon capture on natural gas and hybrid power systems. In: Workshop on technology pathways forward for carbon capture & storage on natural gas power systems, Washington, DC, 22 Apr 2014Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Robinson ET (S), Sirman J, Apte P, Gui X, Bulicz T R, Corgard D, Hemmings J (2005) Development of OTM syngas process and testing of syngas derived ultra-clean fuels in diesel engines and fuel cells. DE-FC26-01NT41096, final reportGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Caro J, Wang H, Noack M, Koelsch P, Kapteijn F, Kannelopolous N, Nolan J (Oct. 2007) Manufacture of composite membranes and their use for selective partial oxidation reactions of hydrocarbons. EP 1847311 to Universität HannoverGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dupont V, Ross AB, Knight E, Hanky I, Twigg MV (2008) Production of hydrogen by unmixed steam reforming of methane. Chem Eng Sci 63(11):2966–2979CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Li J (2015) Praxair’s oxygen transport membrane. In: Technology for syngas and power applications, DOE/NETL carbon capture meeting, Pittsburgh, 26 June 2015Google Scholar
  27. 27.
  28. 28.
    Davis BH (2001) Fischer-Tropsch synthesis: current mechanism and futuristic needs. Fuel Process Technol 71:157–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Robert C, Brady RC III, Pettit R (1981) Mechanism of the Fischer-Tropsch reaction. The chain propagation step. J Am Chem Soc 1981:287–1289Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Oukaci R, Singleton AH, Goodwin JG Jr (1999) Comparison of patented Co F–T catalysts using fixed-bed and slurry bubble column reactors. Appl Catal A Gen 186:129–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Manzer L, Schwarz S (2002) Fischer-Tropsch processes using catalysts on mesoporous supports. US 2002052289 to ConocoGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Godorr S (2011) GTL technology advancements. In: World petroleum conferenceGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Das TK, Zhan X, Li J, Jacobs G, Dry ME, Davis BH (2007) Ffischer-Tropsch synthesis: kinetics and effect of water for a Co-Al2O3 catalsyt, Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, catalsyts and catalysis (B.H. Davis, M.L. Occelli, eds.) Stud Surf Sci 163:289–314Google Scholar
  34. 34.
  35. 35.
    Spath PL, Dayton DC (2003) Preliminary screening – technical and economic assessment of synthesis gas to fuels and chemicals with emphasis on the potential for biomass-derived syngas. NREL/TP-510-34929Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fisher IA, Bell AT (1998) In situ infrared study of methanol synthesis from H2/CO over Cu/SiO2 and Cu/ZrO2/SiO2. J Catal 178(1):153–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Chinchen GC, Denny PJ, Parker DG, Spencer MS, Whan DA (1987) Mechanism of methanol synthesis from CO2/CO/H2 mixtures over copper/zinc oxide/alumina catalysts: use of 14C-labelled reactants. Appl Catal 30(2):333–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Grabow LC, Mavrikakis M (2011) Mechanism of methanol synthesis on cu through CO2 and CO hydrogenation. ACS Catal 1(4):365–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tijm PJA, Waller FJ, Brown DM (2001) Methanol technology developments for the new millennium. Appl Catal A Gen 221:275–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Liu J, Wei R, Zhang Y, Xu R, Li Z (2009) Preparation of Cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalysts for methanol synthesis by improved two-step coprecipitation method. Gongye Cuihua 17(7):22–25, C.A. 2009:1625358Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Baltes C, Vukojevic S, Schüth F (2008) Correlations between synthesis, precursor, and catalyst structure and activity of a large set of CuO/ZnO/Al2O3 catalysts for methanol synthesis. J Catal 258(2):334–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Kaluza S, Behrens M, Schiefenhoevel N, Kniep B, Fischer R, Schloegl R, Muhler M (2011) A novel synthesis route for cu/ZnO/Al2O3 catalysts used in methanol synthesis: combining continuous consecutive precipitation with continuous aging of the precipitate. ChemCatChem 3(1):189–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lurgi brochure 0312e_MegaMethanol.pdfGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Smith R, Naqvi S, Asaro M (2008) Fuels of the future: technology intelligence for coal to liquids strategies. SRI Consulting, Menlo ParkGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lewnard JJ, Hsuing TH, White JF, Brown DM (1990) Single-step synthesis of dimethyl ether in a slurry reactor. Chem Eng Sci 45(8):2735–2741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Ohno Y, Yagi H, Inou N (2007) Slurry phase DME synthesis technology: 100 ton/day demonstration plant operation and scale-up study. Stud Surf Sci Catal 167:403–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Haugaard J, Voss B (2001) Process for the synthesis of a methanol/dimethyl ether mixture from synthesis gas. US 6191175 to Haldor TopsøeGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Naqvi S (2002) Dimethyl ether as alternative. Fuel PEP report 245. SRI Consulting, Menlo ParkGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kang S-H, Bae JW, Kim H-S, Dhar GM, Jun K-W (2010) Enhanced catalytic performance for dimethyl ether synthesis from syngas with the addition of Zr or Ga on a Cu−ZnO−Al2O3/γ-Al2O3 bifunctional catalyst. Energy Fuel 24(2):804–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Bhatt B L, Schaub E, Heydorn E (1993) Recent developments in slurry reactor technology at the LaPorte alternative fuels development unit. In: International technical conference on coal utilization & fuel systems, 26–29 Apr, pp 197–208Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Peng X-D, Toseland B, Underwood T (1997) A novel mechanism of catalyst deactivation in liquid phase synthesis gas-to-DME reactions. In: Bartholomew C, Fuentes GH (eds) Catalyst deactivation, vol 111. Elsevier, pp 175–182Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Peng X-D (2002) Catalyst activity maintenance for the liquid phase synthesis gas-to-dimethyl ether process. Part II: development of Aluminum phosphate as the dehydration catalyst for the single-step liquid phase syngas-to-DME process. DOE contract DE-FC22-94PC93052, final reportGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Peng X-D (2002) Kinetic understanding of the syngas -to-DME reaction system and its implications to process and economics. DOE contract DE-FC22-94 PC93052, topical reportGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Tijm P J (2003) Development of alternative fuels and chemicals from synthesis gas. DOE contract number FC22-95PC93052, final reportGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Smith R (September 2009) Dimethyl ether (DME) from coal. PEP report 245B. SRI Consulting, Menlo ParkGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Ogawa T, Inoue N, Shikada T, Ohno Y (2003) Direct dimethyl ether synthesis. J Nat Gas Chem 12:219–227Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    The Ministry of Industry, Energy and Tourism; Orkustofnun/The National Energy Authority, The Innovation Center Iceland; Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.; Mitsubishi Corporation; Hekla hf.; NordicBlueEnergy (2010) A feasibility study report for a DME project in Iceland. IDME Project Feasibility Study – 2009. Accessed 4 Apr 2011Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Pavone T (2003) Jumbo dimethyl ether production process via Toyo technology. PEP review 2003-9. SRI Consulting, Menlo ParkGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
  60. 60.
    Prabowo B, Yan M, Wyamiro M, Setyobudi RH, Biddinika MK (2017) State of the art of global dimethyl ether production and its potential application in Indonesia. Proc Pakistan Acad Sci B Life Environ Sci 54:29–39Google Scholar
  61. 61.
  62. 62.
  63. 63.
    Apanel G (1999) Liquid hydrocarbons from synthesis gas. PEP report 191A. SRI Consulting, Menlo ParkGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Tabak SA, Yurchak S (1990) Conversion of methanol over ZSM-5 to fuels and chemicals. Catal Today 6(3):307–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Methanax Corportion (2015) Annual information form, 9 March 2015Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Jennings JR (2010) Catalytic ammonia synthesis: fundamentals and practice. Barnes & NobleGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Spath P, Dayton D (2003) Bioproducts from syngas. Syngas_products.pdf. Accessed 2 Apr 2011Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry (2002) “Ammonia” published online 15 Dec 2006. doi: 10.1002/14356007.a02_143.pub2. Accessed 4 Apr 2011
  69. 69.
    Shah J (2007) SAFCO IV: catalyst start-ups in the world’s largest ammonia plant. 20th AFA international annual technical conference, Tunisia, 5_03 John_BRIGHTLING_ Johnson Matthey Catalysts_U.K.pdf. Accessed 4 Apr 2011Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Liu H (2013) Ammonia synthesis catalysts: innovation and practice. Barnes & NobleGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Xu X, Fu G, Goddard III WA, Periana RA (2004) “Selective oxidation of CH4 to CH3OH using the Catalytica (bpym)PtCl2 catalyst: a theoretical study” in Studies in surface science and catalysis, natural gas conversion VII. In: Proceedings of the 7th natural gas conversion symposium, pp 147, 499–504Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Kalamaras C, Palomas D, Bos R, Horton A, Crimmin M, Hellgardt K (2016) Selective oxidation of methane to methanol over Cu- and Fe-exchanged zeolites: the effect of Si/Al molar ratio. Catal Lett 146:483–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Narsimhan K, Iyoki K, Dinh K, Roman-Leshkov Y (2016) Catalytic oxidation of methane into methanol over copper-exchanged zeolites with oxygen at low temperature. ACS Central Sci 2:424–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Xu J, Armstrong RD, Shaw G, Dummer NF, Freakley SJ, Taylor SH, Hutchings GJ (2016) Continuous selective oxidation of methane to methanol over Cu-and Fe-modified-ZSM-5 catalysts in a flow reactor. Catal Today 270:93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Zennaro R, Hugues F, Caprani E (2006) The Eni – IFP/Axens GTL technology: from R&D to a successful scale-up. In: DGMK – SCI conference on synthesis gas chemistry, DresdenGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marianna Asaro
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ronald M. Smith
    • 2
  • Burtron H. Davis
    • 3
  1. 1.SRI InternationalMenlo ParkUSA
  2. 2.SRI ConsultingMenlo ParkUSA
  3. 3.Center for Applied Energy ResearchUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA