Skip to main content

Sustainable Design and Construction, Integrated Delivery Processes and Building Information Modeling

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology

Glossary

BIM model:

A three-dimensional digital simulation, typically of a building or other built form, which is both parametric and database-driven.

Building information modeling (BIM):

The methodology or process of creating a parametric database-driven digital model of a building or built environment. Understood within the practice of building information modeling, especially on large complex projects, is the collaboration required of various team members during all design and construction phases to add, delete, modify, enhance, or otherwise update the BIM model for the benefit of the overall project and team.

Integrated project delivery (IPD):

A project delivery approach that integrates people, systems, business structures, and practices into a process that collaboratively harnesses the talents and insights of all participants to optimize project results, increase value to the owner, reduce waste, and maximize efficiency through all phases of design, fabrication, and construction [

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

Primary Literature

  1. Council, AIA National | AIA California (2007) Integrated project delivery: a guide. The American Institute of Architects, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  2. Womack JP, Jones DT (2003) Lean thinking: banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. Free Press, New York. 0-7432-4927-5

    Google Scholar 

  3. Development, World Commission on Environment (1987) Report of the world commission on environment and development: our common future. United Nations, Geneva. Annex to document A/42/427

    Google Scholar 

  4. McLennan JF (2004) The philosophy of sustainable design: the future of architecture. Ecotone, LLC, Kansas City. 0-9749033-0-2

    Google Scholar 

  5. Benyus JM (1998) Biomimicry: innocation inspired by nature. Harper Collins, New York. 0-06-053322-6

    Google Scholar 

  6. King R (2000) Brunelleschi’s dome: how a renaissance genius reinvented architecture. Penguin Group, New York. 0-8027-1366-1

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kellert SR, Heerwagen JH, Mador ML (2008) Biophilic design: the theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life. Wiley, Hoboken. 978-0-470-16334-4

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carson R (1962) Silent spring. Houghton Mifflin Company, New York. 0-618-25305-x

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mattar SG (1983) Buildability and building envelope design. In: Second canadian conference on building science and technology, Waterloo

    Google Scholar 

  10. Womack JP, Jones DT, Roos D (1991) The machine that changed the world: the story of lean production. Harper Perennial Modern Classics, New York. 0-06-097417-6

    Google Scholar 

  11. Holstein WK, Tanenbaum M. Mass production: Encyclopaedia Brittanica. [Online] Encyclopedia Brittanica Online. Cited 9 May 2011. http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/368270/mass-production

  12. Liker JK (2004) The Toyota way: 14 management principles from the World’s greatest manufacturer. McGraw-Hill, New York. 0-07-139231-9

    Google Scholar 

  13. Koskela L et al (2002) The foundations of lean construction. In: Best R, de Valence G (eds) Design and construction: building in value. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ballard G et al (2002) Lean construction tools and techniques. In: Best R, de Valence G (eds) Design and construction: building in value. Butterworth-Heinneman, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lichtig WA (2005) Sutter health: developing a contracting model to support lean project delivery. Lean Construction J 2:105–112

    Google Scholar 

  16. 7group, Reed BG (2009) The integrative design guide to green building: redefining the practice of sustainability. Wiley, Hoboken. 978-0-470-18110-2

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yudelson J (2009) Green building through integrated design. McGraw-Hill, New York. 978-0-07-154601-0

    Google Scholar 

  18. Williams K et al (2000) The NIST report for the MSU EPICenter. NIST, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kats G (2009) Greening our built world: costs, benefits, and strategies. Island Press, Washington, DC. 9781597266680

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lesniewski L, Matthiessen LF, Morris P, Tepfer S (2015) The power of zero: optimizing value for next generation green. BNIM, Kansas City/Missouri

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kieran S, Timberlake J (2004) Refabricating architecture: how manufacturing methodologies are poised to transform building construction. McGraw-Hill, New York. 0-07-143321-X

    Google Scholar 

  22. Krygiel E, Nies B (2008) Green BIM: successful sustainable design with building information modeling. Wiley, Indianapolis. 978-0-470-23960-5

    Google Scholar 

  23. About National BIM Standards. Building Smart Alliance. [Online] National Institute of Building Sciences, 19 Aug 2010. http://www.buildingsmartalliance.org/index.php/nbims/about/

  24. The David and Lucile Packard Foundation (2002) Sustainability report: six scenarios for the David and Lucile Packard Foundation Los altos project. BNIM Architects, Kansas City

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gallaher MP et al (2004) Cost analysis of inadequate interoperability in the U.S. capital facilities industry. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg/Maryland. GCR 04-867

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Wilson EO (1998) Consilience: the Unity of knowledge. Alfred A. Knopf, New York. 0-679-45077-7

    Google Scholar 

  27. Foundation, David Suzuki. Declaration of interdependence. David Suzuki Foundation. [Online] 1992. http://www.davidsuzuki.org/about/declaration/

  28. du Plessis C (2002) Keynote speech at the U.S. green building council greenbuild national conference. s.n., Austin

    Google Scholar 

Books and Reviews

  • Council, AIA National | AIA California (2007) Integrated project delivery: a guide. The American Institute of Architects, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack JP, Jones DT (2003) Lean thinking: banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. Free Press, New York 0-7432-4927-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Development, World Commission on Environment and (1987) Report of the world commission on environment and development: our common future. United Nations, Geneva Annex to document A/42/427

    Google Scholar 

  • McLennan JF (2004) The philosophy of sustainable design: the future of architecture. Ecotone, LLC, Kansas City 0-9749033-0-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Benyus JM (1998) Biomimicry: innocation inspired by nature. Harper Collins, New York 0-06-053322-6

    Google Scholar 

  • King R (2000) Brunelleschi’s dome: how a renaissance genius reinvented architecture. Penguin Group, New York 0-8027-1366-1

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Report of the world commission on environment and development: our common future. Annex to General Assembly document A/42/427, Development and International Cooperation: Environment, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellert SR, Heerwagen JH, Mador ML (2008) Biophilic design: the theory, science, and practice of bringing buildings to life. Wiley, Hoboken 978-0-470-16334-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson R (1962) Silent spring. Houghton Mifflin Company, New York 0-618-25305-x

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattar SG (1983) Buildability and building envelope design. In: Second Canadian conference on building science and technology, Waterloo

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack JP, Jones DT, Roos D (1991) The machine that changed the world: the story of lean production. Harper Perennial Modern Classics, New York 0-06-097417-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Holstein WK, Tanenbaum M. Mass production: Encyclopaedia Brittanica. eb.com. [Online] Encyclopedia Brittanica Online. [Cited: 9 May 2011.] http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/368270/mass-production

  • Liker JK (2004) The Toyota way: 14 management principles from the World’s greatest manufacturer. McGraw-Hill, New York 0-07-139231-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskela L et al (2002) The foundations of lean construction. In: Best R, de Valence G (eds) Design and construction: building in value. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ballard G et al (2002) Lean construction tools and techniques. In: Best R, de Valence G (eds) Design and construction: building in value. Butterworth-Heinneman, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lichtig WA (2005) Sutter health: developing a contracting model to support lean project delivery. Lean Construction Journal 2:105–112

    Google Scholar 

  • 7group, Reed BG (2009) The integrative design guide to green building: redefining the practice of sustainability. Wiley, Hoboken 978-0-470-18110-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Yudelson J (2009) Green building through integrated design. McGraw-Hill, New York 978-0-07-154601-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams K et al (2000) The NIST report for the MSU EPICenter. NIST, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Kats G (2009) Greening our built world: costs, benefits, and strategies. Island Press, Washington, DC ISBN: 9781597266680

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesniewski L, Matthiessen LF, Morris P, Tepfer S (2015) The power of zero: optimizing value for next generation green. BNIM, Kansas City/Missouri

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieran S, Timberlake J (2004) Refabricating architecture: how manufacturing methodologies are poised to transform building construction. McGraw-Hill, New York 0-07-143321-X

    Google Scholar 

  • Krygiel E, Nies B (2008) Green BIM: successful sustainable design with building information modeling. Wiley, Indianapolis 978-0-470-23960-5

    Google Scholar 

  • About National BIM Standards. Building smart alliance. [Online] National Institute of Building Sciences, 19 Aug 2010. http://www.buildingsmartalliance.org/index.php/nbims/about/

  • The David and Lucile Packard Foundation (2002) Sustainability report: six scenarios for the David and Lucile Packard Foundation Los altos project. BNIM Architects, Kansas City

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallaher MP et al (2004) Cost analysis of inadequate interoperability in the U.S. capital facilities industry. National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg/Maryland GCR 04-867

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1998) Consilience: the unity of knowledge. Alfred A. Knopf, New York 0-679-45077-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Foundation, David Suzuki (1992) Declaration of interdependence. David Suzuki Foundation. [Online]. http://www.davidsuzuki.org/about/declaration/

  • du Plessis C (2002) Keynote speech at the U.S. green building council greenbuild national conference. s.n., Austin

    Google Scholar 

  • Svec P, Berkebile R, Todd JA (2012) REGEN: toward a tool for regenerative thinking. Building Research & Information, s.l.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Lesniewski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Lesniewski, L., Berkebile, B. (2018). Sustainable Design and Construction, Integrated Delivery Processes and Building Information Modeling. In: Meyers, R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2493-6_390-3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2493-6_390-3

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2493-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2493-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics