Skip to main content

Light Rail Transit, Shared Infrastructural Issues

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology
  • 303 Accesses

Definition of the Subject

Interest in light rail transit (LRT), as a viable urban transportation system, has been growing worldwide, and new LRT systems are appearing in urban areas of many countries. One advantage of LRT is its ability to use existing railroad infrastructure to reduce construction cost and environmental impact. The majority of LRT systems in the USA share right-of-way or utilize the same tracks but temporally separated from the freight railroads, while commingled or simultaneous operation has been common practice for many countries in Asia and Europe. With the success of LRT applications in recent decades, service providers are looking for more space and infrastructure for expansion. Interest in applying overseas commingled experience in the USA has been growing.

Current Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) policy, dominated by safety concerns, does not allow commingling of LRT and freight rail operations within the same time period. The general practice is that...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

Commingled operation:

Transit trains and freight trains are separated by headway intervals measured in minutes in an operating schedule.

Light rail transit:

Also called streetcar, tramway, or trolley; it is a system with passenger railcars operating singly or in short, usually two-car, trains on fixed rails in right-of-way that is not separated from other traffic for much of the way.

Shared corridor:

Transit and freight operators share a transportation corridor, but tracks are separated by at least 25 ft and no more than 200 ft.

Shared right-of-way:

The transit vehicles run on separate tracks, but track centers are less than 25 ft, that is, separation between the centerline of the freight track and the centerline of the passenger track is less than 25 ft.

Shared track:

Heavy or LRT vehicles operate on the same tracks used by freight trains.

Temporal separation:

Both transit and freight trains utilize the same track but are separated by time windows.

ACS:

Automatic cab signaling

ADA:

Americans with Disabilities Act

APTA:

American Public Transportation Association

ATC:

Automatic Train Control

ATS:

Automatic train stop

CBTC:

Communication-based train control

CFR:

Code of Federal Regulation

CN:

Canadian National

CTC:

Centralized traffic control system

DMU:

Diesel multiple unit

FHWA:

Federal Highway Administration

FRA:

Federal Railroad Administration

FTA:

Federal Transit Administration

GAO:

Government Accountability Office or General Accounting Office, prior to 2004

ICE:

Intercity express train

ITS:

Intelligent transportation system

JNR:

Japanese National Railways

JR:

Japanese Railways

LRT:

Light rail transit

LRV:

Light rail vehicle

MBTA:

Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

MTA:

Maryland Transit Administration

MTDB:

Metropolitan Transportation Development Board

NCTD:

North County Transit District

NJ TRANSIT:

New Jersey Transit

PTC:

Positive train control system

PZB:

Indusi “Punktförmige Zugbeeinflussung” System

ROW:

Right-of-way

RSIA:

Railroad Safety Improvement Act

SDTI:

San Diego Trolley, Inc.

STB:

Surface Transportation Board

SWG:

Shared-Use Working Group

TCRP:

Transit Cooperative Research Program

TPWS:

Train Protection and Warning System

TRB:

Transportation Research Board

UTA:

Utah Transit Authority

VTA:

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority

Bibliography

Primary Literature

  1. Liu RR (2004) Survey of transit/rail freight interaction final report. Submitted to New Jersey Department of Transportation/Federal Highway Administration, submitted by New Jersey Institute of Technology, Sept 2004

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alan B, Nelson D, Stangas P, Liu RR (2006) ITS technologies for integrated rail corridors. Submitted to Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC, Dec 2006

    Google Scholar 

  3. Transportation Research Board (2009) Shared use of railroad infrastructure with non-compliant public transit rail vehicles: a practitioner’s guide. In: Transit cooperative research program report 130, TRB, National Research Council, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  4. America Public Transportation Association (APTA) (2010) 10.2 billion trips taken on US public transportation in 2009, http://www.apta.com/mediacenter/pressreleases/2010/Pages/100308_Ridership_Report.aspx. Accessed Mar 2010

  5. Transportation Research Record (2001) Supplementing and updating TCRP report 52: joint operation of light rail transit or diesel multiple unit vehicles with railroads. In: Research result digest, TRB, National Research Council, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  6. America Public Transportation Association (APTA) (2009) Public transportation fact book, 60th edn. American Public Transportation Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boorse J, Tennyson E, Schumann J (2000) This is light rail transit. Conference proceedings of 8th national conferences on light rail transit, Dallas, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grava S (2003) Urban transportation systems. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Thompson G (2003) Defining an alternative future: birth of the light rail movement in North America, experience, economics, and evaluation from starter lines to growing systems. Proceedings of the 9th national light rail transit conference. Transportation Research Board, Portland, pp 25–36

    Google Scholar 

  10. US Department of Transportation (1996) Transportation expressions, research and special projects administration, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schumann J (1977) Historical of railroad and transit joint track use, unpublished paper

    Google Scholar 

  12. Vigrass J (1995) Joint use of track by electric railways and railroads: historic view. The proceeding of the 7th joint conference on light rail transit, vol 1. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp 154–163

    Google Scholar 

  13. Phraner D, Roberts R, Stangas P, Korach K, Shortreed J, Thompson G (1999) Joint operation of light rail transit or diesel multiple unit vehicles with railroads, TCRP report 52. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  14. Federal Railroad Administration (2000) Shared use of the tracks of the general railroad system by conventional railroads and light rail transit systems. Fed Regist 65:42529–42553

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schulte CF (2001) General system and rail transit common corridor safety. Rail transit conference, Boston, 2001

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sheys KM, Spear T (2000) Safety oversight of shared track operations: an update, the proceeding of the 8th joint conference on light rail transit, Dallas, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  17. Phraner D (2000) Light rail sharing track with other rail modes: how far have we come at the millennium? The proceeding of the 8th joint conference on light rail transit, Dallas, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  18. Christner P, Mauri P (2005) Sharing of track by transit and freight railroads access, safety, and insurance issues. Prepared for Walter Kulyk and Venkat Pindiprolu, Federal Transit Administration, US Department of Transportation, John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, United States Department of Transportation, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ensco, ICF, KKO, Mayville (2005) Safety of non-compliant passenger rail equipment, Draft report, Federal Railroad Administration, Office of Research and Development, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tereschuck P (2005) Draft of implementation strategy. Joint LRT/freight operations. Unpublished report

    Google Scholar 

  21. Geissenheimer H (1997) New vehicle options for lower-cost rail mobility: using diesel or dual-powered light rail cars as a transfer of technology, Transportation research record, no. 1571. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp 125–133

    Google Scholar 

  22. Homburger W (1998) Practitioner’s forum. J Transp Eng 124(5):402–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Phraner D (2002) German track sharing experience, TCRP research result digest 47. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  24. Phraner D (2000) German shared track experience independent supplemental technical study tour findings, TCRP Project J06, Task 34

    Google Scholar 

  25. May J (2005) Nordhausen tram trains rule OK. Tramways & Urban transit Nov 2005. http://www.lrta.org

  26. Transportation Research Board (2003) Transit capacity and quality of service manual, 2nd edn. In: Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 100, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC 2003

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lightrail Now (2010) Rail transit systems in operation. http://www.lightrailnow.org/. Accessed Jan 2010

  28. Federal Transit Administration (2003) National transit database. Federal Transit Administration, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  29. Association of America Railroad (2010) Weekly traffic summary report, http://www.aar.org/NewsAndEvents/WeeklyTrafficReport.aspx. Accessed Jan 2010

  30. Transportation Research Board (1999) Joint operation of light rail transit or diesel multiple unit vehicles with railroads. In: Transit Cooperative Research Program Report 52, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC 1999

    Google Scholar 

  31. Iwasa K (2001) Rail freight in Japan – the situation today and challenges for tomorrow. Jpn Railw Transp Rev 26:8–17

    Google Scholar 

  32. General Accounting Office (2004) Information and guidance could help facilitate commuter and freight rail access negotiations. GAO-04-240

    Google Scholar 

  33. Nash A (2003) Best practices in shared-use high-speed rail systems. Mineta Transportation Institute, College of Business, San Jose State University, San Jose

    Google Scholar 

  34. Federal Transit Administration (2010) Rail transit safety initiative. http://fta.dot.gov/11039_11052.htm. Accessed Jan 2010

  35. Liu RR, Nelson DO, Lu A (2009) Business model for shared operations of freight and passenger services (09–2547). J Transp Res Board (TRB) 2547:86–92. Transportation Research Record (TRR), Washington, DC

    Article  Google Scholar 

Books and Reviews

  • California Public Utilities Commission (1991) General order 143-B, Safety rules and regulations governing light-rail transit, San Francisco, 1991 as amended

    Google Scholar 

  • Choueiry E, Bullock D (2002) Light rail DMU on shared right of way. Proceedings of commuter rail/rail transit conference, 9–13 June 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu RR, Yang F (2006) A national survey of shared use of railroad infrastructure and LRT service. Proceedings of the 85th annual conference of Transportation Research Board, Jan 2006. Peer reviewed

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu RR, Yang F, Chen M (2005) Understanding the shared operation of commuter rail transit and freight railroads. J Transp Res Forum 44(1):157–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu RR, Yang F, Bing A (2007) State of the practice on commingled operation of light rail transit and freight rail services. Proceedings of the 86th annual conference of Transportation Research Board, Jan 2007. Peer reviewed

    Google Scholar 

  • Sela E, Randolph R, Hickey T (2003) Shared use corridors: survey of current practice and recommendations for the future. Proceedings of Transportation Research Board 9th national light rail transit conference, 16–18 Nov 2003

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rongfang Rachel Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Liu, R.R. (2015). Light Rail Transit, Shared Infrastructural Issues. In: Meyers, R. (eds) Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2493-6_295-3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2493-6_295-3

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2493-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics