Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology

Living Edition
| Editors: Robert A. Meyers

Geothermal Power Economics

  • Subir K. SanyalEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2493-6_232-3


Capital cost

Capital costs are the one-time costs incurred on project acquisition, drilling, construction, and equipment needed to bring a project to a commercially operable status.

Levelized power cost

The present value of the total cost of developing and operating a geothermal power plant over its economic life divided by the total power generated over the same period, costs being levelized in real dollars (i.e., adjusted to remove the impact of inflation).

Make-up well cost

Cost of drilling “make-up” wells as needed during project operation.

Operations and maintenance (O&M) Cost

Those expenses used for the day-to-day operation of a power facility. The major categories include personnel, general and administrative, insurance, supplies and services, well maintenance, and equipment maintenance costs.

Power capacity

The maximum output of power from a power plant, commonly expressed in megawatts (MW).

Definition of the Subject and Its Importance

Geothermal power is the rate of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. 1.
    Sanyal SK (2005) Levelized cost of geothermal power – how sensitive it is? Trans Geotherm Res Counc 29:459Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Entingh DJ, McVeigh JF (2003) Historical improvements in geothermal power systems costs. Trans Geotherm Res Counc 533Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sanyal SK, Menzies AJ, Brown PJ, Enedy KL, Enedy S (1989) A systematic approach to decline curve analysis for the geysers steam field, California. Trans Geotherm Res Council, Santa Rosa, p 415Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sanyal SK, Robertson-Tait A, Klein CW, Butler SJ, Lovekin JW, Brown PJ, Sudarman S, Sulaiman S (2000) Assessment of steam supply for the expansion of generation capacity from 140 to 200 MW, Kamojang Geothermal Field, West Java Indonesia. In: Trans World Geotherm Congress, Beppu/Morioka, p 2195Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    MIT (2006) The future of geothermal energy – impact of enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) on the United States in the 21st century. An assessment by an MIT – led interdisciplinary panel. Massachusetts Institute of Technololgy, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sanyal SK, Morrow JW, Butler SJ, Robertson-Tait A (2007) Is EGS commercially feasible? Trans Geotherm Res Counc 31:2007Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GeothermEx, Inc.RichmondUSA