Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology

Living Edition
| Editors: Robert A. Meyers

Simulation Models as Tools for Crop Management

  • Herman van Keulen
  • Senthold Asseng
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2493-6_1047-1

Glossary

Decision support system (DSS)

a class of information systems (including but not limited to computerized systems) that support business and organizational decision-making activities. A properly designed DSS is an interactive software-based system intended to help decision-makers compile useful information from a combination of raw data, documents, personal knowledge, or business models to identify and solve problems and make decisions

Farming system

the particular mix of agricultural activities in which a farm household engages

Model

simplified mathematical description of a system

Operational crop management

decisions concerned with daily activities of the farm, in response to the current state of the system and the (anticipated) environment

Simulation

building a model and studying its dynamic behavior

Strategic crop management

decisions with respect to agroecosystems on the basis of the expected long-term performance of these systems, as influenced by the natural resource base...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

Primary Literature

  1. 1.
    Lentz W (1998) Model applications in horticulture: a review. Sci Hortic 74:151–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    van Keulen H (1987) Forecasting and estimating effects of weather on yield. Plant growth Modell Resour Manag 1:105–124Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brouwer R, De Wit CT (1968) A simulation model of plant growth, with special attention to root growth and its consequences. Root Growth 391:224–244Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Wit CT (1970) Dynamic concepts in Biology. In: Prediction and measurement of photosynthetic productivity. Symposium of illustrated. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Wit CT, Brouwer R, Penning De Vries FW (1970) The simulation of photosynthetic systems, In : Prediction and Measurement of Photosynthetic Productivity. Symposium of illustrated Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sinclair TR, Seligman NG (1996) Crop modeling: from infancy to maturity. Agron J 88:698–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bouman BAM, vanKeulen H, vanLaar HH, Rabbinge R (1996) The ‘School of de Wit’ crop growth simulation models: a pedigree and historical overview. Agric Syst 52:171–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boote KJ, Jones JW, Pickering NB (1996) Potential uses and limitations of crop models. Agron J 88:704–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    van Ittersum MK et al (2003) On approaches and applications of the Wageningen crop models. Eur J Agron 18:201–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hammer GL, Kropff MJ, Sinclair TR, Porter JR (2002) Future contributions of crop modelling – from heuristics and supporting decision making to understanding genetic regulation and aiding crop improvement. Eur J Agron 18:15–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chenu K et al (2017) Contribution of crop models to adaptation in wheat. Trends Plant Sci 22:472–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boote KJ, Jones JW, White JW, Asseng S, Lizaso JI (2013) Putting mechanisms into crop production models. Plant Cell Environ 36:1658–1672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rabbinge R, Goudriaan J, Van Keulen H, Penning de Vries F, Van Laar HH (eds) (1990) Theoretical production ecology: reflections and prospects. Pudoc, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Asseng S et al (2015) Rising temperatures reduce global wheat production. Nat Clim Chang 5:143–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosegrant MW et al (2014) Food security in a world of natural resource scarcity: the role of agricultural technologies. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI), Washington, DC, p 250.  https://doi.org/10.2499/9780896298477
  16. 16.
    Rosenzweig C et al (2014) Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:3268–3273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ewert F et al (2015) Crop modelling for integrated assessment of risk to food production from climate change. Environ Model Softw 72:287–303Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    van Ittersum MK et al (2008) Integrated assessment of agricultural systems – a component-based framework for the European Union (SEAMLESS). Agric Syst 96:150–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rosenzweig C et al (2013) The Agricultural model intercomparison and improvement project (AgMIP): protocols and pilot studies. Agric For Meteorol 170:166–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Seligman NG (1990) Theoretical production ecology: reflections and prospects. In: Symposium on theoretical production ecology: hindsight and perspectives, Simulation monographs, Wageningen, pp 249–263Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Asseng S, Zhu Y, Wang E, Zhang W (2014) Crop modeling for climate change impact and adaptation. In: Sadras V, Calderini D (eds) In crop physiology: applications for genetic improvement and agronomy. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 505–546Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cox PG (1996) Some issues in the design of agricultural decision support systems. Agric Syst 52:355–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Meinke H et al (2001) Increasing profits and reducing risks in crop production using participatory systems simulation approaches. Agric Syst 70:493–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nelson RA, Holzworth DP, Hammer GL, Hayman PT (2002) Infusing the use of seasonal climate forecasting into crop management practice in North East Australia using discussion support software. Agric Syst 74:393–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    McCown RL, Hammer GL, Hargreaves JNG, Holzworth DP, Freebairn DM (1996) APSIM: a novel software system for model development, model testing and simulation in agricultural systems research. Agric Syst 50:255–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Keating BA et al (2003) An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation. Eur J Agron 18:267–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stockle CO, Donatelli M, Nelson R (2003) CropSyst, a cropping systems simulation model. Eur J Agron 18:289–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Stöckle CO, Donatelli M (1997) The CropSyst model: a brief description. In: Rotation models for ecological farming. Quantitative approaches in systems analysis, no. 10. AB-DLO, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brisson N et al (2003) An overview of the crop model STICS. Eur J Agron 18:309–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jones JW et al (2003) The DSSAT cropping system model. Eur J Agron 18:235–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    van Keulen H, Stol W (1995) Agro-ecological zonation for potato production. In: Current issues in production ecology; Potato ecology and modelling of crops under conditions limiting growth, vol 3, pp 357–371Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    de Vries FWT, van Keulen H, Rabbinge R 1995 Natural resources and limits of food production in 2040. In: Eco-regional approaches for sustainable land use and food production: proceedings of a symposium on eco-regional approaches in agricultural research. ISNAR, HagueGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Asseng S, Travasso MI, Ludwig F, Magrin GO (2012) Has climate change opened new opportunities for wheat cropping in Argentina? Clim Chang:1–16Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Raymundo R et al (2018, in press) Climate change impact on global potato production. Eur J Agron  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2017.11.008
  35. 35.
    Zhao C et al (2017) Temperature increase reduces global yields of major crops in four independent estimates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:9326–9331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Liu B et al (2016) Similar estimates of temperature impacts on global wheat yield by three independent methods. Nat Clim Chang 6:1130-+CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    van Ittersum MK, Rabbinge R (1997) Concepts in production ecology for analysis and quantification of agricultural input-output combinations. Field Crop Res 52:197–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hengsdijk H, van Ittersum MK (2002) A goal-oriented approach to identify and engineer land use systems. Agric Syst 71:231–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Rabbinge R, Vanlatesteijn HC (1992) Long-term options for land-use in the European community. Agric Syst 40:195–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    ten Berge HFM et al (2000) Farming options for The Netherlands explored by multi-objective modelling. Eur J Agron 13:263–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Roetter R, Van Keulen H, Van Laar HH (2000) Synthesis of methodology development and case studies. In: Sysnet research paper series, no. 3. International Rice Research Institute, Los BanosGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Dogliotti S, Rossing WAH, van Ittersum MK (2004) Systematic design and evaluation of crop rotations enhancing soil conservation, soil fertility and farm income: a case study for vegetable farms in South Uruguay. Agric Syst 80:277–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Dogliotti S, van Ittersum MK, Rossing WAH (2005) A method for exploring sustainable development options at farm scale: a case study for vegetable farms in South Uruguay. Agric Syst 86:29–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    van de Ven GWJ, van Keulen H (2007) A mathematical approach to comparing environmental and economic goals in dairy farming: identifying strategic development options. Agric Syst 94:231–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hengsdijk H, Bouman BAM, Nieuwenhuyse A, Jansen HGP (1999) Quantification of land use systems using technical coefficient generators: a case study for the Northern Atlantic zone of Costa Rica. Agric Syst 61:109–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Laborte AG et al (2009) Farmers’ welfare, food production and the environment: a model-based assessment of the effects of new technologies in the Northern Philippines. Njas-Wageningen J Life Sci 56:345–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hengsdijk H et al (2007) Poverty and biodiversity trade-offs in rural development: a case study for Pujiang county, China. Agric Syst 94:851–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ponsioen TC et al (2006) TechnoGIN, a tool for exploring and evaluating resource use efficiency of cropping systems in East and Southeast Asia. Agric Syst 87:80–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Abrecht DG, Robinson SD (1996) TACT: a tactical decision aid using a CERES based wheat simulation model. Ecol Model 86:241–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Stone RC, Meinke H (2005) Operational seasonal forecasting of crop performance. Philos Trans R Soc B 360:2109–2124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Hochman Z et al (2009) Re-inventing model-based decision support with Australian dryland farmers. 4. Yield Prophet (R) helps farmers monitor and manage crops in a variable climate. Crop Pasture Sci 60:1057–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Nelson RA et al (1999) User’s guide for whopper cropper (CD-ROM) version 2.1. QZ99013. Department of Primary Industries, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Fraisse CW et al (2006) AgClimate: a climate forecast information system for agricultural risk management in the southeastern USA. Comput Electron Agric 53:13–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Muchow RC, Bellamy JA (1991) Climatic risk in crop production: models and management for the semiarid tropics and subtropics. CAB International, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Stone RC, Hammer GL, Marcussen T (1996) Prediction of global rainfall probabilities using phases of the southern oscillation index. Nature 384:252–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hammer G, Nicholls N, Mitchell C (eds) (2000) Applications of seasonal climate forecasting in agricultural and natural ecosystems – the Australian experience. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 469 ppGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Carberry PS (2001) Are science rigour and industry relevance both achievable in participatory action research? In: Proceedings Australian agronomy conference, hobart, Jan 2001, vol 14, pp 22–28.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Hammer G (2000) Applying seasonal climate forecasts in agricultural and natural ecosystems — A Synthesis. In: Hammer GL, Nicholls N, Mitchell C (eds) Applications of seasonal climate forecasting in agricultural and natural ecosystems – the Australian experience. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp. 453–462Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Asseng S, Thomas D, McIntosh P, Alves O, Khimashia N (2012) Managing mixed wheat-sheep farms with a seasonal forecast. Agric Syst 113:50–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Asseng S, McIntosh PC, Wang GM, Khimashia N, Optimal N (2012) fertiliser management based on a seasonal forecast. Eur J Agron 38:66–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Royce FS, Fraisse CW, Baigorria GA (2011) ENSO classification indices and summer crop yields in the Southeastern USA. Agric For Meteorol 151:817–826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Hoogenboom G et al (2007) Climate-based agricultural risk management tools for Florida, Georgia and Alabama, USA. In: Climate prediction and agriculture: advances and challenges, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 273–278Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Messina CD, Hansen JW, Hall AJ (1999) Land allocation conditioned on El Nino Southern Oscillation phases in the Pampas of Argentina. Agric Syst 60:197–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Ramírez Rodrigues MA, Asseng S, Fraisse C, Stefanova L, Eisenkolbi A (2014) Tailoring wheat management to ENSO phases for increased wheat production in Paraguay. Clim Risk Manag 3:24–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Hansen JW, Indeje M (2004) Linking dynamic seasonal climate forecasts with crop simulation for maize yield prediction in semi-arid Kenya. Agric For Meteorol 125:143–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Wopereis MCS, Bouman BAM, Tuong TP, Ten Berge HFM, Kropff MJ (1996) ORYZA_W: rice growth model for irrigated and rainfed environments. In: SARP research proceedings. AB-DLO, 159 ppGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Lansigan FP, Pandey S, Bouman BAM (1997) Combining crop modelling with economic risk-analysis for the evaluation of crop management strategies. Field Crop Res 51:133–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Macrobert JF, Savage MJ (1998) The use of a crop simulation model for planning wheat irrigation in Zimbabwe. In: Tsuji GY, Hoogenboom G, Thornton PK (eds) Understanding options for agricultural production. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 205–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Ko JH, Piccinni G, Steglich E (2009) Using EPIC model to manage irrigated cotton and maize. Agric Water Manag 96:1323–1331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Richards QD, Bange MP, Johnston SB (2008) HydroLOGIC: an irrigation management system for Australian cotton. Agric Syst 98:40–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Hearn AB (1994) OZCOT – a simulation-model for cotton crop management. Agric Syst 44:257–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Ten Berge HFM, Shi QZ, Rao ZKS, Riethoven JJM, Zhong X (1997) Numerical optimization of nitrogen application to rice. Part II. Field evaluations. Field Crop Res 51:43–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Ten Berge HFM et al (1997) Numerical optimization of nitrogen application to rice. Part I. Description of MANAGE-N. Field Crop Res 51:29–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Thiyagarajan TM, Stalin P, Dobermann A, Cassman KG, tenBerge HFM (1997) Soil N supply and plant N uptake by irrigated rice in Tamil Nadu. Field Crop Res 51:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    ZhiMing Z et al (1997) Evaluation of a model recommended for N fertilizer application in irrigated rice. Chin Rice Res Newslett 5:7–8Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Wang E, Xu JH, Smith CJ (2008) Value of historical climate knowledge, SOI-based seasonal climate forecasting and stored soil moisture at sowing in crop nitrogen management in south eastern Australia. Agric For Meteorol 148:1743–1753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Aggarwal P, Kalra N, Chander S, Pathak H (2006) InfoCrop: a dynamic simulation model for the assessment of crop yields, losses due to pests, and environmental impact of agro-ecosystems in tropical environments. I. Model description. Agric Syst 89:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Yadav DS, Chander S (2010) Simulation of rice planthopper damage for developing pest management decision support tools. Crop Prot 29:267–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Fischer A, Kergoat L, Dedieu G (1997) Coupling satellite data with vegetation functional models: review of different approaches and perspectives suggested by the assimilation strategy. Remote Sens Rev 15:283–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Moulin S, Bondeau A, Delecolle R (1998) Combining agricultural crop models and satellite observations: from field to regional scales. Int J Remote Sens 19:1021–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Jongschaap REE, Quiroz RA (2000) Integrating remote sensing with process-based simulation models to assess primary production capacity for grazing lands in The Andes. In: Proceedings of 5th seminar on GIS and developing countries: GISDECO 2000, Los BañosGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Clevers JPGW et al (2002) Using SPOT data for calibrating a wheat growth model under Mediterranean conditions. Agronomie 22:687–694Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Cabelguenne M (1996) Irrigation scheduling from theory to practice. Water Reports, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, pp 185–193Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Doorenbos J, Kassam AH, Bentvelsen C, Vittenbogaard G (1979) Yield response to water. Irrigation and agricultural development, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp 257–280Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Williams JR, Jones CA, Dyke PT (1984) A modeling approach to determining the relationship between erosion and soil productivity. Trans ASAE 27:129–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Cabelguenne M, Debaeke P, Puech J, Bosc N (1997) Real time irrigation management using the EPIC-PHASE model and weather forecasts. Agric Water Manag 32:227–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    McGlinchey MG, Inman-Bamber N, Culverwell TL, Els M (1995) An irrigation scheduling method based on a crop model and an automatic weather station. In: Proceedings of the annual congress of the South African sugar technologists’ association, vol 69, pp 69–73Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Plauborg F, Heidmann T (1996) Irrigation scheduling from theory to practice. Water Reports, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, pp 177–184Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Hess T (1996) A microcomputer scheduling program for supplementary irrigation. Comput Electron Agric 15:233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Hess TM (1990) Practical experiences of operating a farm irrigation scheduling service in England. Acta Hortic 278:871–878CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Tollefson L (1996) Requirements for improved interactive communication between researchers, managers, extensionists and farmers. In: ICID F (ed) Irrigation scheduling from theory to practice (water Reports). FAO, Rome, pp 217–226Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Vellidis G et al (2016) Development and assessment of a smartphone application for irrigation scheduling in cotton. Comput Electron Agric 127:249–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Migliaccio KW, Morgan KT, Fraisse C, Vellidis G, Andreis JH (2015) Performance evaluation of urban turf irrigation smartphone app. Comput Electron Agric 118:136–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Ines AVM, Honda K, Das Gupta A, Droogers P, Clemente RS (2006) Combining remote sensing-simulation modeling and genetic algorithm optimization to explore water management options in irrigated agriculture. Agric Water Manag 83:221–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Bastiaanssen WGM, Menenti M, Feddes RA, Holtslag AAM (1998) A remote sensing surface energy balance algorithm for land (SEBAL) – 1. Formulation. J Hydrol 212:198–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Groot JJR, Van Keulen H (1990) Prospects for improvement of nitrogen fertilizer recommendations for cereals: A simulation study. In: Van Beusichem ML (ed) Plant nutrition: physiology and applications. Developments in plant and soil sciences. vol 41. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 685–692Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Li FY et al (2009) AmaizeN: a decision support system for optimizing nitrogen management of maize. Njas-Wageningen J Life Sci 57:93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Basso B, Liu L, Ritchie JT (2016) A comprehensive review of the CERES-Wheat, −Maize and -Rice models’ performances. Adv Agron 136:27–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Basso B, Ritchie JT, Cammarano D, Sartori L (2011) A strategic and tactical management approach to select optimal N fertilizer rates for wheat in a spatially variable field. Eur J Agron 35:215–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Basso B, Cammarano D, Fiorentino C, Ritchie JT (2013) Wheat yield response to spatially variable nitrogen fertilizer in Mediterranean environment. Eur J Agron 51:65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Asseng S, Turner NC, Keating BA (2001) Analysis of water- and nitrogen-use efficiency of wheat in a Mediterranean climate. Plant Soil 233:127–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Moeller C, Asseng S, Berger J, Milroy SP (2009) Plant available soil water at sowing in Mediterranean environments – is it a useful criterion to aid nitrogen fertiliser and sowing decisions? Field Crop Res 114:127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Asseng S, McIntosh PC, Thomas G, Ebert EE, Khimashia N (2016) Is a 10-day rainfall forecast of value in dry-land wheat cropping? Agric For Meteorol 216:170–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Zadoks JC (1981) EPIPRE: a disease and pest management system for winter wheat developed in The Netherlands. EPPO Bull 11:365–369Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Rabbinge R., Rijsdijk FH (1983) EPIPRE: a disease and pest management system for winter wheat, taking account of micrometeorological factors. EPPO Bull 13:297–305Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Smeets E, Vandenriessche H, Hendrickx G, De Wijngaert K, Geypens M (1992) Photosanitary balance of winter wheat in 1992 by the EPIPRE advice system. Parasitica 48:139–148Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Djurle A (1988) Experiences and results from the use of Epipre in Sweden. In: Royle DJ, Rabbinge R, Flueckiger CR (eds). Pest and disease models in forecasting crop loss appraisal and decision supported crop protection systems, vol 11. Long Ashton Research Station, Bristol, pp 94–95Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Forrer HR (1988) Experince and current stautus of Epipre in Switzerland. In: Royle DJ, Rabbinge R, Flueckiger CR (eds). Pest and disease models in forecasting crop loss appraisal and decision supported crop protection systems, vol 11. Long Ashton Research Station, Bristol, pp 91–93Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Macadam R et al (1990) The use of soft systems methodology to improve the adaptation by Australian cotton growers of the SIRATAC computer-based crop management system. Agric Syst 34:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Hamilton WD, Woodruff DR, Jamieson AM (1991) Climatic risk in crop production: models and management for the semiarid tropics and subtropics. In: Muchow RC, Bellamy JA (eds) Proceedings of the international symposium. CAB International, Brisbane, pp 411–423Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Montone VO et al (2016) Evaluation of leaf wetness duration models for operational use in strawberry disease-warning systems in four US states. Int J Biometeorol 60:1761–1774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Pavan W, Fraisse CW, Peres NA (2011) Development of a web-based disease forecasting system for strawberries. Comput Electron Agric 75:169–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Roetter RP et al (2005) Integration of systems network (SysNet) tools for regional land use scenario analysis in Asia. Environ Model Softw 20:291–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Roetter RP, Laborte AG, Van Keulen H (2000) Using SysNet tools to quantify the trade-off between food production and environmental quality. Int Rice Res Newsl Dec 2000:4–9Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    van Ittersum MK et al (2004) A systems network (SysNet) approach for interactively evaluating strategic land use options at sub-national scale in South and South-east Asia. Land Use Policy 21:101–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Challinor AJ et al (2014) A meta-analysis of crop yield under climate change and adaptation. Nat Clim Change 4:287–291Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    van Keulen H (2007) Quantitative analyses of natural resource management options at different scales. Agric Syst 94:768–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Van Paassen A, Roetter RP, Van Keulen H, Hoanh CT (2007) Can computer models stimulate learning about sustainable land use? Experience with LUPAS in the humid (sub-)tropics of Asia. Agric Syst 94:874–887CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Sterk B et al (2009) The interface between land use systems research and policy: multiple arrangements and leverages. Land Use Policy 26:434–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    David A (2001) Models implementation: a state of the art. Eur J Oper Res 134:459–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Rykiel EJ Jr et al (2002) Science and decision-making. In: Costanza R, Jörgensen SE (eds) Understanding and solving environmental problems in the 21st century. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 153–166Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Walker DH (2002) Decision support, learning and rural resource management. Agric Syst 73:113–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Rosenzweig C, Hillel D (eds) (2015) Handbook of climate change and agroecosystems: the agricultural model intercomparison and improvement project (AgMIP) integrated crop and economic assessments (in two parts), vol 3. Imperial College Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Carberry PS et al (2002) The FARMSCAPE approach to decision support: farmers’, advisers’, researchers’ monitoring, simulation, communication and performance evaluation. Agric Syst 74:141–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Hargreaves DMG, Hochman Z, Dalgliesh N, Poulton P (2001) Proceedings of the tenth Australian agronomy conference, HobartGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    McCown RL (2002) Changing systems for supporting farmers’ decisions: problems, paradigms, and prospects. Agric Syst 74:179–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Bartels W et al (2012) Developing a learning community: lessons from a climate working group for agriculture in the southeast USA. SECC technical reportGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Breuer NE, Fraisse CW, Hildebrand PE (2009) Molding the pipeline into a loop: the participatory process of developing AgroClimate, a decision support system for climate risk reduction in agriculture. J Serv Climatol 3:1–12Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    Mbabazi D et al (2017) An irrigation schedule testing model for optimization of the Smartirrigation avocado app. Agric Water Manag 179:390–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Asseng S et al (2013) Uncertainty in simulating wheat yields under climate change. Nat Clim Chang 3:827–832CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Fleisher DH et al (2017) A potato model intercomparison across varying climates and productivity levels. Glob Chang Biol 23:1258–1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Li T et al (2015) Uncertainties in predicting rice yield by current crop models under a wide range of climatic conditions. Glob Chang Biol 21:1328–1341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Bassu S et al (2014) How do various maize crop models vary in their responses to climate change factors? Glob Chang Biol 20:2301–2320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Dalgliesh NP, Foale MA, McCown RL (2009) Re-inventing model-based decision support with Australian dryland farmers. 2. Pragmatic provision of soil information for paddock-specific simulation and farmer decision making. Crop Pasture Sci 60:1031–1043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    McCown RL, Carberry PS, Hochman Z, Dalgliesh NP, Foale MA (2009) Re-inventing model-based decision support with Australian dryland farmers. 1. Changing intervention concepts during 17 years of action research. Crop Pasture Sci 60:1017–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Ewert F et al (2015) Crop modelling for integrated assessment of risk to food production from climate change. Environ Model Softw 72:287–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Books and Reviews

  1. Asseng S, Zhu Y, Basso B, Wilson T, Cammarano D (2014a) Simulation modeling: applications in cropping systems. In: Van Alfen NK (ed) Encyclopedia of agriculture and food systems. Academic Press, Oxford, pp 102–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asseng S, Zhu Y, Wang E, Zhang W (2014b) Crop modeling for climate change impact and adaptation. In: Sadras V, Calderini D (eds) Crop physiology: applications for genetic improvement and agronomy. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 505–546Google Scholar
  3. Boote KJ, Jones JW, White JW, Asseng S, Lizaso JI (2013) Putting mechanisms into crop production models. Plant Cell Environ 36:1658–1672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chenu K, Porter JR, Martre P, Basso B, Chapman SC, Ewert F, Bindi M, Asseng S (2017) Contribution of crop models to adaptation in wheat. Trends Plant Sci 22:472–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gary C, Heuvelink E (1998) Advances and bottlenecks in modelling crop growth: Summary of a group discussion. Acta Hortic 456:101–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goudriaan J, Van Laar HH (1994) Modelling potential crop growth processes. Textbook with exercises. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Guarin JR, Asseng S (2017) Chapter 27: wheat crop modeling to improve yields. In: Langridge P (ed) Achieving sustainable wheat cultivation. Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing Limited, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Leffelaar PA (1993) On system analysis and simulation of ecological processes, with examples in CSMP and FORTRAN. Current issues in production ecology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  9. Matthews RB, Stephens W (2002) Crop-soil simulation models: applications in developing countries. CAB International, WallingfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Roetter RP, Van Keulen H, Kuiper M, Verhagen J, Van Laar HH (2007) Science for agriculture and rural development in low-income countries. Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. van Ittersum MK, Donatelli M (2003) Modelling cropping systems-highlights of the symposium and preface to the special issues. Eur J Agron 18:187–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Willocquet L, Savary S, Fernandez L, Elazegui FA, Castilla N, Zhu D, Tang Q, Huang S, Lin X, Singh HM, Srivastava RK (2002) Structure and validation of RICEPEST, a production situation-driven, crop growth model simulating rice yield response to multiple pest injuries for tropical Asia. Ecol Model 153:247–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wolf J, Van Ittersum MK (2009) Crop models: main developments, their use in CGMS and Integrated modeling. Agro-Informatica 22:15–18Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chairgroup Plant Production SystemsWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Business Unit Agrosystems Research, Plant Research InternationalWageningen University and Research CentreWageningenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Institute of Food and Agricultural SciencesUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Roxana Savin
    • 1
  • Gustavo Slafer
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Crop and Forest Sciences and AGROTECNIO, (Center for Research in Agrotechnology)University of LleidaLleidaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Crop and Forest SciencesUniversity of LleidaLleidaSpain