Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology

Living Edition
| Editors: Robert A. Meyers

Source–Sink Relationships in Cereals and Legumes

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2493-6_1037-1

Glossary

Critical period

Correspond to the time lapse during the crop cycle in which grain number per square meter is highly sensitive to environmental conditions.

Crop development

The sequence of processes and events involved in producing new organs throughout the crop cycle of a crop.

Grain filling period

Time lapse of grain growth from flowering to physiological maturity.

Source–sink relationship

Refers to the balance between the assimilate production in photosynthesis and the assimilate utilization for grain yield of crops.

Definition of the Subject

Cereals and grain legume crops are widely sown along the world and their importance as a source of feed and food is indisputable mainly as a source of carbohydrates and proteins, respectively. Grain yield of these crops can be defined as the product of grain number per unit area and the average grain weight. Source-sink manipulations, in cereals, have shown the critical period for grain number determination occurs mainly at the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    Graham P, Vance C (2003) Legumes: importance and constraints to greater use. Plant Physiol 131:872–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ray H, Bett K, Tar’an B, Vandenberg A, Thavarajah D, Warkentin T (2014) Mineral micronutrient content of cultivars of field pea, chickpea, common bean, and lentil grown in Saskatchewan, Canada. Crop Sci 54:1698–1708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Slafer GA, Halloran GM, Connor DJ (1994) Development rate in wheat as affected by duration and rate of change of photoperiod. Ann Bot 73:671–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Slafer GA, Rawson HM (1994) Sensitivity of wheat phasic development to major environmental factors: a re-examination of some assumptions made by physiologists and modellers. Aust J Plant Physiol 21:393–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Miralles DJ, Richards RA (2000) Response of leaf and tiller emergence and primordium initiation in wheat and barley to interchanged photoperiod. Ann Bot 85:655–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Calderini DF, Abeledo LG, Savin R, Slafer GA (1999) Effect of temperature and carpel size during pre-anthesis on potential grain weight in wheat. J Agric Sci 132:453–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ugarte C, Calderini DF, Slafer GA (2007) Grain weight and grain number responsiveness to pre-anthesis temperature in wheat, barley and triticale. Field Crop Res 100:240–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lindström LI, Pellegrini CN, Aguirrezábal LAN, Hernández LF (2006) Growth and development of sunflower fruits under shade during pre and early post-anthesis period. Field Crop Res 96:151–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Scott RW, Appleyard M, Fellowes G, Kirby EJM (1983) Effect of genotype and position in the ear on carpel and grain growth and mature grain weight of spring barley. J Agric Sci 100:383–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yang Z, van Oosterom EJ, Jordan DR, Hammer GL (2009) Pre-anthesis ovary development determines genotypic differences in potential kernel weight in sorghum. J Exp Bot 60:1399–1408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Knott CM (1987) A key for stages of development of the pea (Pisum sativum). Ann Appl Biol 111:233–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ney B, Duthion C, Fontaine E (1993) Timing of reproductive abortions in relation to cell division, water content, and growth of pea seeds. Crop Sci 33:267–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hay RK, Kirby EJ (1991) Convergence and synchrony – a review of the coordination of development in wheat. Aust J Agric Res 42:661–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Dracup M, Kirby EJM (1996) Lupin development guide. University of Western Australia, NedlandsGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ney B, Turc O (1993) Heat-unit-based description of the reproductive development of pea. Crop Sci 33:510–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dumoulin V, Ney B, Etévé G (1994) Variability of seed and plant development in pea. Crop Sci 34:992–998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Munier-Jolain NG, Ney B, Duthion C (1993) Sequential development of flowers and seeds on the main stem of an indeterminate soybean. Crop Sci 33:768–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peltonen-Sainio P, Kangas A, Salo Y, Jauhiainen L (2007) Grain number dominates grain weight in temperate cereal yield determination: evidence based on 30 years of multi-location trials. Field Crop Res 100:179–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sadras VO (2007) Evolutionary aspects of the trade-off between seed size and number in crops. Field Crop Res 100:125–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bruckner PL, Frohberg RC (1987) Stress tolerance and adaptation in spring wheat. Crop Sci 27:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Abbate PE, Andrade FH, Lázaro L, Bariffi JH, Berardocco HG, Inza VH, Marturano F (1998) Grain yield increase in recent Argentine wheat cultivars. Crop Sci 38:1203–1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Badaruddin M, Reynolds MP, Ageeb OAA (1999) Wheat management in warm environments: effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers, irrigation frequency, and mulching. Agron J 91:975–983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jeuffroy M, Bouchard C (1999) Intensity and duration of nitrogen deficiency on wheat grain number. Crop Sci 39:1385–1393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Donmez E, Sears R, Shroyer J, Paulsen G (2001) Genetic gain in yield attributes of winter wheat in the great plains. Crop Sci 41:1412–1419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Reynolds MP, Calderini DF, Condon AG, Rajaram S (2001) Physiological basis of yield gains in wheat associated with the LR19 translocation from Agropyron elongatum. Euphytica 119:139–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brancourt-Hulmel M, Doussinault G, Lecomte C, Bérard P, Le Buanec B, Trottet M (2003) Genetic improvement of agronomic traits of winter wheat cultivars released in France from 1946 to 1992. Crop Sci 43:37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Martín I, Tenorio JL, Ayerbe L (1994) Yield, growth, and water use of conventional and semileafless peas in semiarid environments. Crop Sci 34:1576–1583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Poggio SL, Satorre EH, Dethiou S, Gonzalo GH (2005) Pod and seed numbers as a function of photothermal quotient during the seed set period of field pea (Pisum sativum) crops. Eur J Agron 22:55–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Uzun A, Bilgili U, Sincik M, Filya I, Acikgoz E (2005) Yield and quality of forage type pea lines of contrasting leaf types. Eur J Agron 22:85–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sadras VO, Slafer GA (2012) Environmental modulation of yield components in cereals: heritabilities reveal a hierarchy of phenotypic plasticities. Field Crop Res 127:215–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Slafer GA, Savin R, Sadras VO (2014) Coarse and fine regulation of wheat yield components in response to genotype and environment. Field Crop Res 157:71–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    MacArthur R, Wilson EO (1967) The theory of island biogeography (2001 reprint ed). Princeton University Press, Princeton. ISBN 0-691-08836-5
  33. 33.
    Fischer RA (1985) Number of kernels in wheat crops and the influence of solar radiation and temperature. J Agric Sci 105:447–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Savin R, Slafer GA (1991) Shading effects on the yield of an Argentinian wheat cultivar. J Agric Sci 116:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Arisnabarreta S, Miralles D (2008) Critical period for grain number establishment of near isogenic lines of two- and six-rowed barley. Field Crop Res 107:196–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Estrada-Campuzano G, Miralles D, Slafer GA (2008) Yield determination in triticale as affected by radiation in different development phases. Eur J Agron 28:597–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cantagallo JE, Medan D, Hall AJ (2004) Grain number in sunflower as affected by shading during floret growth, anthesis and grain setting. Field Crop Res 85:191–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Jiang H, Egli DB (1993) Shade induced changes in flower and pod number and flower and fruit abscission in soybean. Agron J 85:221–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Board J, Tan Q (1995) Assimilatory capacity effects on soybean yield components and pod number. Crop Sci 35:846–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lake L, Sadras VO (2014) The critical period for yield determination in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Field Crop Res 168:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sandaña P, Calderini DF (2012) Comparative assessment of the critical period for grain yield determination of narrow-leafed lupin and pea. Eur J Agron 40:94–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Mahadevan M, Calderini DF, Zwer PK, Sadras VO (2016) The critical period for yield determination in oat (Avena sativa L.) Field Crop Res 199:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Dreccer FM, Fainges J, Whish J, Ogbonnaya F, Sadras VO (2018) Comparison of sensitive stages of wheat, barley, canola, chickpea and field pea to temperature and water stress across Australia. Agric For Meteorol 248:275–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ortiz-Monasterio JI, Dhillon SS, Fischer RA (1994) Date of sowing effects on grain yield and yield components of irrigated spring wheat cultivars and relationship with radiation and temperature in Ludhiana, India. Field Crop Res 37:169–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Calderini DF, Reynolds MP (2000) Changes in grain weight as a consequence of de-graining treatments at pre- and post-anthesis in synthetic hexaploid lines of wheat (Triticum durum × T. tauschii). Aust J Plant Physiol 27:183–191Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lizana CX, Calderini DF (2013) Yield and grain quality of wheat in response to increased temperatures at key periods for grain number and grain weight determination: considerations for the climatic change scenarios of Chile. J Agric Sci 151:209–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kobata T, Palta JA, Tanaka T, Ohnishi M, Maeda M, KoÇ M, Barutçular C (2017) Responses of grain filling in spring wheat and temperate-zone rice to temperature: similarities and differences. Field Crop Res 215:187–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Parent B, Bonneau J, Maphosa L, Kovalchuk A, Langridge P, Fleury D (2017) Quantifying wheat sensitivities to environmental constraints to dissect genotype × environment interactions in the field. Plant Physiol 174:1669–1682CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sandaña P, Harcha CI, Calderini DF (2009) Sensitivity of yield and grain nitrogen concentration of wheat, lupin and pea to source reduction during grain filling. A comparative survey under high yielding conditions. Field Crop Res 114:233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Slafer GA, Kantolic AG, Appendino ML, Miralles DJ, Savin R (2009) Crop development: genetic control, environmental modulation and relevance for genetic improvement of crop yield. In: Sadras VO, Calderini DF (eds) Crop physiology: applications for genetic improvement and agronomy. Academic, San Diego, pp 277–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Andrade FH, Uhart SA, Frugone MI (1993) Intercepted radiation at flowering and kernel number in maize: shade versus plant density effects. Crop Sci 33:482–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Otegui ME, Bonhomme R (1998) Grain yield components in maize – I. Ear growth and kernel set. Field Crop Res 56:247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Borrás L, Slafer GA, Otegui ME (2004) Seed dry weight response to source–sink manipulations in wheat, maize and soybean: a quantitative reappraisal. Field Crop Res 86:131–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Cartelle J, Pedró A, Savin R, Slafer GA (2006) Grain weight responses to post-anthesis spikelet-trimming in an old and a modern wheat under Mediterranean conditions. Eur J Agron 25:365–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Slafer GA, Savin R (1994) Source–sink relationships and grain mass at different positions within the spike in wheat. Field Crop Res 37:39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Asseng S, Kassie BT, Labra MH, Amador C, Calderini DF (2017) Simulating the impact of source–sink manipulations in wheat. Field Crop Res 202:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Munier-Jolain NG, Munier-Jolain NM, Roche R, Ney B, Duthion C (1998) Seed growth rate in grain legumes I. Effect of photoassimilate availability on seed growth rate. J Exp Bot 49:1963–1969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Palta JA, Ludwig C (1998) Yield response of narrow-leafed lupin plants to variations in pod number. Aust J Agric Res 49:63–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Lhuillier-Soundélé A, Munier-Jolain NG, Ney B (1999) Dependence of seed nitrogen concentration on plant nitrogen availability during the seed filling in pea. Eur J Agron 11:157–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Castillo FM, Vásquez SC, Calderini DF (2017) Does the pre-flowering period determine the potential grain weight of sunflower? Field Crop Res 212:23–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Munier-Jolain NG, Ney B (1998) Seed growth rate in grain legumes II. Seed growth rate depends on cotyledon cell number. J Exp Bot 49:1971–1976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Quintero A, Molero G, Reynolds MP, Calderini DF (2018) Trade-off between grain weight and grain number in wheat depends on GxE interaction: A case study of an elite CIMMYT panel (CIMCOG). Eur J Agron 92:17–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Kiniry JR, Ritchie JT (1985) Shade-sensitive interval of kernel number of maize. Agron J 77: 711–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIA-RemehueOsornoChile
  2. 2.Institute of Plant Production and Protection, Universidad Austral de ChileValdiviaChile

Section editors and affiliations

  • Roxana Savin
    • 1
  • Gustavo Slafer
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Crop and Forest Sciences and AGROTECNIO, (Center for Research in Agrotechnology)University of LleidaLleidaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Crop and Forest SciencesUniversity of LleidaLleidaSpain