Abstract
Primary care practice varies hugely from place to place. This chapter starts with establishing the existence of medical practice variation in primary care presenting some remarkable examples from the abundance of existing literature, which demonstrates variation in primary care practice at all levels: between countries, within countries across regions, and between practices.
The chapter will discuss how the visibility and transparency of clinical behavior in combination with shared resources is an important stepping-stone to understand how a “local practice style” evolves. We will explore whether or not these factors influence decisions on prescription, referrals, diagnostics, treatment, and advice. It is suggested that when clinical behavior is made transparent to colleagues and decision making is shared with patients or when shared resources are used, GPs working in the same practice behave more alike.
Finally, it is hypothesized that gatekeeping by GP’s helps (or should help) to reduce unwarranted variation in secondary care. The evidence in the literature that actually supports this is scarce and disappointing. Despite the crucial and pivotal role of GPs in many Western countries, substantial variation in the utilization of unnecessary or unwarranted elective surgery and/or hospital treatments is observed that could be avoidable if professional guidance was adhered to by GPs. At present Dutch GPs do not seem to be capable of avoiding unnecessary hospital care if they feel that it does not add to a patient’s value.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abbott S, et al. NHS purchaser–provider relationships in England and Wales: the view from primary care. Soc Policy Admin. 2009;43:1–14.
Baker R, Lecouturier J, Bond S. Explaining variation in GP referral rates for x-rays for back pain. Implement Sci. 2006;1:15.
Boerma WGW, Fleming DM. The role of general practice in primary health care. World Health Organization. London: The Stationary Office; 1998.
Butler CC, Hood K, Verheij T, Little P, Melbye H, Nuttall J, Kelly MJ, Mölstad S, Godycki-Cwirko M, Almirall J, Torres A, Gillespie D, Rautakorpi U, Coenen S, Goossens H. Variation in antibiotic prescribing and its impact on recovery in patients with acute cough in primary care: prospective study in 13 countries. BMJ. 2009;338(7710):1545–8. doi:10.1136/bmj.b2242 (Published 24 June 2009).
Corallo AN, et al. A systematic review of medical practice variation in OECD countries. Health Policy. 2013;114:5–14.
DaSilva P. A report on a piece of structured research. (Submitted in part fulfilment of DBA programme at Nottingham Trent University, unpublished.); 2013.
de Jong JD, Groenewegen PP, Westert GP. Mutual influences of general practitioners in partnerships. Soc Sci Med. 2003;57:1515–24.
Department of Health. Equality and excellence: liberating the NHS. London: DH; 2010.
Department of Health. NHS Atlas of variation compendium 2. London: DH. www.rightcare.nhs.uk; 2011.
Evans RG. The dog in the night time: medical practice variations and health policy. In: Andersen TF, Mooney G, editors. The challenges of medical practice variations. London: The Macmillan Press; 1990. p. 117–52.
Faber M, van Loenen T, van den Berg M, Westert G. Huisarts kan zorg betaalbaarder maken. Medisch Contact. 2012;46:2574–6.
Freidson E. Profession of medicine. A study of the sociology of applied knowledge. New York: Dodd, Mead; 1975.
Groenewegen PP, Dixon J, Boerma WGW. The regulatory environment of general practice: an international perspective. In: Saltman RB, Busse R, Mossialos E, editors. Regulating entrepreneurial behaviour in European health care systems. Buckingham: Open University press; 2002. p. 200–14.
Grimshaw J, Freemantle N, Wallace S, Russell I, Hurwitz B, Watt I, Long A, Sheldon T. Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines. Qual Health Care. 1995;4(1):55–64.
Ireri S, et al. A qualitative and quantitative study of medical leadership and management: experiences, competencies, and development needs of doctor managers in the United Kingdom. J Manag Market Healthc. 2011;4:16–29.
Jong JD, de Groenewegen PP, Westert GP. Medical practice variation: does it cluster within general practitioners’ practices? In: Westert GP, Jabaaij L, Schellevis FG, editors. Morbidity, performance and quality in primary care. Oxford/Seattle: Radcliffe publishing; 2006.
Kennedy PJ, Leathley CM, Hughes CF. Clinical practice variation. Med J Aust. 2010;193(8 Suppl):S97–9.
Lazega E. The collegial phenomenon. The social mechanisms of cooperation among peers in a corporate law partnership. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
Lugtenberg M, et al. Perceived barriers to guideline adherence: a survey among general practitioners. BMC Fam Pract. 2011;12:98.
Lumbreras B, López-Garrigos M, Salinas M. Variation in prostate specific antigen (PSA) test ordering in primary care centers: tendencies 2002–2009. Clin Lab. 2012;58(5–6):573–7.
Rashidian A, Eccles MP, Russell I. Falling on stony ground? A qualitative study of implementation of clinical guidelines’ prescribing recommendations in primary care. Health Policy. 2008;85(2):148–61. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
Schoen C, Osborn R, Squires D, et al. A survey of primary care doctors in ten countries shows progress in use of health information technology, less in other areas. Health affairs. 2012;31(12):2805–2816.
Shackelton-Piccolo R, McKinlay JB, Marceau LD, Goroll AH, Link CL. Differences between internists and family practitioners in the diagnosis and management of the same patient with coronary heart disease. Med Care Res Rev. 2011;68(6):650–66. doi:10.1177/1077558711409047 Epub 2011 Jun 16.
Smith JA, Mays N. GP led commissioning: time for a cool appraisal. Br Med J. 2012;344:e980.
Spallek H, et al. Barriers to implementing evidence-based clinical guidelines: a survey of early adopters. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2010;10:195–206.
Spyridonidis D, Calnan M. Are new forms of professionalism emerging in medicine? The case of the implementation of NICE guidelines. Health Soc Rev. 2011;20:394–409.
van den MJ B, de Bakker DH, Spreeuwenberg P, Westert GP, Braspenning JC, van der Zee J, Groenewegen PP. Labour intensity of guidelines may have a greater effect on adherence than GPs’ workload. BMC Fam Pract. 2009;10:74.
van Dijk CE, Korevaar JC, de Jong JD, Koopmans B, van Dijk M, de Bakker DH. Kennisvraag: ruimte voor substitutie? Verschuivingen van tweedelijns- naar eerstelijnszorg. Utrecht: NIVEL; 2013. 109 p.
Vedsted P, Sørensen HT, Nielsen J, Olesen F. Variation in proportion of frequent attenders between Danish general practices. Scand J Public Health. 2004;32(3):188–93.
Verstappen WHJM, Van der Weijden T, Sijbrandij J, Smeele I, Hermsen J, Grimshaw J, Grol RPTM. Effect of a practice-based strategy on test ordering performance of primary care physicians. JAMA. 2003;289:2407–12.
Wammes JJG, Verhoef L, Westert GP, Assendelft P, Jeurissen PP, Faber M. Onnodige zorg in de Nederlandse gezondheidszorg, gezien vanuit het perspectief van de huisarts. Celsus Academie voor Betaalbare Zorg, UMC St Radboud/ VWS, 2013.
Wennberg JE. Understanding geographic variations in health care delivery. New Engl J Med. 1999;340:52–3.
Westert GP. Variation in use of hospital care [dissertation]. Assen: Van Gorcum; 1992.
Zorgverzekeraars Nederland: https://zn-assets.zn.nl/p/32768/files/Praktijkvariatierapport%207%20electieve%20zorg%20aandoeningen.pdf. Accessed 27 Jan 2015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this entry
Cite this entry
Westert, G.P., de Jong, J.D., da Silva, P. (2016). Medical Practice Variations in Primary Care. In: Johnson, A., Stukel, T. (eds) Medical Practice Variations. Health Services Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7603-1_74
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7603-1_74
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-7602-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7603-1
eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine