Skip to main content

Medical Practice Variations in Elective Surgery

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Health Services Research ((HEALTHSR))

Abstract

The study of variations in elective surgery may be considered a paradigm within the field of medical practice variations. It was the focus of the first seminal work on unwarranted variations where the initial insights and first major hypotheses regarding medical practice variations were based on patterns of variations seen in rates of elective procedures. The taxonomy regarding the underlying causes of variations was largely built upon elective surgery. The current debate on policy implications is populated with numerous examples of elective procedures.

Stemming from work by Glover, Wennberg, Gittelsohn, and McPherson and based on a comprehensive literature review, this chapter is aimed at characterizing variations in elective surgery. The chapter presents the current evidence on variations, describing and interpreting the factors affecting variations in the rates of elective procedures and highlighting lessons expected to have immediate implications for health policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   279.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

General

  • Bernal-Delgado E. How can we improve effectiveness (quality) by reducing the gap between research and action? Gac Sanit. 2008;22 Suppl 1:19–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernal-Delgado E, García-Armesto S, Peiró S, Atlas VPM Group. Atlas of variations in medical practice in Spain: the Spanish National Health Service under scrutiny. Health Policy. 2014;114(1):15–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bohmer G, Pain P, Watt C, et al. Maximising health gain within available resources in the New Zealand public health system. Health Policy. 2001;55:37–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elshaug AG, Hiller JE, Tunis SR, Moss JR. Challenges in Australia policy processes for disinvestment from existing, ineffective health care practices. Australia and New Zealand. Health Policy. 2007;4:23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elshaug AG, Watt AM, Moss JR, et al. Policy perspectives on the obsolescence of health technologies in Canada. In: Discussion paper Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health for the Health Technology Strategy Policy Forum. CADTH. 2009. http://www.cadth.ca/media/policy_forum_section/Obsolescence%20of%20Health%20Technologies%20in%20Canada_Policy_Forum_e.pdf. Accessed 18 Apr 2013.

  • Espallargues M. Necesidades y priorización. Jornada sobre artroplastias: perspectivas clínicas, de gestión y de investigación en servicios sanitarios. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo y Red IRYSS. Madrid, 2 de junio 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Armesto S, Campillo-Artero C, Bernal-Delgado E. Disinvestment in the age of cost-cutting sound and fury. Tools for the Spanish National Health System. Health Policy. 2013;32:180–85. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.01.007. Accessed 18 Apr 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover JA. The incidence of tonsillectomy in school children. Proc R Soc Med. 1938;31(1219):95–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibáñez-Beroiz B, Librero-López J, Peiró-Moreno S, et al. Shared component modelling as an alternative to assess geographical variations in medical practice: gender inequalities in hospital admissions for chronic diseases. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011;11:172.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ibargoyen-Roteta N, Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea I, Asua J. Guiding the process of health technology disinvestment. Health Policy. 2010;98:218–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, Hur K, Demakis J, Aust JB, et al. The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 1998;228(4):491–507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson K, Wennberg JE, Hovind OB, et al. Small-area variations in the use of common surgical procedures: an international comparison of New England, England, and Norway. N Engl J Med. 1982;307:1310–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson K, Gon G, Scott M. International variations in a selected number of surgical procedures. OECD health working papers. 2013. doi:10.1787/5k49h4p5g9mw-en. Accessed 18 Apr 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • NICE. Prostate cancer: diagnosis and treatment. 2008. http://www.nice.org.uk/CG058. Accessed 18 Apr 2013.

  • NICE. Prosthetic intervertebral disc replacement in the lumbar spine. 2009. http://guidance.nice.org.uk/IPG306. Accessed 18 Apr 2013.

  • Nuti S, Vainieri M, Bonini A. Disinvestment for re-allocation: a process to identify priorities in healthcare. Health Policy. 2010;95:137–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. Health at a glance 2011: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. 2011. doi:10.1787/health_glance-2011-en. Accessed 18 Apr 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridao-López M, García-Armesto S, Peiró S, et al. Evaluación de la variabilidad geográfica de la práctica médica como herramienta de evaluación de políticas sanitarias. Presupuesto y Gasto Público. 2012;68:193–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salive ME, Mayfield JA, Weissman NW. Patient Outcomes Research Teams and the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Health Serv Res. 1990;25(5):697–708.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Varnauskas E. Twelve-year follow-up of survival in the randomized European Coronary Surgery Study. N Engl J Med. 1988;319(6):332–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veroff D, Marr A, Wennberg D. Enhanced support for shared decision making reduced costs of care for patients with preference-sensitive conditions. Health Aff. 2013;32:285–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wennberg JE. Small area analysis and the medical care outcome problem. In: Sechest L, Perren E, Bunker J, editors. AHCPR conference proceedings: research methodology strengthening causal interpretations of non-experimental data. Rockville: DHSS Publications; 1990. p. 90–3454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wennberg JE, Gittelsohn A. Health care delivery in Maine (I): patterns of use of common surgical procedures. J Maine Med Assoc. 1975;66:123–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wennberg JE, Barnes BA, Zubkoff M. Professional uncertainty and the problem of supplier-induced demand. Soc Sci Med. 1982;16(7):811–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wennberg JE, Cooper MM, et al. The quality of medical care in the United States: the Dartmouth Atlas of Health Care 1999. Chicago: American Hospital Publishing; 1999. p. 224–7.

    Google Scholar 

Tonsillectomy

  • Erickson BK, Larson DR, St Sauver JL, et al. Changes in incidence and indications of tonsillectomy and adenotonsillectomy, 1970–2005. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;140:894–901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fedeli U, Marchesan M, Avossa F, et al. Variability of adenoidectomy/tonsillectomy rates among children of the Veneto Region, Italy. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs K, Jorissen M, Lemkens P. Current Belgian adenotonsillectomy practice: a survey among Belgian ENT specialists. B-ENT. 2010;6:83–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lock C, Wilson J, Steen N, et al. Childhood tonsillectomy: who is referred and what treatment choices are made? Baseline findings from the North of England and Scotland Study of Tonsillectomy and Adenotonsillectomy in Children (NESSTAC). Arch Dis Child. 2010;95:203–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Materia E, Di Domenicantonio R, Baglio G, et al. Epidemiology of tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy in Italy. Pediatr Med Chir. 2004;26:179–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van den Akker EH, Schilder AG, Kemps YJ, et al. Current indications for (adeno)tonsillectomy in children: a survey in The Netherlands. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2003;67:603–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Staaij BK, van den Akker EH, Rovers MM, et al. Effectiveness of adenotonsillectomy in children with mild symptoms of throat infections or adenotonsillar hypertrophy: open, randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2004;329:651.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cesarean Section

  • Baicker K, Buckles KS, Chandra A. Geographic variation in the appropriate use of cesarean delivery. Health Aff. 2006;25:355–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carayol M, Blondel B, Zeitlin J, et al. Changes in the rates of caesarean delivery before labour for breech presentation at term in France: 1972–2003. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007;132:20–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CS, Lin HC, Liu TC, et al. Urbanization and the likelihood of a cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008;141:104–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark SL, Belfort MA, Hankins GD, et al. Variation in the rates of operative delivery in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:526. e1–e5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fairley L, Dundas R, Leyland AH. The influence of both individual and area based socioeconomic status on temporal trends in Caesarean sections in Scotland 1980–2000. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:330.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Freitas PF, Drachler Mde L, Leite JC, et al. Inequalities in cesarean delivery rates by ethnicity and hospital accessibility in Brazil. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;107:198–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grytten J, Monkerud L, Sørensen R. Adoption of diagnostic technology and variation in caesarean section rates: a test of the practice style hypothesis in Norway. Health Serv Res. 2012;47:2169–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley GE, Janssen PA, Greyson D. Regional variation in the cesarean delivery and assisted vaginal delivery rates. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115:1201–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Márquez-Calderón S, Ruiz-Ramos M, Juárez S, et al. Caesarean delivery in Andalusia, Spain: relationship with social, clinical and health services factors (2007–2009). Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2011;85:205–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hysterectomy

  • Abenhaim HA, Azziz R, Hu J, et al. Socioeconomic and racial predictors of undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy for selected benign diseases: analysis of 341487 hysterectomies. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15:11–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann K, Iosifidis P, Shorne L, et al. Effects of variations in hysterectomy status on population coverage by cervical screening. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2003;27:507–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bottle A, Aylin P. Variations in vaginal and abdominal hysterectomy by region and trust in England. BJOG. 2005;112:326–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Domenighetti G, Luraschi P, Casabianca A, et al. Effect of information campaign by the mass media on hysterectomy rates. Lancet. 1988;2:1470–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanstede MM, Burger MJ, Timmermans A, et al. Regional and temporal variation in hysterectomy rates and surgical routes for benign diseases in the Netherlands. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012;91:220–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby VL, Vittinghoff E, Nakagawa S, et al. Factors associated with undergoing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign conditions. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113:1259–67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen SL, Daugbjerg SB, Gimbel H, et al. Steering Committee of Danish Hysterectomy Database. Use of vaginal hysterectomy in Denmark: rates, indications and patient characteristics. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90:978–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peiró S, Meneu R, Bernal-Delgado E. Effectiveness, variation and inequalities. Hysterectomies and prostatectomies due to neoplasm in Spain (2002–2004). Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2009;83:109–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ribeiro SC, Ribeiro RM, Santos NC, et al. A randomized study of total abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003;83:37–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Twijnstra AR, Blikkendaal MD, van Zwet EW, et al. Predictors of successful surgical outcome in laparoscopic hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol. 2012;119:700–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Prostatectomy

  • Bañez LL, Terris MK, Aronson WJ, et al. Race and time from diagnosis to radical prostatectomy: does equal access mean equal timely access to the operating room? Results from the SEARCH database. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:1208–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hayen A, Smith DP, Patel MI, et al. Patterns of surgical care for prostate cancer in NSW, 1993–2002: rural/urban and socio-economic variation. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2008;32:417–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayn MH, Orom H, Shavers VL, et al. Racial/ethnic differences in receipt of pelvic lymph node dissection among men with localized/regional prostate cancer. Cancer. 2011;117:4651–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Nambudiri VE, Landrum MB, Lamont EB, et al. Understanding variation in primary prostate cancer treatment within the Veterans Health Administration. Urology. 2012;79:537–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver SE, Donovan JL, Peters TJ, et al. Recent trends in the use of radical prostatectomy in England: the epidemiology of diffusion. BJU Int. 2003;91:331–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trinh QD, Schmitges J, Sun M, et al. Improvement of racial disparities with respect to the utilization of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in the United States. Cancer. 2012;118:1894–900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilt TJ, Shamliyan TA, Taylor BC, et al. Association between hospital and surgeon radical prostatectomy volume and patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Urol. 2008;180:820–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Knee and Hip Replacement

  • Ackerman IN, Dieppe PA, March LM, et al. Variation in age and physical status prior to total knee and hip replacement surgery: a comparison of centers in Australia and Europe. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61:166–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bang H, Chiu YL, Memtsoudis SG, et al. Total hip and total knee arthroplasties: trends and disparities revisited. Am J Orthop. 2010;39:E95–102.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Racial disparities in total knee replacement among Medicare enrollees – United States, 2000–2006. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58:133–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobos R, Latorre A, Aizpuru F, et al. Variability of indication criteria in knee and hip replacement: an observational study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:249.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon T, Shaw ME, Dieppe PA. Analysis of regional variation in hip and knee joint replacement rates in England using Hospital Episodes Statistics. Public Health. 2006;120:83–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlop DD, Manheim LM, Song J, et al. Age and racial/ethnic disparities in arthritis-related hip and knee surgeries. Med Care. 2008;46:200–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Francis ML, Scaife SL, Zahnd WE, et al. Joint replacement surgeries among medicare beneficiaries in rural compared with urban areas. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;60:3554–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanchate AD, Zhang Y, Felson DT, et al. Exploring the determinants of racial and ethnic disparities in total knee arthroplasty: health insurance, income, and assets. Med Care. 2008;46:481–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins K, Escoto KH, Ozminkowski RJ, et al. Disparities in major joint replacement surgery among adults with Medicare supplement insurance. Popul Health Manag. 2011;14:231–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iorio R, Robb WJ, Healy WL, et al. Orthopaedic surgeon workforce and volume assessment for total hip and knee replacement in the United States: preparing for an epidemic. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1598–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Irgit K, Nelson CL. Defining racial and ethnic disparities in THA and TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:1817–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Judge A, Welton NJ, Sandhu J, et al. Geographical variation in the provision of elective primary hip and knee replacement: the role of socio-demographic, hospital and distance variables. J Public Health. 2009;31:413–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz SM, Ong KL, Schmier J, et al. Primary and revision arthroplasty surgery caseloads in the United States from 1990 to 2004. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:195–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laudicella M, Siciliani L, Cookson R. Waiting times and socioeconomic status: evidence from England. Soc Sci Med. 2012;74:1331–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mäkelä KT, Peltola M, Häkkinen U, et al. Geographical variation in incidence of primary total hip arthroplasty: a population-based analysis of 34,642 replacements. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130:633–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ong K, Lau E, Manley M, et al. Patient, hospital, and procedure characteristics influencing total hip and knee arthroplasty procedure duration. J Arthroplasty. 2009;24:925–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quintana JM, Escobar A, Arostegui I, et al. Health-related quality of life and appropriateness of knee or hip Joint replacement. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:220–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MM, Kopec JA, Sayre EC, et al. Effect of sociodemographic factors on surgical consultations and hip or knee replacements among patients with osteoarthritis in British Columbia. Canada J Rheumatol. 2011;38:503–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner J, Weinstein JN, Sporer SM, et al. Racial, ethnic, and geographic disparities in rates of knee arthroplasty among Medicare patients. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1350–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Suarez-Almazor ME, Souchek J, Kelly PA, et al. Ethnic variation in knee replacement: patient preferences or uninformed disparity? Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:1117–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tomek IM, Sabel AL, Froimson MI, et al. A collaborative of leading health systems finds wide variations in total knee replacement delivery and takes steps to improve value. Health Aff. 2012;31:1329–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Cardiac Revascularization

  • Aguado-Romeo MJ, Márquez-Calderón S, Buzón-Barrera ML, et al. Hospital mortality in acute coronary syndrome: differences related to gender and use of percutaneous coronary procedures. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:110.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Alter DA, Tu JV, Austin PC, Naylor CD. Waiting times, revascularization modality, and outcomes after acute myocardial infarction at hospitals with and without on-site revascularization facilities in Canada. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(3):410–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aragam KG, Moscucci M, Smith DE, et al. Trends and disparities in referral to cardiac rehabilitation after percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J. 2011;161:544–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Austin D, Oldroyd KG, McConnachie A, et al. Hospital and operator variations in drug-eluting stent use: a multi-level analysis of 5967 consecutive patients in Scotland. J Public Health. 2008;30:186–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bao Y, Kamble S. Geographical distribution of surgical capabilities and disparities in the use of high-volume providers: the case of coronary artery bypass graft. Med Care. 2009;47:794–802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown CP, Ross L, Lopez I, et al. Disparities in the receipt of cardiac revascularization procedures between blacks and whites: an analysis of secular trends. Ethn Dis. 2008;18(2 Suppl 2). S2-112-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caillier JG. Race, gender, and cardiovascular disease: do disparities exist at hospitals that serve majority black populations when patients present with ischemic heart disease and myocardial infarction? J Cult Divers. 2006;13:202–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coumbe A, John R, Kuskowski M, et al. Variation of mortality after coronary artery bypass surgery in relation to hour, day and month of the procedure. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2011;11:63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cram P, Bayman L, Popescu I, et al. Racial disparities in revascularization rates among patients with similar insurance coverage. J Natl Med Assoc. 2009;101:1132–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel Steg P, Iung B, Feldman LJ, et al. Determinants of use and outcomes of invasive coronary procedures in acute coronary syndromes: results from ENACT. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:613–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaglia Jr MA, Steinberg DH, Pinto Slottow TL, et al. Racial disparities in outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents. Am J Cardiol. 2009;103:653–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gaglia Jr MA, Torguson R, Xue Z, et al. Insurance type influences the use of drug-eluting stents. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010;3:773–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grilli R, Guastaroba P, Taroni F. Effect of hospital ownership status and payment structure on the adoption and use of drug-eluting stents for percutaneous coronary interventions. CMAJ. 2007;176:185–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan EL, Wu C, Chassin MR. Differences in per capita rates of revascularization and in choice of revascularization procedure for eleven states. BMC Health Serv Res. 2006;6:35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan EL, Racz M, Walford G, et al. Differences in utilization of drug-eluting stents by race and payer. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:1192–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kamble S, Boyd AS. Health disparities and social determinants of health among African-American women undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). J Cult Divers. 2008;15:132–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kilbourne BJ, Levine RS, Lambert W, et al. Geographic variations in percutaneous coronary interventions and coronary artery bypass graft surgery among Tennessee elders. South Med J. 2011;104:389–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim DH, Daskalakis C, Lee AN, et al. Racial disparity in the relationship between hospital volume and mortality among patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Surg. 2008;248:886–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Korda RJ, Clements MS, Dixon J. Socioeconomic inequalities in the diffusion of health technology: uptake of coronary procedures as an example. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72:224–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Likosky DS, Goldberg JB, DiScipio AW, et al. Variability in surgeons’ perioperative practices may influence the incidence of low-output failure after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012;5:638–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lin GA, Dudley RA, Redberg RF. Why physicians favor use of percutaneous coronary intervention to medical therapy: a focus group study. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:1458–63.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers BM, Vira T, Chow C, et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery and primary percutaneous coronary intervention choices in patients with similar coronary anatomy: a computer-based simulation examines the sex gap. Can J Cardiol. 2009;25:649–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Movahed MR, Ramaraj R, Jamal MM, et al. Nationwide trends in the utilisation of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the United States of America based on gender and ethnicities. EuroIntervention. 2009;5:343–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mukamel D, Glance L, Weimer D, et al. Racial variations in the choice of on-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2007;12:31–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee D, Wainess RM, Dimick JB, et al. Variation in outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States and predictors of periprocedural mortality. Cardiology. 2005;103:143–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Napan S, Kashinath R, Orig M, et al. Racial difference in cardiovascular outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention in a public health service patient population. J Invasive Cardiol. 2010;22:168–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Noguchi H, Shimizutani S, Masuda Y. Regional variations in medical expenditure and hospitalization days for heart attack patients in Japan: evidence from the Tokai Acute Myocardial Study (TAMIS). Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2008;8:123–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quin JA, Sheng S, O’Brien SM, et al. Regional variation in patient risk factors and mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:1277–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riley RF, Don CW, Powell W, et al. Trends in coronary revascularization in the United States from 2001 to 2009: recent declines in percutaneous coronary intervention volumes. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2011;4:193–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Saleh SS, Hannan EL, Ting L. A multistate comparison of patient characteristics, outcomes, and treatment practices in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96:1190–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson CA, Kaplan AV, Friedman BJ, et al. Gender-based differences of percutaneous coronary intervention in the drug-eluting stent era. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006;67:25–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tu JV, Ko DT, Guo H, et al. Determinants of variations in coronary revascularization practices. CMAJ. 2012;184:179–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • West RM, Cattle BA, Bouyssie M, et al. Impact of hospital proportion and volume on primary percutaneous coronary intervention performance in England and Wales. Eur Heart J. 2011;32:706–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrique Bernal-Delgado .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this entry

Cite this entry

Bernal-Delgado, E., Ridao-López, M., Garcia-Armesto, S. (2016). Medical Practice Variations in Elective Surgery. In: Johnson, A., Stukel, T. (eds) Medical Practice Variations. Health Services Research. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7603-1_71

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7603-1_71

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-7602-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-7603-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics