Albedo Dichotomy or Color Dichotomy

  • Erzsébet Illés-AlmárEmail author
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9213-9_7-2

Keywords

Galilean Satellite Dark Material Equatorial Band Jovian Magnetosphere Equatorial Lens 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Definition

Albedo/color dichotomy occurs on a planetary surface, which is characterized by two spectrally different terrains of regional to hemispheric/global scale.

Synonyms

Category

A type of albedo feature

Formation

Albedo dichotomy may be related to partial coverage of the surface by liquids, frost, ices, fine-grained atmospheric dust, materials from space, or related to processes such as sublimation, high-energy particle impacts, differences in grain size, composition, or material age/maturity, etc.

Regional Variations

Moon

The Moon shows an albedo dichotomy of high-albedo terra/highland (impact ejecta) and low-albedo mare (Moon) (basaltic plains) surfaces.

Mars

The surface of Mars displays low-albedo terrains dominated by mafic sand-sized materials and high-albedo terrains covered by dust (Ruff and Christensen 2002; Albedo Feature: Mars).

Ganymede

Ganymede’s bimodal surface consists of young, bright, grooved terrain (Groove, Ganymede) and old, heavily cratered, furrowed, dark terrains (e.g., Galileo Regio) (Furrow, Icy Moon; Nimmo and Pappalardo 2004 and references therein) that are large scale but do not show hemispherical differences and occur in polygonal blocks (Murchie et al. 1990). The dark terrain exhibits heterogeneous albedo at small (dekameter) scale. Bright material, thought to be composed of clean water ice, is usually found at topographically high elevations (knobs and massifs), while dark material is typically found in topographic lows (dark plains). The coexistence of bright and dark material in topographic lows is most consistent with a clean ice substrate which is contaminated with dark material from early impacts. The dark material concentrates on dark plains as sublimation lag deposit and forms a thin veneer (Prockter et al. 1998).

Mid-Sized Saturnian Satellites

  1. (1)
    Hemispheric color and albedo asymmetries: Tethys (Fig. 1), Dione, and Rhea display double hemispheric asymmetries (Buratti et al. 1990; Schenk et al. 2011).
    1. (1.1)

      Trailing hemisphere: the center of the trailing hemisphere displays an increase in redness (IR/UV ratio) and decrease (darkening) in albedo, suggested to be produced by magnetospheric thermal plasma bombardment (charged-particle radiation; “magnetic sweeping”).

       
    2. (1.2)

      Leading hemisphere: similar but weaker enhancement is observed at the center of the leading hemisphere, produced by the bombardment of E-ring particles. These color features are not associated with any detectable albedo variation.

       

    These effects produce a visible difference between the crater walls facing toward the apex and the antapex (Schenk et al. 2011)

    On Enceladus, hemispheric reddening is offset by 40°, probably due to southern plume activity (Bright Plains (icy moons) Enceladus)

     
  2. (2)

    Equatorial lenses and equatorial band: a dark bluish equatorial band is observed across the leading hemisphere of both Tethys and Mimas (Fig. 2). Equatorial lenses are proposed to be produced by the impact of the most energetic particles whose motion is opposite to the motion of the inner satellites and therefore can collide with the leading hemispheres (Schenk et al. 2011).

     
  3. (3)
     
Fig. 1

Hemispheric color asymmetry of Tethys shown in IR–Green–UV filter global map. Trailing hemisphere shows a prominent albedo decrease, which coincides with a similar increase in IR/UV ratio (“redness”) (Schenk et al. 2011; Fig. 1)

Fig. 2

Global IR/UV color ratio (“redness”) map of Mimas, showing a lens-shaped feature across the leading hemisphere, similar in shape to the band on Tethys (Schenk et al. 2011; Fig. 2)

Iapetus

Cassini Regio on the leading side has very low albedo (0.06 on average with 0.02 for dark material), whereas the poles and the trailing side are relatively bright (0.25 on average with 0.38 for bright material; Blackburn et al. 2011) except for topographic lows. Albedo boundaries are very sharp (Figs. 3 and 4). A further dichotomy of a redder leading hemisphere and less red trailing hemisphere is also observed (Blackburn et al. 2011 and references therein).
Fig. 3

Global views of Iapetus showing Iapetus’ dichotomy. Left: leading hemisphere, right: trailing hemisphere. Cassini mosaics PIA11690 (NASA/JPL/Space Science Institute)

Fig. 4

Map of Iapetus from Cassini and Voyager images. PIA11116 (NASA/JPL/Space Science Institute)

Formation

The dichotomy may be caused by a thermal feedback process in which bright water ice sublimes, leaving behind a dark lag deposit (Galuba et al. 2012; Sublimation Landforms: differential sublimation due to albedo differences).

Dark material may originate from the following sources (Blackburn et al. 2011):
  1. (1)
    Endogenic models
    1. (1a)

      Volcanic flows/eruption. This model can be associated with the formation of Iapetus’ equatorial ridge.

       
    2. (1b)

      Geyser-like activity in connection with the equatorial compressional ridge producing the dark coating (Illés-Almár 2006).

       
     
  2. (2)
    Exogenic/external models
    1. (2.1)

      Exogenic coating (Soter 1974): dark materials are remnants of circum-Kronian dust deposits ejected from the low-albedo dust-covered outer irregular satellite Phoebe. This satellite orbits retrograde, and retrograde orbiting dust particles would impact Iapetus, which is prograde, at high velocities on its leading side (Tamayo et al. 2011).

       
     

The discovery of a dust ring at the orbit of Phoebe validated this model (Blackburn et al. 2011). It is also supported by the observation of dark materials concentrating on the leading hemisphere and independent of local morphology (Kimura et al. 2011 and references therein). However, this process would produce gradual changes at albedo boundaries that are inconsistent with observations that show sudden change at albedo boundaries (Tamayo et al. 2011 and references therein).

Furthermore this model would demand that the surface inside the entire cross section of the leading side, and only inside this cross section, should be dark, which is not the case (Illés-Almár 2006, 2012).

Europa

The surface of Europa exhibits two major terrain types: the bright ridged plains and the darker mottled terrains that form by the disruption of the ridged terrain (Pappalardo et al. 1999). The (mottled terrain (Europa)) on the leading hemisphere show yellowish color in VIS (yellow or high-UV mottled terrain), while those in the trailing hemisphere are brownish (brown or low-UV mottled terrain) (Denk et al. 1998). The difference is thought to be caused by differences in magnetospheric influences as high-energy particles impact or overtake Europa from behind (i.e., in the trailing hemisphere) due to the faster rotation of the Jovian magnetosphere than the orbital velocity of Europa (Johnson et al. 2004).

The purest H2O is found on the leading hemisphere (Carlson et al. 2009). The yellow hue in the leading hemisphere could be caused in part by the exogenic sulfur input from Io (Eviatar et al. 1981), while the sulfur could also be of endogenous (e.g., subsurface oceanic) origin (Spencer et al. 1995; Chaotic terrain (Europa)). The trailing hemisphere is darkened and reddened by the implantation of sulfur into the surface ices (Schenk et al. 2011).

Titan

Dark regions may be covered by hydrocarbon liquids (at polar areas) and particulate organic materials (near the equator); bright regions are “continents” at higher elevation (Porco et al. 2005 and references therein; Albedo feature Titan)

Terrestrial Analog

The surface of Earth is characterized by low-albedo water bodies (Jin et al. 2007) and medium albedo continents (Fig. 5; Albedo feature Terrestrial Analog).
Fig. 5

Dark and medium albedo surface markings on the surface of Earth. Very bright features are clouds. Clementine mosaic (US Naval Research Laboratory/Ballistic Missile Defense Organization)

History of Investigation

Galilean Satellites

Albedo asymmetries between the leading and trailing hemispheres of Europa and Ganymede were reported by Pilcher et al. (1973), and the dichotomy was observed by many others (Malin and Pieri 1986 and references therein).

Iapetus

Soon after its discovery by Cassini in 1671, Iapetus became so faint that it was lost and not recovered until the following year (See 1910, p. 352). See (1910) proposed that this hemispheric darkness is caused by features similar to lunar maria.

See Also

References

  1. Blackburn DG, Buratti BJ, Ulrich R (2011) A bolometric bond Albedo map of Iapetus: observations from Cassini VIMS and ISS and voyager ISS. Icarus 212:329–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buratti BJ, Mosher JA, Johnson TV (1990) Albedo and color maps of the Saturnian satellites. Icarus 87(2):339–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carlson RW, Calvin W, Dalton JB, Hansen G, Hudson R, Johnson RE, McCord TB, Moore MH (2009) Europa’s surface composition. In: Europa. Univeristy of Arizona Press, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  4. Denk T, Neukum G, Belton MJS, Breneman HH, Geissler PE, Greeley R, Hansen GB, Helfenstein P, Hibbitts CA, Jaumann R, Johnson TV, Martin PD, McCord TB, McEwen AS, Sullivan RJ, The Galileo SSI Team (1998) Europa’s colors, observed by Galileo-SSI: yellow mottled terrain on the leading side, brown mottled terrain on the trailing side. 39th Lunar Planet Sci, abstract # 1684, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  5. Eviatar A, Soscoe GL, Johnson TV, Matson DL (1981) Effects of Io ejecta on Europa. Icarus 47(1):75–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Galuba GG, Denk T, Neukum G (2012) Dark terrains on Iapetus: from the local to the global perspective and back. Lunar Planet Sci Conf 42, abstract #2153, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  7. Illés-Almár E (2006) On the origin of the dark material on Iapetus. Antarctic meteorites, vol XXX. National Institute of Polar Research, Tokyo, pp 33–34Google Scholar
  8. Illés-Almár E (2012) The most peculiar objects in the Saturnian system. In: Workshop on Mars – connecting planetary scientists in Europe, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  9. Jin Z, Charlock TP, Smith WL Jr, Rutlegde K (2007) A parameterization of ocean surface Albedo. Geophys Res Lett 31:L22301. doi:10.1029/2004GL021180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Johnson RE, Carlson RW, Cooper JF, Paranicas C, Moore MH, Wong MC (2004) Radiation effects on the surfaces of the Galilean satellites. In: Bagenal F, Dowling T, McKinnon W (eds) Jupiter: the planet, satellites and magnetosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 485–512Google Scholar
  11. Kimura J, Kawamura T, Morito H, Morota T, Honda C, Kuramoto K, Okada T (2011) Sublimation’s impact on temporal change of Albedo dichotomy on Iapetus. Icarus 214:596–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Malin MC, Pieri DC (1986) Europa. In: Burns JA, Matthews MS (eds) Satellites. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp 689–717Google Scholar
  13. Murchie SL, Head JW, Plescia JB (1990) Tectonic and volcanic evolution of dark terrain and its implications for the internal structure and evolution of Ganymede. J Geophys Res 95(B7):10743–10768. doi:10.1029/JB095iB07p10743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nimmo F, Pappalardo RT (2004) Furrow flexure and ancient heat flux on Ganymede. Geophys Res Lett 31:L19701. doi:10.1029/2004GL020763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pappalardo RT et al (1999) Does Europa have a subsurface ocean? Evaluation of the geological evidence. J Geophys Res E Planets 104:24015–24055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pilcher CB, Ridgeway ST, McCord TB (1973) Galilean satellites: identification of water frost. Science 178:1087–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Porco CC et al (2005) Imaging of Titan from the Cassini spacecraft. Nature 434:159–168. doi:10.1038/nature03436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Prockter LM, Head JW, Pappalardo RT, Senske DA, Neukum G et al (1998) Dark terrain on Ganymede: geological mapping and interpretation of Galileo Regio at high resolution. Icarus 135:317–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ruff SW, Christensen PR (2002) Bright and dark regions on Mars: particle size and mineralogical characteristics based on thermal emission spectrometer data. J Geophys Res 107(E12):5127. doi:10.1029/2001JE001580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schenk P, Hamilton DP, Johnson RE, McKinnon WB, Paranicas C, Schmist J, Showalter MR (2011) Plasma, plumes and rings: Saturn system dynamics as recorded in global color patterns on its midsize icy satellites. Icarus 211:740–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. See TJJ (1910) On the craters, mountains, Maria and other phenomena observed on the surface of the Moon, and on the indicated processes of planetary growth. In: Researches on the evolution of the stellar systems. II: the capture theory of cosmical evolution. Thos. P. Nichols, Lynn, Mas https://archive.org/details/researchesonevol02seetuoft
  22. Soter S (1974) IAU colloquium 28, Cornell University. Cited by Tamayo et al. (2011)Google Scholar
  23. Spencer JR, Calvin WM, Person MJ (1995) Charge-coupled-device spectra of the Galilean satellites: molecular oxygen on Ganymede. J Geophys Res 100:19049–19056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tamayo D, Burns JA, Hamilton DP, Hedman MM (2011) Finding the trigger to Iapetus’ odd global albedo pattern: dynamics of dust from Saturn’s irregular satellites. Icarus 215:260–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Konkoly Observatory of the Hungarian Academy of SciencesBudapestHungary