Alluvial Fan

  • Henrik HargitaiEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9213-9_466-1

Keywords

Debris Flow Rock Avalanche Fault Scarp Okavango Delta Lava Tube 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Definition

Subaerial alluvial fans are “cone-shaped or fan-shaped depositional landforms created due to loss of flow competence anywhere that a river (channelized flow) is released from confinement and discharge or environment conditions promote avulsion” (North and Davidson 2012).

Synonyms

Subaerial fan

Note

Sublacustrine/Submarine Fans” are discussed in a separate entry.

Description

Alluvial fans are gently sloping semi-conical fan-shaped ramps that radiate from steep mountain area drainage outlets emerging into low-relief basins (Moore and Howard 2005) of reduced stream power. The cone-shaped deposit is fan shaped in plan view (Bull 1977). Alluvial fans have a concave longitudinal profile and a convex transverse (cross-fan) profile. Alluvial fans in places have stream channels incised into the fan material (Lecce 1990*). Alluvial fans are different from alluvial plains in that in fans the fluvial system is distributary, whereas in plains it is through-flowing (Stainstreet and McCarthy 1993).

Subtypes

End members of possible fan types by process on Earth:
  1. (1)

    Stream-flow (fluidal/riverine flow) dominated fans characterized by <20 % sediment concentration, low, <20° slope gradient and braided channels (e.g., Kosi Fan)

     
  2. (2)

    Debris-flow dominated fans produced by hyperconcentrated and debris flows, with sediment and debris concentration >20 %, steeper slopes (>20°), characterized by boulder lined levees, boulder fields (Bull 1977) (e.g., Death Valley fans)

     
  3. (3)

    Low sinuosity/meandering (“losi-mean”) river dominated fluvial fans: ultra low-gradient slope, tens of km across, highly vegetated, with permanent swamps and vegetated levees that stabilize the positions of channels and meander belts (e.g., Okavango Fan) (Stainstreet and McCarthy 1993)

     
Fan types by morphology:
  • Alluvial fan: Fan-shaped stream deposits that occur on mountain foot plains or broad valley floors (Fig. 1b). They are found at the base of mountain slopes, proximal to valley or canyon mouths. Their gradient is generally <10–15° near the apex, <1–5° near the toe, but may reach the angle of repose (~32°). On Earth they may be up to >100 km or longer. They are composed of gravel and sand, immature and mature. The coarsest debris is found in the proximal zone. They are deposited by water flow (braided streams) or debris flows (Blikra and Nemec 1998). Flood events result in overland flow: shallow and rapid water flow across interfluves resulting in thin-bedded, high-energy deposits.

  • Alluvial cone: Small alluvial fan with steep, >20° slopes formed by fluvial deposition and mass wasting (Bull 1977), dominated by debris flow (Fig. 1a).

  • Alluvial ramp: A low-gradient alluvial fan (Moore and Howard 2005).

  • Bajada (alluvial apron): Depositional piedmont formed from expansion and coalescing of adjacent alluvial fans in semiarid environment. These are distinguished from pediment that is a superficially similar, erosional landform (Lecce 1990*). Pediments are also usually mantled with a veneer of debris, which can be called alluvium.

  • Megafan (also fluvial fan): Unusually large alluvial fans (Leier et al. 2005) (e.g., Kosi River Fan, India) (Gohain and Parkash 1990). They are characterized by channels that have a through-flow of water, and discharge is continuous into a channel downstream (Nichols and Fisher 2007).

  • Terminal fan: Fan in arid climate on Earth where non-floodwater flow percolates into the ground (Bridge and Demicco 2012, p. 448).

  • Inland delta (obs.): This term was originally used for the Okavango Delta (Okavango Fan), Botswana, whose bird’s-foot pattern led to this naming during the colonial period. “Such a classification cannot be maintained because the fan does not debouch into it major water body” (Stainstreet and McCarthy 1993). Kosi Fan, India, was also termed inland delta by Gole and Chitale (1966) and was later reclassified as alluvial fan. Biologists, however, give this term a new meaning: Thieme et al. (2005, p. 47) redefined it as “an area where a river slows and may divide as it enters a flat area or a standing body of water, and a broad area of seasonal or permanent wetland is created.”

  • Intracrater fan: see Regional variations.

Fig. 1

Alluvial cones and alluvial fans along the two opposing mountain ranges of the Badwater Basin in Death Valley, California. Coalesced alluvial cones form a continuous alluvial slope (bajada) along Panamint Range (to left), e.g., at Starvation Canyon (a). Black Mountain (Amargosa Range) alluvial fans (to right), e.g., at Copper Canyon (b), are smaller because these deposits are dropping down more rapidly along active faults and are being buried fast by playa sediments (Kiver and Harris 1999, p. 280) (Google Earth/USDA Farm Service Agency)

Fig. 2

Alluvial fan terminology (1) drainage basin in mountainous terrain; (2) fan apex/head; (3) incised channel; (4) intersection point; (5) active depositional lobe; (6) inactive fan lobes (debris flow lobes and levee deposits), distributary channels, and stream-flow channel deposits; (7) mountain front; (8) proximal fan; (9) mid-fan; (10) distal fan/fanbase/fantoe (playa, lake, floodplain, sand flat, etc) (After Hardie et al. (1978), Blair and McPherson (1994), North and Davidson (2012), and others)

Fig. 3

Alluvial fan adjacent to Lake Morari, Tibet. ISS013-E-76262 (4 September 2006) (NASA/ISS)

Formation

Alluvial fans are depositional landforms created where high-gradient, confined, sediment-laden streams empty subaerially onto low-gradient, unconfined surfaces (Hardgrove et al. 2009), a zone of reduced stream power (Harvey 2004). Flows decelerate and spread laterally due to change in gradient, triggering sediment deposition (Hugenholtz and Wan Bun Tseung 2007). Avulsion frequently occurs in initial channels and close to fan apex (but is also common further down) because of weakened levees. Channels incised at the fan head deposit sediments further down. Incision of channels depends on mountain uplift rates and sediment supply (Stainstreet and McCarthy 1993). Unconfined flows may develop into channeled flows or dissipate (infiltrate or evaporate). Alluvial fan deposition may be dominated by unconfined flows (e.g., in Death Valley) or by channeled flows (e.g., at Kosi River) (North and Davidson 2012).

Alluvial fans in many places form along high-angle faults (Burbank and Anderson 2011), but their formation does not necessarily require active tectonics and aridity (North and Davidson 2012). On Mars, they typically develop on the inner rim of impact craters (Kraal and Asphaug 2006).

Alluvial fans prograde by lobe building and lobe avulsion. Lobe switching leads to the map-view fan shape. Progradation results in a stratigraphy of coarsening-upward intervals truncated by abandonment, then buried by the next lobe-building cycle (Lecce 1990*). The rate at which alluvial fans grow is controlled by tectonic activity, climatic conditions, and rate of sediment supply (Zanchetta et al. 2004).

Processes active on alluvial fans are:
  1. 1.

    Primary processes transporting sediment from the drainage basin to the fan, resulting in fan construction or aggradation, manifested in the deposition of unique sediment lobes. Material of lobes is typically transported during intense runoff periods. Water may arrive at the drainage basin as rapid snowmelt-induced flash floods or intense cloudbursts (Moore and Howard 2005*). Processes involved are stream flow (channel and sheet floods) and mass wasting active in the drainage basin, for example, rockfalls, rock avalanches, landslides, debris flows, etc.

     
  2. 2.

    Secondary processes reworking previously deposited sediment (e.g., deflation, gullying, slope wash, piping, soil development, weathering, faulting, case hardening, bioturbation, etc.), resulting in fan erosion and degradation (Blair and McPherson 1994).

     

Age

Alluvial fan aggradation on Earth can span several hundred thousand years (Williams et al. 2011*). On Mars, pristine craters lack fluvial modifications (Grant and Wilson 2012). The age of craters with fans seems to be confined to one period in Martian history (Modified Crater) (Mangold et al. 2012). Assuming hillslope erosion in the presence of precipitation, formation of large Martian alluvial fans, could take >108 years (in hyperarid conditions), 107–108 years (in arid conditions), or 106 years (in semiarid to temperate conditions), depending on climate scenario (Armitage et al. 2011).

Degradation

Alluvial fans can be modified, e.g., by fan trenching (Harvey 1978), fan segmentation (Bull 1964), and faulting (Alexander and Coppola 1989).

Surface/Structural Units

Alluvial deposits: Alluvial fans can have a complex depositional history. Alluvial fans can develop multiple inset surfaces, with unique relief and height above the active channel, soil characteristics, rock coating (varnish), and degree of dissection (Ferrier and Pope 2012). The terms “alluvial deposits” and “alluvium” are poorly defined and loosely used in North America to give a name to unconsolidated debris such as found on alluvial fans and pediments. See also “Colluvium.” Once the sediment is buried, one may apply the appropriate rock name, i.e., conglomerate, diamictite, litharenite, etc.

Morphologic features of alluvial fans (Fig. 2):
Fig. 4

Location of large alluvial fans associated with crater rims on Mars studied by Kraal et al. (2008, Fig. 2)

  1. (1)

    Fan apex (fan head): the highest point of the fan where the feeder channel leaves its confinement (Lecce 1990*).

     
  2. (2)

    Incised channel: downslope extension of the feeder channel on the fan, commonly but not always present.

     
  3. (3)

    Fan intersection point: where the active incised channel emerges onto the fan. At this point the channel depth becomes zero and stream flow becomes unconfined below it (Hooke 1967).

     
  4. (4)

    Medial part of fan (mid-fan) with active and abandoned depositional lobes, where sediment aggradation occurs or have occurred.

     
  5. (5)

    Fan toe (the distal end of a fan): the intersection of an alluvial fan with its adjacent terrain (North and Davidson 2012).

     
  6. (6)

    Sandflat (Hardie et al. 1978) or distal-fan sandskirt (Blair and McPherson 1994) on stream-flow dominated fans: “flat unchannelled sandy apron at base of fan” where “floodwaters disperse as unchannelled, unconfined sheetfloods across a narrow flat (<1°slope) sand plain” that leads out to ephemeral lakes (Hardie et al. 1978). Type example: Copper Canyon fan, Death Valley. North and Davidson (2012) do not recommend the use of the term because of its ambiguity. This zone is also called floodout zone characterized by terminal floodouts (Tooth 1999) or terminal splays (Lang et al. 2004).

     
  7. (7)

    Additional units related to channels: distributary channels originating from the incised channel, headward eroding gullies at the distal part of fans that may eventually intersect the incised channel levees crevasse splays (Blair and McPherson 1994).

     
  8. (8)

    The fault scarp, characterized by talus cones.

     

Composition

Alluvial fan deposits can include talus, rock avalanche, and aeolian components. Deposits are coarse grained, poorly sorted due to short transport distance and mass wasting processes.

Distribution

Earth, Mars, and Titan. On Earth, alluvial fans can form in all climates and tectonic settings (North and Davidson 2012). They are typical in semiarid environments but also occur in humid landscapes (Rachocki and Church 1990). They are found in locations showing strong relief contrast (i.e., tectonically active mountain plains boundaries or crater rims), where emerging from a confining outlet, stream power is suddenly reduced (Fig. 3).
Fig. 5

Radar-bright linear features (Elivagar Flumina) interpreted as valleys terminating in alluvial fans and bajada on Titan. Features that are radar bright are on the scale of or larger than the radar wavelength (2.17 cm) and are interpreted as gravel-bed, braided, ephemeral rivers that terminate in alluvial deposits (Burr et al. 2012). Scale bar ca. 30 km. Cassini SAR observation T3 near 19°N, 77°W (NASA/JPL-Caltech/ASI)

On Mars, they are scattered across the cratered southern highlands (Grant and Wilson 2012), concentrating in southern Margaritifer Terra, southwestern Terra Sabaea, and southwestern Tyrrhena Terra (Kraal et al. 2008; Morgan et al. 2012) (Fig. 4). Lava tube-related fans were mapped on Olympus Mons by Richardson et al. (2009).
Fig. 6

Alluvial fans in a 63-km diameter central peak crater centered on 23.5°S, 74.3°E (Moore and Howard 2005; Fig. 5). Contrast-enhanced image. Scale bar 30 km. THEMIS day IR mosaic (NASA/JPL-Caltech/ASU)

On Titan, alluvial fans are found at low-mid latitudes (Jaumann et al. 2009; Radebaugh et al. 2013) (Fig. 5).
Fig. 7

Fan-shaped landform in Mojave Crater, Mars, near 7.4°N, 32.9°W (Williams and Malin 2008). Scale bar 200 m. MOC NA R06-01306 (NASA/JPL/MSSS)

Regional Variations

On Mars, inferred alluvial fans preferentially occur in the inside rim of impact craters (98 % of all alluvial fans mapped) (Fig. 6).
Fig. 8

Coalescing fans forming an apron (bajada) in Mojave Crater, Mars (Williams and Malin 2008). Scale bar 200 m. HiRISE PSP_002167_1880 (NASA/JPL/University of Arizona)

These intracrater fans originate from crater rim and deposit their apron into the crater floor (Kraal and Asphaug 2006). Fans extend 10–40 km downslope, descending >1 km with low gradient (2°). Many of them display long and narrow ridges radiating downslope interpreted as distributaries. Their steep gradient is suggestive of gravel-sized particles (Moore and Howard 2005).

Some of the alluvial fans on Mars apparently emplaced subaerially or into ephemeral or shallow body of water, while the steep-fronted ones may have emplaced into deeper standing water (e.g., in Eberswalde crater) (Grant and Wilson 2012).

In Margaritifer Terra, fans display series of ridges radiating from near their apex, interpreted to be inverted relief channels, resulted from differential erosion between channel and lobe materials that indicates aeolian erosion of exposed sand and possible silt-sized particles.

Sub-km-sized fans with branching tributary networks and channeled apron surfaces have been observed in Mojave crater (Williams et al. 2004) (Figs. 7 and 8).
Fig. 9

Lava tube-associated lava fan on the flank of Olympus Mons, Mars (Richardson et al. 2009). Scale bar 3 km. THEMIS VIS V12162005 (NASA/JPL-Caltech/Arizona State University)

Fig. 10

Lava fan (lobe) emanating from the western edge of the Artemis-Imdr festoon, Venus, at 37.5°S 167.4°E. Right-looking SAR C1-30S171, c1-45S159/Map-a-Planet Explorer. Scale bar 100 km (NASA/JPL/USGS)

These attributes are consistent with formation by overland flow of fluids. It is proposed that their formation is related to the crater forming impact event that may have generated water as atmospheric precipitation or liberated it from ground sources and sustained fluid flows for surface runoff (Williams and Malin 2008; Goddard et al. 2012). Water may have been related to post-outflow channel activity redistribution of water from the lowlands to the highlands.

Holden crater fans are interpreted to have resulted from sudden precipitation (snow) and runoff, which terminated suddenly (Moore and Howard 2005). Snow was possibly concentrated into crater rim depressions by the wind as snowdrifts (Grant and Wilson 2012).

In Harris Crater several fans show signatures of fluvial emplacement, while one fan unit exhibits boulders consistent with a debris flow; this suggests a decline in available water and/or change in sediment supply (Williams et al. 2011).

Apollinaris Patera has a giant, 200 km-long deeply incised fan structure on its southern flank, thought to be composed of low-viscosity lavas or pyroclastic deposits (Kerber et al. 2011). Ghail and Hutchinson (2003) interpret it as volcanoclastic sediments emplaced by repeated pyroclastic flows, receiving water from a snowfall-fed caldera lake.

On Titan, several radar-bright dry valleys (Titan) terminate in fan-shaped radar-bright features that may coalesce and are interpreted as alluvial fans and bajada. Radar brightness differences in a fan system may result from different particles sizes that may indicate long-term changes in depositional processes (Jaumann et al. 2009; Burr et al. 2012; Radebaugh et al. 2013) (e.g., fans of Leilah Flucus, Elivagar Flumina).

Significance

Alluvial fans help “characterize the amount and style of runoff responsible for their formation and to constrain the climate in which they formed” (Grant and Wilson 2012; Mangold et al. 2012). Fan morphologies are indicative of climate conditions, precipitation rates, and transport characteristics (Radebaugh et al. 2013). Alluvial fans represent the distal end of an erosion/deposition system. Transition from a fluvial system to alluvial fans indicates break in slope and thus reveals local topography.

Astrobiological Significance

Alluvial fans that formed dominantly by fluvial, not debris-flow processes, provide evidence of water that may include standing bodies of water. The landing area of the Curiosity mission is located in the vicinity of a large alluvial fan (the Peace Vallis fan) inside Gale crater where water-carried sediments have been found (Palucis et al. 2013).

Terrestrial Analog

Typical alluvial fans are found in the Death Valley, California, while the largest on Earth is the Koshi River alluvial fan in the southern foreland of the Himalaya. Hugenholtz and Wan Bun Tseung (2007) proposed that interdigitate patterns of lobate deposits on Martian alluvial fans resemble terrestrial debris-flow dominated fans, and small-scale debris-flow fans developed in unconsolidated sand deposits.

History of Investigation

Alluvial fans were first discussed by A. Surell in 1841 (Lecce 1990*). Debris-flow was first recognized as alluvial fan building process by Blackwelder (1928) (Blair and McPherson 1994*). The investigation of alluvial fans reflects paradigms and paradigm shifts in geomorphology. In the pre-paradigm period landforms were described; terminology and classification criteria were defined. Explanations on their origin were speculative and qualitative. In this stage there is no common literature that can serve as a basis of discussion. The fist paradigm (evolutionary model) was based on the evolutionary concept of Davis, who emphasized stages. Eckis in 1928 proposed that alluvial fans are temporal features and indicate immature stage in the geomorphological evolution. This theory was replaced by the process paradigm emphasizing equilibrium processes and morphology in the 1960s (equilibrium model). These investigations were supported by quantitative methods. Initially authors proposed a time-independent steady state equilibrium; later studies suggested dynamic equilibrium between fans and their source areas. In this model, rates of erosion of the fan and deposition into the fan are in equilibrium, complicated by climatic and tectonic conditions. That is, aggradation occurs during humid periods, while dry climatic periods are characterized by trenching. In the 1970s observations showed that normal stream processes contribute only 10–15 % of the alluvial fan volume; its majority is deposited in catastrophic events (debris flows). Thus, early evolutionary and subsequent equilibrium concepts were integrated to form a third paradigm (Lecce 1990).

Origin of Term

The term “alluvial fan” was coined by F. Drew in 1873 (Lecce 1990*).

Similar Landform/Subtype

Lava fans are produced by volcanic processes. Lava fans may be produced by (1) lava tube breakouts, resulting from lava tube blockage, increases in lava flux, or changes in slope (Carr et al. 1977; Richardson et al. 2009) (Figs. 9 and 10), or (2) along thrust zones. Lava fans were observed on Olympus Mons and the Tharsis Rise volcanoes on Mars (Richardson et al. 2009; Bleacher et al. 2011) and on Venus associated with a festoon-type volcano (Moore et al. 1992). Lava fans are subaerial fans, unlike lava-fed deltas, which form subaqueously.

See Also

References

  1. Alexander D, Coppola L (1989) Structural geology and the dissection of alluvial fan sediments by mass movement: an example from the Southern Italian apennines. Geomorphology 2:341–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armitage JJ, Warner NH, Goddard K, Gupta S (2011) Timescales of alluvial fan development by precipitation on Mars. Geophys Res Lett 38:L17203. doi:10.1029/2011GL048907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackwelder E (1928) Mudflow as a geologic agent in semi-arid mountains. Geol Soc Am Bull 28:465–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blair TC, McPherson JG (1994) Alluvial fan processes and forms. In: Abrahams AD, Parsons AJ (eds) Geomorphology of desert environments. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 354–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bleacher JE, Richardson PW, Garry WB, Zimbelman JR, Williams DA, Orr TR (2011) Identifying lava tubes and their products on Olympus Mons, Mars and implications for planetary exploration. 42nd Lunar Planet Sci Conf, abstract #1805, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  6. Blikra LH, Nemec W (1998) Postglacial colluvium in western Norway: depositional processes, facies and palaeoclimatic record. Sedimentology 45:909–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bridge JS, Demicco R (2012) Rivers, alluvial plains and fans. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 365–461Google Scholar
  8. Bull WB (1964) Geomorphology of segmented alluvial fans in western Fresno County, California. US Geol Surv Prof Pap 352E:89–129Google Scholar
  9. Bull WB (1977) The alluvial fan environment. Prog Phys Geogr 1:222–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burbank DW, Anderson RS (2011) Tectonic geomorphology, 2nd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, ChichesterCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burr DM, Perron JT, Lamb MP, Irwin RP III, Collins GC, Howard AD, Sklar LS, Moore JM, Ádámkovics M, Baker VR, Drummond SA, Black BA (2012) Fluvial features on Titan: insights from morphology and modeling. GSA Bull. doi:10.1130/B30612.1; 7Google Scholar
  12. Carr MH, Greeley R, Blasius KR, Guest JE, Murray JB (1977) Some Martian volcanic features as viewed from the viking orbiters. J Geophys Res 82(28):3985–4015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ferrier G, Pope RJJ (2012) Quantitative mapping of alluvial fan evolution using ground-based reflectance spectroscopy. Geomorphology 175–176:14–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ghail RC, Hutchinson JE (2003) An alluvial fan at Apollinaris Patera, Mars. Lunar Planet Sci Conf, abstract, # 1775, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  15. Goddard K, Goupta S, Warner NH, Kim J-R, Muller J-P (2012) Transient landscape evolution in the amazonian-age mojave crater, Mars. 43rd Lunar Planet Sci Conf, abstract #1393, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  16. Gohain K, Parkash G (1990) Morphology of the Kosi Megafan. In: Rachocki AH, Church M (eds) Alluvial fans: a field approach. Wiley, Chichester, pp 151–178Google Scholar
  17. Gole CV, Chitale SV (1966) Inland delta building activity of Kosi River. Proc Am Soc Civil Eng J Hydraul Div 92:111–126Google Scholar
  18. Grant JA, Wilson SA (2012) A possible synoptic source of water for alluvial fan formation in southern Margaritifer Terra, Mars. Planet Space Sci 72:44–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hardgrove C, Moersch J, Whisner S (2009) Thermal imaging of alluvial fans: a new technique for remote classification of sedimentary features. Earth Planet Sci Lett 285:124–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hardie LA, Smoot JP, Eugster HP (1978) Saline lakes and their deposits: a sedimentological approach. In: Matter A, Tucker ME (eds) Modern and ancient lake sediments. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford London Edinburgh Melbourne, pp 7–41, International Association of Sedimentologists Special Publication, 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harvey AM (1978) Dissected alluvial fans in southeast Spain. Catena 5:177–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harvey A (2004) Alluvial fan. In: Goudie AS (ed) Encyclopaedia of geomorphology. Routledge, London, pp 15–19Google Scholar
  23. Hooke RL (1967) Processes on arid-region alluvial fans. J Geol 75(4):438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hugenholtz CH, Wan Bun Tseung J-M (2007) Formation of interdigitate patterns on Martian alluvial fans. Lunar Planet Sci Conf XXXVIII, abstract #1011, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  25. Jaumann R, Kirk R, Lorenz R, Lopes R, Stofan E, Turtle E, Keller H, Wood C, Sotin C, Soderblom L (2009) Geology and surface processes on Titan. In: Brown R, Waite J, Lebreton J-P (eds) Titan from Cassini-Huygens. Springer, New York, pp 75–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kerber L, Head JW, Madeleine J-B, Forget F, Wilson L (2011) The dispersal of pyroclasts from Apollinaris Patera, Mars: implications for the origin of the Medusae Fossae formation. Icarus 216:212–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kiver EP, Harris DV (1999) Geology of U.S. parklands, 5th edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Kraal ER, Asphaug E (2006) Martian alluvial fans: understanding the crater connection. In: 40th ESLAB first international conference on impact cratering in the solar system, Noordwijk, Netherlands, #296248, pp 27–29Google Scholar
  29. Kraal ER, Asphaug E, Moore JM, Howard A, Bredt A (2008) Catalogue of large alluvial fans in Martian impact craters. Icarus 194:101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lang SC, Payenberg THD, Reilly MRW, Hicks T, Benson J, Kassan J (2004) Modern analogues for dryland sandy fluvial-lacustrine deltas and terminal splay reservoirs. APPEA J 32:9–356Google Scholar
  31. Lecce SA (1990) The alluvial fan problem. In: Rachocki AH, Church M (eds) Alluvial fans: a field approach. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 3–24Google Scholar
  32. Leier AL, DeCelles PG, Pelletier JD (2005) Mountains, monsoons, and megafans. Geology 33:289–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mangold N, Adeli S, Conway S, Ansan V, Langlais B (2012) A chronology of early Mars climatic evolution from impact crater degradation. J Geophys Res 117:E04003. doi:10.1029/2011JE004005Google Scholar
  34. Moore JM, Howard AD (2005) Large alluvial fans on Mars. J Geophys Res 110(E04005):24. doi:10.1029/2004JE002352Google Scholar
  35. Moore HJ, Plaut JJ, Schenk PM, Head JW (1992) An unusual volcano on Venus. J Geophys Res 97(E8):13479–13493. doi:10.1029/92JE00957#Link to external resource: 10.1029/92JE00957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Morgan AM, Beyer RA, Howard AD, Moore JM (2012) The alluvial fans of Saheki Crater. 43rd Lunar Planet Sci Conf, abstract #2815, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  37. Nichols GJ, Fisher JA (2007) Processes, facies and architecture of fluvial distributary system deposits. Sediment Geol 195:75–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. North CP, Davidson SK (2012) Unconfined alluvial flow processes: recognition and interpretation of their deposits, and the significance for palaeogeographic reconstruction. Earth Sci Rev 111:199–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Palucis MC, Dietrich WE, Hayes A, Williams RME, Calef F, Sumner DY, Gupta S, Hardgrove C et al. (2013) Origin and evolution of the Peace Vallis fan system that drains into the curiosity landing area, Gale crater. 44th Lunar Planet Sci Conf, abstract #1607, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  40. Rachocki AH, Church M (eds) (1990) Alluvial fans: a field approach. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  41. Radebaugh J, Lorenz RD, Farr TG, Kirk RL, Lunine JI, Ventra D, Le Gall A, Lopes RMC, Barnes JW, Hayes A, Stofan ER, Wall SD, Wood C (2013) Alluvial fans on Titan reveal materials, processes and regional conditions. 43rd Lunar Planet Sci Conf, abstract #2641, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  42. Richardson JE, Glaze LS, Baloga SM (2009) The relationship between lava fans and tubes on Olympus Mons in the Tharis Region, Mars. 40th Lunar Planet Sci Conf, abstract #1527, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  43. Stainstreet IG, McCarthy TS (1993) The Okavango Fan and the classification of subaerial fan systems. Sediment Geol 85:115–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thieme ML, Abel R, Stiassny MLJ, Skelton P et al (eds) (2005) Freshwater ecoregions of Africa and Madagascar: a conservation assessment. Island Press, Washington, World Widelife FoundGoogle Scholar
  45. Tooth S (1999) Floodouts in Central Australia. In: Miller AJ, Gupta A (eds) Varieties of fluvial form. Wiley, London, pp 219–247Google Scholar
  46. Williams RME, Malin MC (2008) Sub-kilometer fans in Mojave Crater, Mars. Icarus 198:365–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Williams RME, Edgett KS, and Malin MC (2004) Young fans in an equatorial crater in Xanthe Terra, Mars. Proc Lunar Planet Sci Conf 35th, abstract#1415, HoustonGoogle Scholar
  48. Williams RME, Rogers AD, Chojnacki M, Boyce J, Seedlos KD, Hardgrove C, Chuang F (2011) Evidence for episodic alluvial fan formation in far western Terra Tyrrhena, Mars. Icarus 211:222–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zanchetta G, Sulpizio R, Di Vito MA (2004) The role of volcanic activity and climate in alluvial fan growth at volcanic areas: an example from southern Campania (Italy). Sediment Geol 168:249–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Planetary Science Research GroupEötvös Loránd University, Institute of Geography and Earth SciencesBudapestHungary