Encyclopedia of Database Systems

2018 Edition
| Editors: Ling Liu, M. Tamer Özsu

Database Middleware

  • Cristiana AmzaEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8265-9_689


Database scheduling; Load balancing; Mediation and adaptation


Database middleware is a generic term used to refer to software infrastructure that supports (i) functionality, such as, interoperability between software components, or distributed transaction execution, (ii) improved database service, such as, performance scaling or fault tolerance of a database back-end in a larger system, or (iii) adaptations to workloads e.g., through the use of adaptive queuing middleware or of a scheduler component for adaptive reconfiguration of a database back-end.

Historical Background

Historically, TP Monitors were the first recognized database middleware components. TP Monitors, thus database middleware, was originally run on mainframes to connect different applications. Later, with the advent of e-business applications and modern multi-tier architectures that supported them, similar functionality as in the original TP Monitors became integrated in software components within...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Amza C, Cecchet E, Chanda A, Cox A, Elnikety S, Gil R, Marguerite J, Rajamani K, Zwaenepoel W. Specification and implementation of dynamic web site benchmarks. In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE Workshop on Workload Characterization; 2002.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amza C, Cox A, Zwaenepoel W. Conflict-aware scheduling for dynamic content applications. In: Proceedings of the 4th USENIX Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems; 2003. p. 71–84.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Amza C, Cox AL, Zwaenepoel W. Distributed versioning: consistent replication for scaling back-end databases of dynamic content web sites. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IFIP/USENIX International Middleware Conference; 2003. p. 282–304.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boral H, Alexander W, Clay L, Copeland G, Danforth S, Franklin M, Hart B, Smith M, Valduriez P. Prototyping Bubba, a highly parallel database system. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 1990;2(1):4–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chaudhuri S, Weikum G. Rethinking database system architecture: towards a self-tuning RISC-style database system. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases; 2000. p. 1–10.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Copeland G, Alexander W, Boughter E, Keller T. Data placement in Bubba. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data; 1988. p. 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Frolund S, Guerraoui R. e-transactions: end-to-end reliability for three-tier architectures. IEEE Trans Softw Eng. 2002;28(4):378–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liang W, Kemme B. Online recovery in cluster databases. In: Advances in Database Technology, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Extending Database Technology; 2008.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Milan-Franco JM, Jimenez-Peris R, Patio-Martinez M, Kemme B. Adaptive middleware for data replication. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IFIP/USENIX International Middleware Conference; 2004.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Plattner C, Alonso G. Ganymed: scalable replication for transactional web applications. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IFIP/USENIX International Middleware Conference; 2004.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rashid L, Tomasic A, Valduriez P. Scaling heterogeneous databases and the design of DISCO. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems; 1996.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rodriguez-Martinez M, Roussopoulos N. MOCHA: a self-extensible database middleware system for distributed data sources. In: Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data; 2000.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roth MT, Schwarz P. Don’t scrap it, wrap it! A wrapper architecture for legacy data sources. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Very Large Data Bases; 1997.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Soundararajan G, Amza C. Reactive provisioning of backend databases in shared dynamic content server clusters. ACM Trans Auto Adapt Syst. 2006;1(2):151–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Section editors and affiliations

  • Cristiana Amza
    • 1
  1. 1.Dept. of Elec. and Comp. Eng.Univ. of TorontoTorontoCanada