Encyclopedia of Database Systems

2018 Edition
| Editors: Ling Liu, M. Tamer Özsu

Data Quality Assessment

  • Carlo BatiniEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8265-9_107


Data quality benchmarking; Data quality measurement


The goal of the assessment activity in the area of data quality methodologies is to provide a precise evaluation and diagnosis of the state of databases and data flows of an information system with regard to data quality issues. In the assessment the evaluation is performed measuring the quality of data collections along relevant quality dimensions. The term (data quality) measurement is used to address the issue of measuring the value of a set of data quality dimensions. The term (data quality) assessment is used when such measurements are analyzed in order to enable a diagnosis of the quality of the data collection. The term (data quality) benchmarking is used when the output of the assessment is compared against reference indices, representing average values or best practices values in similar organizations. The term (data quality) readinessaims at assessing the overall predisposition of the organization in...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Recommended Reading

  1. 1.
    Atzeni P, Merialdo P, Sindoni G. Web site evaluation: methodology and case study. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Data Semantics in Web Information Systems; 2001.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Batini C, Scannapieco M. Data quality: concepts, methodologies and techniques. Springer; 2006.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    De Amicis F, Batini C. A methodology for data quality assessment on financial data. Stud Commun Sci. 2004;4(2):115–36.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    English LP. Improving data warehouse and business information quality. Wiley; 1999.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    English LP. Process management and information quality: how improving information production processes improves information (product) quality. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information Quality; 2002. p. 206–9.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fraternali P, Lanzi PL, Matera M, Maurino A. Model-driven web usage analysis for the evaluation of web application quality. J Web Eng. 2004;3(2):124–52.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kahn B, Strong DM, Wang RY. Information quality benchmarks: product and service performance. Commun ACM. 2002;45(4):184–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee YW, Strong DM, Kahn BK, Wang RY. AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment. Inf Manag. 2001;40(2):133–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pipino L, Lee YW, Wang RY. Data quality assessment. Commun ACM. 2002;45(4):211–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Redman TC. The impact of poor data quality on the typical enterprise. Commun ACM. 1998;41(2):70–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sheng YH. Exploring the mediating and moderating effects of information quality on firms? Endeavor on information systems. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information Quality; 2003. p. 344–53.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Milano-BicoccaMilanItaly

Section editors and affiliations

  • Felix Naumann
    • 1
  1. 1.Information SystemsHasso-Plattner-InstitutePotsdamGermany