Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

Living Edition
| Editors: Alain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello

No-Fault Revolution and Divorce Rate

  • Bruno JeandidierEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_678-1

Abstract

Concomitantly with the no-fault divorce revolution in the United States, there has been an increase in the divorce rate. From this observation, the question emerged of whether divorce law had a neutral effect on divorce behavior. Economists have conceptualized the issue by using an approach based on the “Coaseian” negotiation process, comparing unilateral divorce to divorce by mutual consent. The theoretical model predicts the neutrality of the law. But in the case of divorce, these assumptions are questionable. A determination as to the neutrality or non-neutrality of divorce law can thus be made based on empirical analysis. Early empirical studies came to conclusions favoring neutrality, but little by little, as methodological controversies accumulated, those empirical conclusions became more refined. Finally, a certain consensus emerged that the revolution in divorce would seem to have had a positive short-term impact on the divorce rate on the one hand, due more to the transition to unilateralism than to the abandonment of any reference to fault, and to have had a negative effect on the longer-term divorce rate on the other, because divorce law reform would seem to have prompted better-quality marriages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Allen DW (1992) Marriage and divorce: comment. Am Econ Rev 82(3):679–685Google Scholar
  2. Bracke S, Mulier K (2017) Making divorce easier: the role of no-fault and unilateral revisited. Eur J Law Econ 43(2):239–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brinig M, Buckley FH (1998) No-fault laws and at-fault people. Int Rev Law Econ 18(3):325–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Drewianka S (2008) Divorce law and family formation. J Popul Econ 21:485–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ellman IM, Lohr SL (1998) Dissolving the relationship between divorce laws and divorce rates. Int Rev Law Econ 18(3):341–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Friedberg L (1998) Did unilateral divorce raise divorce rates? Evidence from panel data. Am Econ Rev 88(4):608–627Google Scholar
  7. Glenn ND (1997) A reconsideration of the effect of no-fault divorce on divorce rates. J Marriage Fam 59(4):1023–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glenn ND (1999) Further discussion of the effects of no-fault divorce on divorce rates. J Marriage Fam 61(3):800–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gonzalez L, Viitanen TK (2009) The effect of divorce laws on divorce rates in Europe. Eur Econ Rev 53(2):127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gruber J (2004) Is making divorce easier bad for children? The long-run implications of unilateral divorce. J Labor Econ 22(4):799–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kneip T, Bauer G (2009) Did unilateral divorce laws raise divorce rates in Western Europe? J Marriage Fam 71:592–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Leeson PT, Pierson J (2017) Economic origins of no-fault divorce revolution. Eur J Law Econ 43(3):419–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mechoulan S (2006) Divorce laws and the structure of the American family. J Leg Stud 35:143–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nakonezny PA, Schull RD, Rodgers JL (1995) The effect of no-fault divorce law on the divorce rate across the 50 states and its relation to income, education, and religiosity. J Marriage Fam 57(2):477–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Peters EH (1986) Marriage and divorce: informational constraints and private contracting. Am Econ Rev 76(3):437–448Google Scholar
  16. Peters EH (1992) Marriage and divorce, reply. Am Econ Rev 82(3):687–693Google Scholar
  17. Peterson R (1996) A re-evaluation of the economic consequences of divorce. Am Sociol Rev 61(3):528–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Rasul I (2005) Marriage markets and divorce laws. J Law Econ Org 22(1):30–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rodgers JL, Nakonezny PA, Schull RD (1997) The effect of no-fault divorce legislation: a response to a reconsideration. J Marriage Fam 59(4):1026–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rodgers JL, Nakonezny PA, Schull RD (1999) Did no-fault divorce legislation matter? Definitely yes and sometimes no. J Marriage Fam 61(3):803–809CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Weitzman LJ (1985) The divorce revolution: the unexpected social and economic consequences for women and children in America. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Wolfers J (2006) Did unilateral divorce raise divorce rates? A reconciliation and new results. Am Econ Rev 96(5):1802–1820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zelder M (1993a) The economic analysis of the effect of no-fault divorce law on the divorce rate. Harv J Law Public Policy 16(1):240–268Google Scholar
  24. Zelder M (1993b) Inefficient dissolution as a consequence of public goods: the case of non-fault divorce. J Leg Stud 22:503–520CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bureau d’Economie Théorique et Appliquée (BETA)CNRS and University of LorraineNancyFrance