Skip to main content

Credit (Rating Agencies)

Book cover Encyclopedia of Law and Economics
  • 124 Accesses

Abstract

Credit rating agencies (CRAs) are pivotal players in financial markets, and in fact their conduct has attracted the attention of scholars, media, and policy analysts. A very common claim is that CRA behavior contributed to the explosion and the propagation of the recent financial crisis. This entry sketches the functioning of the market for ratings and explores the market failures by which it is characterized. Moreover, this entry briefly presents some of the proposals advanced by the law and economics literature to induce CRAs to issue accurate ratings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Becker B, Milbourn T (2011) How did increased competition affect credit ratings? J Financ Econ 101:493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton P, Freixas X, Shapiro J (2012) The credit ratings game. J Finance 67:85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calomiris CW (2009) A recipe for ratings reform. Econ Voice 6:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi S (1998) Market lessons for gatekeepers. Northwest Univ Law Rev 92:916–919

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffee JC Jr (2004) Gatekeeper failure and reform: the challenge of fashioning relevant reforms. Boston Univ Law Rev 84:301

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffee JC Jr (2006) Gatekeepers: the professions and corporate governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Coffee JC Jr (2011) Ratings reforms: the good, the bad and the ugly. Harv Bus Law Rev 1:231

    Google Scholar 

  • Coval J et al (2009) The economics of structured finance. J Econ Perspect 23:3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darcy D (2009) Credit rating agencies and the credit crisis: how the issuer pays conflict contributed and what regulators might do about it. C Bus Law Rev 2:605

    Google Scholar 

  • Deats C (2010) Note, talk that isn’t cheap: does the first amendment protect credit rating agencies’ faulty methodologies from regulation? Columbia Law Rev 110:1818

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis K (2009) The rating game: explaining rating agency failures in the buildup to the financial crisis. Univ Miami Law Rev 63:1111

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrov V et al (2015) Impact of the Dodd-Frank act on credit ratings. J Fin Econ 115:505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flannery MJ et al (2010) Credit default swap spreads as viable substitutes for credit ratings. Univ Pennsylvania Law Rev 158:2085

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost CA (2007) Credit rating agencies in capital markets: a review of research evidence on selected criticisms of the agencies. J Account Audit Finance 22:469

    Google Scholar 

  • Goel AM, Thakor AV (2011) Credit ratings and litigation risk. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract51787206

  • Gorton G, Ordoñez G (2014) Collateral crises. Am Econ Rev 104:343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill CA (2010) Justification norms under uncertainty: a preliminary inquiry. Conn Insur Law J 17:27

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill CA (2003) Rating agencies behaving badly: the case of Enron. Conn Law Rev 35:1145

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (2010) Berating the raters, N.Y Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/26/opinion/26krugman.html?_r=0

  • Listokin Y, Taibleson B (2010) If you Misrate, then you lose: improving credit rating accuracy through incentive compensation. Yale J Regul 27:91

    Google Scholar 

  • Macey (1998) Wall street versus main street: how ignorance, hyperbole, and fear lead to regulation. Univ Chicago Law Rev 65:1487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathis J, McAndrews J, Rochet J-C (2009) Rating the raters: are reputation concerns powerful enough to discipline rating agencies? J Monet Econ 56:657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opp C et al (2013) Rating agencies in the face of regulation. J Financ Econ 108:46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pacces A, Romano A (2015) A strict liability regime for rating agencies. Am Bus Law J 52:673

    Google Scholar 

  • Partnoy F (1999) The Siskel and Ebert of financial markets?: two thumbs down for the credit rating agencies. Wash Univ Law Q 77:619

    Google Scholar 

  • Partnoy F (2006) How and why credit rating agencies are not like other gatekeepers. In: Fuchita Y, Litan RE (eds) Financial gatekeepers: can they protect investors? Nomura Institute of Capital Markets Research/Brooking Institution Press, Tokyo/Washington, DC, p 61

    Google Scholar 

  • Priest GL (1987) The current insurance crisis and modern tort law. Yale Law J 96:1521

    Google Scholar 

  • Skreta V, Veldkamp L (2009) Ratings shopping and asset complexity: a theory of ratings inflation. J Monet Econ 56:678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White LJ (2010) Markets: the credit rating agencies. J Econ Perspect 24:211

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Romano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Romano, A. (2017). Credit (Rating Agencies). In: Marciano, A., Ramello, G. (eds) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_667-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_667-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7883-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7883-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Credit: Rating Agencies
    Published:
    26 November 2021

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_667-2

  2. Original

    Credit (Rating Agencies)
    Published:
    22 February 2017

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_667-1