Skip to main content

Environmental Policy (Choice)

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Law and Economics
  • 105 Accesses

Abstract

The choice between environmental policies is traditionally considered in terms of ex ante versus ex post interventions on the behavior of (potential) injurers that (can) cause an environmental accident with a consequent environmental damage. Moreover, market-based policies can be implemented as an indirect form of incentive for correct behavior. The two market-based policies, taxes and tradable permits system, are compared on the basis of the difference between price and quantity instruments. And finally, the real situation of the presence of an environmental policy mix is considered as a research challenging topic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Calabresi G (1970) The cost of accident. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooter RD, Ulen TS (1988) Law and economics. Collins, Harper

    Google Scholar 

  • Cropper ML, Oates WE (1992) Environmental economics: a survey. J Econ Lit 30:675–740

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein RA (1973) A theory of strict liability. J Leg Stud 2:151–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faure M, Skogh G (2003) The economic analysis of environmental policy and law – an introduction. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone N (2003) The use of tradable permits in combination with other environmental policy instruments. Report ENV/EPOC/WPNEP(2002)28/Final, OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplow L, Shavell S (2002) On the superiority of corrective taxes to quantity. Am Law Econ Rev 4:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolstad CD, Ulen TS, Johnson GV (1990) Ex post liability for harm vs. ex ante safety regulation: substitutes or complements. Am Econ Rev 80:888–901

    Google Scholar 

  • Porrini D (2005) Environmental policies choice as an issue of informational efficiency. In: Backhaus JG (ed) The Elgar companion to law and economics, 2nd edn. Edwar Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 350–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman S (1991) Regulation and the law of torts. Am Econ RevPap Proc 81: 54–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavell S (1984) Liability for harms versus regulation of safety. J Leg Stud 13:357–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavell S (1986) The judgement proof problem. Int Rev Law Econ 6(June):45–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavins R (1998) Market-based environmental policies. Resources for the Future, Discussion Paper 98–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman ML (1974) Prices vs. quantities. Rev Econ Stud 41(4):477–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donatella Porrini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media LLC

About this entry

Cite this entry

Porrini, D. (2017). Environmental Policy (Choice). In: Marciano, A., Ramello, G. (eds) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_614-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_614-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7883-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7883-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics