Encyclopedia of Law and Economics

Living Edition
| Editors: Alain Marciano, Giovanni Battista Ramello

Hayek, Friedrich August von

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7883-6_225-1

Abstract

F.A. Hayek focused on many traditional economic questions, and also made important contributions to law and economics. His framework differed from Kaldor Hicks efficiency and the wealth maximization norm common among neoclassical law and economics scholars. But he talked about how the common law evolves and helps shape economic outcomes. Underlying this approach was Hayek’s conviction that the essence of law is not created by the state, but rather preexists in the conventions and understandings within a community. Hayek argued that the role of the judge in a common-law system is to discover the law in the imminent consensus of norms and expectations. Hayek’s work has many implications for positive analysis and normative discussions of what judges should or should not do. To Hayek, the primary purpose of the law is not a wealth maximization problem, but to provide a stable institutional framework in a dynamic world that enables individuals to plan and coordinate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. Bernstein L (1992) Opting out of the legal system: extralegal contractual relations in the diamond industry. J Leg Stud 21:115–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benson BL (1990) The Enterprise of law: justice without the state. Pacific Research Institute for Public Policy, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  3. Caldwell B (2004) Hayek’s challenge: an intellectual biography of F. A. Hayek. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  4. Ellickson RC (1991) Order without law: how neighbors settle disputes. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  5. Hayek FA (1944) The Road to Serfdom. The University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  6. Hayek FA (1945) The use of knowledge in society. Am Econ Rev 35(4):519–530Google Scholar
  7. Hayek FA (1960) The constitution of liberty. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  8. Hayek FA (1968/2002) Competition as a discovery procedure. (Marcellus S. Snow Trans.) Q J Austrian Econ 5:9–23Google Scholar
  9. Hayek FA (1973) Law, legislation and liberty, volume 1: Rules and order. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  10. Hayek FA (1976a/1990) The denationalisation of money, 3rd edn. Institute of Economic Affairs, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Hayek FA (1976b) Law, legislation and liberty, volume 2: The mirage of social justice. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  12. Hayek FA (1978) Tom Hazlett interviews Friedrich A. Hayek, November 12, 1978. UCLA Oral History Program and the Pacific Academy of Advanced Studies. www.hayek.ufm.edu. Accessed 12 Dec 2010
  13. Hayek FA (1979) Law, legislation and liberty, volume 3: the political order of a free people. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hume D (1740) A treatise of human nature. Book III. John Noon, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Stringham EP (2015) Private governance: creating order in economic and social life. Oxford University, New York/OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stringham EP, Zywicki TJ (2011a) Hayekian Anarchism. J Econ Behav Organ 78(3):290–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stringham EP, Zywicki TJ (2011b) Rivalry and superior dispatch: an analysis of competing courts in medieval and early modern England. Public Choice 147:497–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Zywicki TJ (1998) Epstein and Polanyi on simple rules, complex systems, and decentralization. Constit Polit Econ 9:143–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zywicki TJ (2000) Was Hayek right about group selection after all? Review essay of unto others: the evolution and psychology of unselfish behavior by Elliott sober and David Sloan Wilson. Rev Austrian Econ 13(1):81–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zywicki TJ, Sanders AB (2008) Posner, Hayek, and the economic analysis of law. Iowa Law Rev 93:559–604Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media LLC 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Economic Organizations and InnovationTrinity CollegeHartfordUSA
  2. 2.American Institute for Economic ResearchGreat BarringtonUSA
  3. 3.Antonin Scalia Law SchoolGeorge Mason UniversityArlingtonUSA