Skip to main content

Constructivism, Cultural Evolution, and Spontaneous Order

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Law and Economics
  • 88 Accesses

Definition

This essay describes two completely different approaches which have been distinguished by Friedrich A. Hayek, the “constructivist” one and the “evolutionary” one, to the problem of how to develop institutions appropriate for the achievement of a desirable society. It does it by detailing Hayek’s analysis of the two approaches. First, the essay describes the “constructivist” contention that only institutions deliberately adopted by certain competent persons are likely to achieve a desirable society. Then, it presents the “evolutionary” viewpoint defended by Hayek, according to which a lot of beneficial institutions can be discovered only through spontaneous, undesigned growth.

Constructivism

Hayek uses the term “constructivist rationalists” to designate a large and diverse group of scholars which includes Bacon, Descartes, Hobbes, Leibniz, Spinoza, Voltaire, Rousseau, Bentham, Austin, Hegel, Marx, Comte, Saint-Simon, and the American Institutionalists. These scholars, Hayek...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 819.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arnold R (1980) Hayek and institutional evolution. J Libertarian Stud 4(4):341–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebenstein A (2001) Liberty and law. In: Ebenstein A Friedrich Hayek A biography. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 223–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Gissurarson H (1987) Three liberal criticisms of traditionalism. In: Gissurarson H Hayek’s conservative liberalism. Garland, New York, pp 126–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek F (1958) Freedom, reason, and tradition. Ethics 68(4):229–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek F (1960) The constitution of liberty. University of Chicago press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek F (1968) Speech on the 70th birthday of Leonard Reed. In: What’s past is prologue: a commemorative evening to the foundation for economic education on the occasion of Leonard Read’s seventieth birthday. Foundation for Economic Education, New York, pp 37–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek F (1979) Law, legislation and liberty, vol. 3: the political order of a free people. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek F (1986) Cultural evolution: the presumption of reason. World & I 1(2):683–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek F (1987) Individual and collective aims. In: Mendus S, Edwards D (eds) On toleration. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 35–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Macedo S (1999) Hayek’s liberal legacy. Cato J 19(2):289–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Menger C (1883) Untersuchungen über die Methode der Sozialwissenschaften, und der politischen Oekonomie insbesondere. Verlag von Duncker & Humblot, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell W (1925) Quantitative analysis in economic theory. Am Econ Rev 15(1):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Petroni A (1995) What is right with Hayek’s ethical theory. Rev Eur Sci Sociales 33(100):89–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Salle C (2003) Fin de l’Histoire et légitimité du droit dans l’oeuvre de F. A von Hayek. Rev Fr Sci Polit 53(1):127–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Servant R (2014) Libéralisme, socialisme et État providence : la théorie hayékienne de l’évolution culturelle est-elle cohérente ? Rev économique 65:373–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Servant R (2018) Spontaneous growth, use of reason, and constitutional design: Is F. A. Hayek’s social thought consistent? J Hist Econ Thought, forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele G (1994) On the internal consistency of Hayek’s evolutionary oriented constitutional economics: a comment. J Économistes Études Hum 5(1):157–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele G (2002) Hayek’s liberalism and its origins: his idea of spontaneous order and the Scottish enlightenment. Christinia Petsoulas. Q J Austrian Econ 5(1):93–95

    Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Boudreaux D (2014) Legislation is distinct from law. In: Boudreaux D The essential Hayek. Fraser Institute, Canada, pp 32–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan J (1977) Law and the invisible hand. In: Buchanan J Freedom in constitutional contract: perspectives of a political economist. Texas A&M University Press, College Station, pp 25–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond A (1980) F. A. Hayek on constructivism and ethics. J Libertarian Stud 4(4):353–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek F (1946) Individualism: true and false. Hodges, Figgis & Co. Ltd., Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek F (1965) Kinds of rationalism. Econ Stud Q 15(2):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek F (1966) Lecture on a master mind: Dr. Bernard Mandeville. Proc Br Acad 52:125–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek F (1967) Notes on the evolution of systems of rules of conduct. In: Hayek F Studies in philosophy, politics and economics. University of Chicago press, Chicago, pp 66–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek F (1973) Law, legislation and liberty, vol. 1: rules and order. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek F (1988) The fatal conceit: the errors of socialism. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner I (1990) Knowledge problems and their solutions: some relevant distinctions. Cult Dyn 3(1):32–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moroni S (2014) Two different theories of two distinct spontaneous phenomena: orders of actions and evolution of institutions in Hayek. Cosmos + Taxis 1(2):9–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadeau R (2016) Cultural evolution, group selection and methodological individualism: a plea for Hayek. Cosmos + Taxis 3(2):9–22

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Driscoll G (2015) Hayek and the scots on liberty. J Priv Enterp 30(2):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith V (2008) Rationality in economics: constructivist and ecological forms. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith C (2014) Hayek and spontaneous order. In: Garrison R, Barry N (eds) Elgar companion to Hayekian economics. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, Cheltenham, pp 224–245

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Régis Servant .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Servant, R. (2019). Constructivism, Cultural Evolution, and Spontaneous Order. In: Marciano, A., Ramello, G.B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_756

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics