Skip to main content

Coase Theorem: Empirical Tests

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Law and Economics
  • 150 Accesses

Abstract

This entry examines three classic tests of the Coase theorem: two empirical studies on the most famous examples of externalities – Coase’s ranchers and farmers (Ellickson, Stanford Law Rev. 38(3):623–687, 1986) and Meade’s bees (Cheung, J Law Econ 16(1):11–33, 1973) – as well as the seminal laboratory experiments of Hoffman and Spitzer (J Law Econ 25(1):73–98, 1982). I will insist on the difficulty of testing the theorem without measuring transaction costs, and on another obstacle to negotiation over and above these costs: a moral or social prohibition on exchange.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 819.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aivazian VA, Callen JL, McCracken S (2009) Experimental tests of core theory and the Coase theorem: inefficiency and cycling. J Law Econ 52(4):745–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand E (2011) What do cattle and bees tell us about the Coase theorem? Eur J Law Econ 31(1):39–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand E (2014) Autorisation à l’échange sur des externalités. De l’interdiction à l’obligation. Revue Economique 65(2):439–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cherry TL, Shogren JF (2005) Costly Coasean bargaining and property right security. Environ Resour Econ 31(3):349–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung SNS (1969) The theory of share tenancy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung SNS (1973) The fable of the bees: an economic investigation. J Law Econ 16(1):11–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase RH (1960) The problem of social cost. J Law Econ 3:1–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coursey DL, Hoffman E, Spitzer ML (1987) Fear and loathing in the Coase theorem: experimental tests involving physical discomfort. J Leg Stud 16(1):217–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cymrot DJ, Dunlevy JA, Even WE (2001) “Who’s on first”: an empirical test of the Coase theorem in baseball. Appl Econ 33(5):593–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donohue JJ III (1989) Diverting the Coasean river: incentive schemes to reduce unemployment spells. Yale Law J 99(3):549–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellickson RC (1986) Of Coase and cattle: dispute resolution among neighbors in Shasta county. Stanford Law Rev 38(3):623–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farnsworth W (1999) Do parties to nuisance cases bargain after judgment? A glimpse inside the cathedral. Univ Chicago Law Rev 66(2):373–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galanter M (1983) Reading the landscape of disputes: what we know and don’t know (and think we don’t know) about our allegedly contentious and litigious society. UCLA Law Rev 31:4–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley N, Sumner C (1995) Bargaining over common property resources: applying the Coase theorem to red deer in the Scottish Highlands. J Environ Manag 43(1):87–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison GW, McKee M (1985) Experimental evaluation of the Coase theorem. J Law Econ 28(3):653–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison GW, Hoffman E, Rutström EE, Spitzer ML (1987) Coasian solutions to the externality problem in experimental markets. Econ J 97(386):388–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman E, Spitzer ML (1982) The Coase theorem: some experimental tests. J Law Econ 25(1):73–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman E, Spitzer ML (1985a) Entitlements, rights, and fairness: an experimental examination of subjects’ concepts of distributive justice. J Leg Stud 14(2):259–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman E, Spitzer ML (1985b) Experimental law and economics: an introduction. Columbia Law Rev 85(5):991–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman E, Spitzer ML (1986) Experimental tests of the Coase theorem with large bargaining groups. J Leg Stud 15(1):149–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hylan TR, Lage MJ, Treglia M (1996) The Coase theorem, free agency, and major league baseball: a panel study of pitcher mobility from 1961 to 1992. South Econ J 62(4):1029–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson DB (1973) Meade, bees, and externalities. J Law Econ 16(1):35–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D, Knetsch JL, Thaler RH (1990) Experimental tests of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem. J Polit Econ 98(6):1325–1348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelman M (1985) Comment on Hoffman and Spitzer’s “Experimental law and economics”. Columbia Law Rev 85(5):1037–1047

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey RD, Page T (2000) An experimental study of the effect of private information in the Coase theorem. Exp Econ 3:187–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meade JE (1952) External economies and diseconomies in a competitive situation. Econ J 62:54–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medema SG (1997) The trial of homo economicus: what law and economics tells us about the development of economic imperialism? In: Davis JB (ed) New economics and its history, suppl. 29. Duke university Press, Durham, pp 122–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Medema SG, Zerbe RO Jr (2000) The Coase theorem. In: Bouckaert B, De Geest G (eds) Encyclopedia of law and economics, vol 1. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 836–892

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram S (1974) Obedience to authority. Harper & Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters HE (1986) Marriage and divorce: informational constraints and private contracting. Am Econ Rev 76(3):437–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Plott CR (1983) Externalities and corrective policies in experimental markets. Econ J 93(369):106–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prudencio YC (1982) The voluntary approach to externality problems: an experimental test. J Environ Econ Manag 9(3):213–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads TA, Shogren JF (1999) On Coasean bargaining with transaction costs. Appl Econ Lett 6(12):779–783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab S (1988) A Coasean experiment on contract presumptions. J Leg Stud 17(2):237–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shogren JF (1992) An experiment on Coasian bargaining over ex ante lotteries and ex post rewards. J Econ Behav Organ 17(1):153–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shogren JF, Moffett R, Margolis M (2002) Coasean bargaining with nonconvexities. Appl Econ Lett 9(15):971–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler GJ (1966) The theory of price, 3rd edn. Macmillan, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski S (2007) The champions league and the Coase theorem. Scott J Polit Econ 54(3):355–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel KR (1987) The Coase theorem and California animal trespass law. J Leg Stud 16(1):149–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elodie Bertrand .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Bertrand, E. (2019). Coase Theorem: Empirical Tests. In: Marciano, A., Ramello, G.B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_628

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics