Abstract
The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement) was negotiated between 1986 and 1994 during the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), which led to the establishment of the World Trade Organization (WTO). The TRIPS Agreement sets minimum levels of several types of intellectual property (IP) protection, including copyright, trademarks, patents, industrial design, and trade secrets protection. Membership in the WTO includes an obligation to comply with the TRIPS Agreement. According to the WTO, the Agreement attempts to strike a balance between long-term social benefits to society of increased innovations and short-term costs to society from the lack of access to inventions (World Trade Organization (n.d.) Intellectual property: protection and enforcement. Retrieved from understanding the WTO: the agreements: http://wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/agrm7_e.htm).
This entry considers this balance by looking at the two poles of intellectual property policy: providing incentives to increase innovation and optimizing access to inventions both for consumptive use and for potentially innovation-increasing experimentation. This entry also surveys the notion of calibration, the idea that every country or region should adapt its regulatory framework to reflect its own strengths and weaknesses in optimizing what one might refer to as its innovation policy. A calibration approach suggests that providing innovation incentives and optimizing access are not mutually exclusive objectives.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Burk D, Lemley M (2010) The patent crisis and how the courts can solve it. Syracuse Sci Tech Law Rep 23:1–22
Chandler A, Sunder M (2007) Is Nozick kicking Rawls ass?: intellectual property and social justice. UC Davis Law Rev 40:563
Cheng T (2012) A developmental approach to the patent-antitrust interface. Northwest J Int Law Bus 33:1–79
Falvey R, Foster N, Greenaway D (2004) Intellectual property rights and economic growth. Internationalisation of economic policy research paper no 2004/12, 2. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=715982
Gallini N (1992) Patent policy and costly imitation. Rand J Econ 23(1):52–63
Gervais D (2005) Intellectual property and development: the state of play. Fordham Law Rev 74(74):505–535
Gibbons L (2011) Do as I say (not as I did): putative intellectual property lessons for emerging economies from the not so long past of the developed nations. SMU Law Rev 64(3):923–973
Hollis A (2004) An efficient reward system for pharmaceutical innovation. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/intellectualproperty/news/Submission-Hollis6-Oct.pdf
Josselin J-M, Marciano A (2001) L’analyse economique du droit et le renouvellement de l’econonmie politique des choix publics. Economie Publique/Pub Econ 7:6
Mackaay E (1994) Legal hybrids: beyond property and monopoly? Columbia Law Rev 94:2630
Mansfield E (1986) Patents and innovation: an empirical study. Manag Sci 32(2):173–181
Maskus K (2000) Lessons from studying the international economics of intellectual property rights. Vanderbilt Law Rev 53(6):2219–2239
Mullin J (2013) In historic vote, New Zealand bans software patents: patent claims can’t cover computer programs ‘as such’. Retrieved from Ars Technica: http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/08/in-historic-vote-new-zealand-bans-software-patents
Okedjii R (2009) History lessons for the WIPO development agenda. In: Netanel W (ed) Intellectual property and developing countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 137–162
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2011) Competing in the global economy, technology: quality in OECD science, technology and industry scoreboard. Retrieved from oecd.org
Perroux F (1988) The pole of development’s new place in a general theory of economic activity. In: Higgins B, Savoie D (eds) Regional economic development: essays in honour of Francois Perroux. Unwin Hyman, Boston, pp 48–76
Reichman J (1992) Legal hybrids between the patent and copyright paradigms. In: Altes WK (ed) Information law towards the 21st century. Kluwer Law, Deventer, pp 325–341
Reichman J (2000) The trips agreement comes of age: conflicts or cooperation with the developing countries. Case West Reserve J Int Law 32:441
Shrestha S (2010) Trolls or market-maker? An empirical analysis of nonpracticing entities. Columbia Law Rev 110:114–160
Sprigman C (2004) Reform(aliz)ing copyright. Stanf Law Rev 57:552
Stanley C (2003) A dangerous step toward the over protection of intellectual property: rethinking Edler v. Ashcroft. Hamline Law Rev 679:694–695
Waldron J (1988) The right to private property. Clarendon, Oxford
World Trade Organization (2014) Members accepting amendment of the TRIPS Agreement. Retrieved from intellectual property: trips and public health: http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/amendment_e.htm
World Trade Organization (n.d.) Intellectual property: protection and enforcement. Retrieved from understanding the WTO: the agreements: http://wto.org/english/thewto_e/whatis_e/tif_e/agrm7_e.htm
Further Reading
La Forgia F, Osenigo L, Montobbio F (2009) IPRs and technological development in pharmaceuticals: who is patenting what in Brazil after TRIPS. In: Netanel W (ed) The development agenda: global intellectual property and developing countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 293–319
Nachbar T (2004) Intellectual property and constitutional norms. Columbia Law Rev 104:338–339
Prud’homme D (2012) Dulling the cutting-edge: how patent-related policies and practices hamper innovation in China. Beijing, European Union Chamber of Commerce in China
Ragavan S (2012) Patent and trade disparities in developing countries. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Gervais, D. (2019). TRIPS Agreement. In: Marciano, A., Ramello, G.B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_563
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7753-2_563
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7752-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7753-2
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences